James Bond in a Honda?

TRIAL SCRIPT
Roles
Judge
Bailiff
Court Clerk
Court Reporter
MGM Lawyer
Honda Lawyer
Morgan Matsuda (Ad Agency VP)
Devon Dominic (Ad Agency Employee)
Sandy Smith (Casting Director)
Jamie Jones (Honda Executive)
MGM Executive (Hayden Hunt)
Avery Adams (Expert #1)
Professor Casey (Expert #2)
Taylor Trent (Expert #3)
JUDGE: The court will now hear the case of
Metro Goldwyn Mayer versus American Honda
Motor Company. Counsel, are you ready to
proceed?
MGM LAWYER: We are, Your Honor.
HONDA LAWYER: Yes, Your Honor.
JUDGE: Very well. You may proceed with your
opening statements.
MGM LAWYER [gets up from table and stands in
front of jury]: Good morning, ladies and
gentlemen. Were here today for one very
simple reason: Its against the law to copy
someone elses idea. Today, you are going to
see a television advertisement that Honda
created for its Del Sol convertible. Now, if
youve ever watched a James Bond movie, this
ad is going to seem very familiar to you. Lots of
us are familiar with James Bond. We can even
picture him in our minddark hair, good
looking, wears a tuxedo. We can probably even
imagine him in action, using all kinds of hightech gadgets to fight some grotesque villain.
Why can we imagine this? Because James Bond
is one-of-a-kind. Today, you will learn how
Honda took that one-of-a-kind idea and used it
to make a television ad for Hondas own profit.

HONDA LAWYER [gets up from table and stands

in front of jury]: Ladies and gentlemen, weve
all seen action movies. In fact, once youve
seen a couple dozen of these films, they all
start to seem pretty similar, dont they? A
good-looking hero, a horrible villain, lots of
shooting and high-tech stuff We see these in
just about every action film out there. Today,
you will hear a big movie company complain
that a simple television ad somehow copies a
major motion picture. You will hear the movie
companys experts try to convince you that
these elements we see in every action film are
actually found only in James Bond movies. Do
not be fooled, ladies and gentlemen. Thank
you.
JUDGE [to MGM Lawyer]: Are you ready to
proceed?
MGM LAWYER: I am, Your Honor. I would like to
begin by introducing into evidence a video of
the Honda Del Sol advertisement.
JUDGE: Please show it to the court clerk.
[MGM Lawyer shows a video disk to the clerk.]
COURT CLERK: I have entered this as Exhibit
Number One.
MGM LAWYER: Thank you. Ladies and
gentlemen, what you are about to see is the
Honda advertisement that is at issue during this
trial.
[video is played for the jury:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqa-b3assCA ]

MGM LAWYER: I would now like to call Hayden

Hunt.
[Hayden Hunt comes to the stand]
COURT CLERK: Raise your right hand. Do you
swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing but the truth?
HAYDEN HUNT: I do.
MGM LAWYER: Please tell the jury what you do
at MGM.
Trial Transcript p.2

James Bond in a Honda?

HAYDEN HUNT: Im an executive.
MGM LAWYER: And what did Metro Goldwyn do
when it found out about this ad?

JUDGE: You may step down from the witness

stand.
[Hayden Hunt returns to seat]

HAYDEN HUNT: We demanded that they not air

the ad.
MGM LAWYER: When was the ad scheduled to be
aired?
HAYDEN HUNT: During the Superbowl! The most
watched show all year!
MGM LAWYER: What did the defendants do when
you made your demand?

MGM LAWYER: I will now call Devon Dominic.

[Devon Dominic takes the stand]
COURT CLERK: Raise your right hand. Do you
swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing but the truth?
DEVON DOMINIC: I do.

HAYDEN HUNT: Nothing. Thats why we filed this

lawsuit.

MGM LAWYER: Tell us about your involvement

in the production of Hondas ad.

MGM LAWYER:
further.

DEVON DOMINIC [angrily]: I work at the ad

agency, but the ad had nothing to do with
James Bond.

Thank you.

