Ch04 - Audit Evidence and Audit Programs
Ch04 - Audit Evidence and Audit Programs
MULTIPLE CHOICE:
1.
2.
3.
4.
36
ANSWER:
5.
7.
6.
37
38
8.
9.
10.
11.
15.
14.
13.
39
40
16.
17.
18.
20.
19.
ANSWER:
21.
24.
23.
22.
41
42
25.
26.
This is an
28.
27.
43
ANSWER:
29.
30.
32.
31.
of inferential
of the client's
test counts.
securities for
44
d.
ANSWER:
33.
34.
36.
35.
d.
ANSWER:
37.
41.
40.
39.
38.
45
46
42.
43.
45.
44.
ANSWER:
46.
49.
48.
47.
47
48
50.
51.
52.
54.
53.
ANSWER:
55.
49
COMPLETION:
56.
57.
PLANNING
58.
59.
60.
COMMISSION, OMISSION
61.
COMPETENCE (VALIDITY)
PHYSICAL
50
62.
Analytical
supporting
suspicions
aroused by
ANSWER:
63.
of evidence
that auditors'
are often first
procedures.
COMPLETENESS
MATHEMATICAL
65.
64.
DOCUMENTED
TRANSACTION CYCLE
MATCHING:
66. For each of the listed auditing procedures, indicate, by
letter, the type of evidence it represents.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Physical evidence
Confirmation evidence
Documentary evidence
Analytical evidence
Mathematical evidence
Hearsay evidence
vendors
51
e
c
a
d
d
b
f
e
b
a
d
Existence or occurrence
Completeness
Rights and obligations
Valuation or allocation
Presentation and disclosure
52
____ 5.
____ 6.
____ 7.
____ 8.
____ 9.
a,d
d
e
b
b,c
a,c,d
d
e
a
b
PROBLEM/ESSAY
68. For each of the following ledger accounts, give an example
of substance underlying the account balance:
53
Cash in bank
Sales revenue
Inventories
Accounts payable
Notes payable
Capital stock
Marketable securities
Operating expenses
Wages and salaries expense
Property, plant, and equipment
SOLUTION:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
SOLUTION:
a.
Sufficient audit evidence is evidence that is adequate
to support the auditors opinion on the financial statements. A
matter of audit judgment, sufficiency is usually based on
materiality and the adequacy of existing internal control.
b.
Validity of audit evidence is a function of three
qualities:
1) The independence and competence of the source of
the evidence (e.g., external evidence possesses
greater validity than internal evidence);
2) The conditions under which the evidence was
54
%
100%
2003
22,000
11,000
1 100
9,900
3,600
6,300
2,000
4,300
=====
%
100%
Change (%)
22%
Required:
a. Complete the vertical and horizontal analysis by
calculating the correct percentages.
b.
Why are both vertical and horizontal analysis important
inputs to analytical procedures?
c.
Assuming sales commissions have been accurately
computed based on 2003 sales, what are the possible explanations
for any abnormalities produced by your percentage calculations?
SOLUTION:
a.
55
%
100%
56
6
38
17
21
7
14
==
2003
22,000
11,000
1,100
9,900
3,600
6,300
2,000
4,300
=====
100%
50
5
45
16
29
9
20
==
Change (%)
22%
10
2
43
13
69
67
71
2002
14,980
7,400
4,300
1,300
10,100
4,980
56
Required:
Based on the above data, in which areas do you recommend
concentrating audit resources for the 2003 audit? Support your
answer by citing the relevant data.
SOLUTION:
2003
Sales
Cost of sales
Gross margin
$15,660
7,800
7,860
2002
50%
14,980
7,400
5,580
49%
57
71.
TRAMWAY ENTERPRISES
Bank Reconciliation
12/31/2003
Balance per bank
Add deposit in transit
$5,774 *
1,223 &
6,997
$67 &
4477
4478
4479
180 &
1,023 &
33 &
Adjusted balance
Balance per ledger
Adjustment to correct
Adjusted balance as above
1,303
$5,594
=====
$6,300
(706)
$5,594
======
SOLUTION:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.