I have nothing

JUDGE: Lawyer for the defendant, do you have

any questions for this witness?
HONDA LAWYER: I do, Your Honor. [to Hayden
Hunt] You testified that Honda did nothing in
response to your request. But, in fact, it did do
something, didnt it? Honda changed its ad.
HAYDEN HUNT: If you can call that a change.
HONDA LAWYER:
Didnt they change the
characters to speak with American accents
instead of British accents?
HAYDEN HUNT: Yes.
HONDA LAWYER: And didnt they change the
music so it would have fewer horns?
HAYDEN HUNT: Yes, but

MGM LAWYER: Please limit your answer to the

questions I ask you. So, did you work on the
Honda ad?
DEVON DOMINIC [disrespectfully]: Part of it.
MGM LAWYER: And when your agency was
working on the ideas for this ad, at one point
the project was named James Bob, wasnt it?
HONDA LAWYER: Objection. Leading question.
JUDGE: Overruled. The witness is hostile.
MGM LAWYER:
James Bob?

Was the project ever named

DEVON DOMINIC: Yes.

HONDA LAWYER: Nothing further, your honor.

MGM LAWYER: And what did you understand

the name James Bob to mean?

JUDGE [to MGM Lawyer]: Re-direct?

DEVON DOMINIC: [shrugs]

MGM LAWYER: When Honda changed the music

and the characters accents, was that enough to
satisfy your company?

MGM LAWYER: Please give a verbal answer for

the court reporter.

HAYDEN HUNT: No way. It still plays out just like

James Bond. Its got that same look. That
same feel, you know?
MGM LAWYER: Thank you. Nothing further.

DEVON DOMINIC: I dont know what it meant.

MGM LAWYER [sarcastically]: You had no idea
what a high-action film sequence called James
Bob might possibly refer to?
DEVON DOMINIC: Not really.
Trial Transcript p.3

James Bond in a Honda?

MGM LAWYER: In your deposition, you said you
understood the name James Bob to be a play
on words referring to James Bond.

MGM LAWYER: Withdrawn. Nothing further.

JUDGE: You may step down.

DEVON DOMINIC: I dont remember that.

MGM LAWYER: Would it help if you looked at a
transcript of your deposition?

MGM LAWYER: I would now like to call Sandy

Smith.

DEVON DOMINIC: Maybe.

[Sandy Smith comes to the stand]

MGM LAWYER [gets papers off the table]: Your

Honor, I would like to show the witness this
transcript to refresh the memory.

COURT CLERK: Raise your right hand. Do you

swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing but the truth?

JUDGE: You may approach.

SANDY SMITH: I do.

[MGM Lawyer hands transcript to Devon Dominic.

Devon Dominic reads transcript, hands it back.]

MGM LAWYER: Please tell the jury about your

role in producing Hondas ad.

MGM LAWYER:
Now, is it true that you
understood the name James Bob to be a play
on words for James Bond?

SANDY SMITH: I was the casting director.

DEVON DOMINIC: Apparently so.

MGM LAWYER:
your honor.

Thank you.

MGM LAWYER: So you were asked to find actors

to star in this advertisement?
SANDY SMITH: Yes.

Nothing further,

JUDGE: Cross?

MGM LAWYER:
When you contacted talent
agencies looking for actors, what kind of actors
did you tell the agencies you were looking for?

HONDA LAWYER: How long was the project

named James Bob?

SANDY SMITH: I told them I needed actors that

looked like James Bond.

DEVON DOMINIC: Not long at all. We dropped

that name very soon into the project.

MGM LAWYER: Was that all you said?

HONDA LAWYER: Thank you. Nothing further.

JUDGE: Re-direct?
MGM LAWYER: Why do you think the name was
dropped?
HONDA LAWYER:
speculation.

Objection.

Calls

for

JUDGE: Sustained.
MGM LAWYER:
At the agency, was there
discussion about why that name should be
changed?
DEVON DOMINIC: Yes. It didnt fit the project.
MGM LAWYER: Dont you mean it fit the project
too well?
HONDA LAWYER: Objection, Your Honor.

SANDY SMITH: Yeah. I told them I needed to

cast an actor who looked like he could star in
the next James Bond film.
MGM LAWYER: Why not ask for an actor who
looked like Arnold Schwarzenegger or Bruce
Willis?
SANDY SMITH: That kind of actor would not have
fit the ad.
MGM LAWYER: Thank you. Nothing further.
JUDGE: Any questions from the defense?
HONDA LAWYER: Yes, Your Honor. The actual
actor chosen for the ad was blonder than any
of the actors who have played James Bond,
correct?
SANDY SMITH: Yes, thats correct. The James
Bond actors all had darker hair.
Trial Transcript p.4

James Bond in a Honda?

HONDA LAWYER: Thank you. Nothing further.
JUDGE: You may step down. Next witness?

HONDA LAWYER: Yes, Your Honor. [to Avery

Adams] Are James Bond films the only films in
which a helicopter has ever chased a car?
AVERY ADAMS: Well, I dont know. Probably not.

MGM LAWYER: I would now like to call Avery

Adams to the stand.
[Avery Adams comes to the stand]
COURT CLERK: Raise your right hand. Do you
swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing but the truth?

HONDA LAWYER: And is Dr. No the only film

ever created with a villain who has metal
hands?
AVERY ADAMS: I doubt it.
HONDA LAWYER: Edward Scissorhands was not
a James Bond film, was it?

AVERY ADAMS: I do.

AVERY ADAMS: No.

MGM LAWYER: Please tell us about yourself.

HONDA LAWYER:
questions.

AVERY ADAMS: Im a writer. I wrote a book

about James Bond films called The Amazing
Universe of 007.
MGM LAWYER: Would you call yourself a James
Bond expert?
AVERY ADAMS: Certainly. Ive been on lots of
radio and TV shows talking about James Bond.

Thank you.

No further

JUDGE: Mr. Adams, you may step down.

MGM LAWYER: As my last witness, I would like

to call Professor Casey.
[Professor Casey comes to the stand]

MGM LAWYER: Tell the jury whether, in your

opinion, Hondas advertisement copies the
James Bond idea.

COURT CLERK: Raise your right hand. Do you

swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing but the truth?

AVERY ADAMS: I believe it does. In some ways,

it flat-out steals ideas from Bond movies. The
most obvious example is the helicopter chase in
The Spy Who Loved Me. Bond and a woman
are driving down the road in a sports car when
theyre suddenly attacked by helicopters.
Hondas ad is the same thing: A man who
looks like Bond, driving down the road with a
woman, and they are attacked by helicopters.

PROF. CASEY: I do.

MGM LAWYER: I see. Anything else?

PROF. CASEY: Yes, exactly.

AVERY ADAMS: Sure. In the Bond film Dr. No,

the villain had metal hands.
In Hondas
commercial, the villains hands make clanging
noises as they scrape the car.

MGM LAWYER:
Sounds like my kind of
education. Tell us, professor, what is your
opinion of Hondas advertisement?

MGM LAWYER:
Nothing further.

Interesting.

JUDGE: Cross-examination?

Thank you.

MGM LAWYER: Tell us about yourself, Professor

Casey.
PROF. CASEY: Im a university professor. Last
spring I taught a course about James Bond
films.
MGM LAWYER:
A class about James Bond
movies? At the University?

PROF. CASEY: I think it steals the essence of

what James Bond is all about.
MGM LAWYER: Explain that to us in terms we
can understand.

Trial Transcript p.5

James Bond in a Honda?

PROF. CASEY: Well, all James Bond movies have
certain things in common.
Theres Bond
himself, of course, but other elements are the
same too. All the films have the same fast
pace, the same kinds of exotic settings, the
same kinds of grotesque villains. The same
mood.

HONDA LAWYER: So you would agree that the

sight of James Bond driving a Honda might be
. . . strange.

MGM LAWYER: Mood?

PROF. CASEY: James Bond films have a unique
feel to them. Things like the music and the
dialogue contribute to that. Hondas ad has all
of it: The pace, the music, the witty dialogue.
The ad has the same mood as a Bond film.

HONDA LAWYER: But would you agree it is

possible
that,
if
someone
made
an
advertisement with a character who looked like
James Bond and that character was driving a
Honda instead of some high-tech expensive car,
that ad might be intended to be funny?

MGM LAWYER: Thank you.

PROF. CASEY: I suppose it could, but

HONDA LAWYER: Professor, would you say that

Hondas ad is exactly the same as a James
Bond film?

HONDA LAWYER:
questions.

PROF. CASEY: Not exactly, no.

MGM LAWYER: Just one question, Your Honor.

Professor, having seen and studied all of the
James Bond films, was there anything about
the Honda ad that struck you as making fun of
James Bond films?

HONDA LAWYER: Certain things are different. For

example, it struck me that the color tone of the
Honda ad was different from the color tone of
James Bond films.
PROF. CASEY: Well, yes. The ad has a more
sepia tone. That gives everything a brownish
cast.
HONDA LAWYER: And James Bond films do not
have a sepia tone?
PROF. CASEY: No.
HONDA LAWYER: But there are more obvious
differences too, arent there.

PROF. CASEY: I suppose so.

HONDA LAWYER: Amusing, even?
PROF. CASEY: In a real Bond film? No.

Thank you.

No further

JUDGE: Re-direct?

PROF. CASEY: Not that I could see, no.

MGM LAWYER: Thank you.
JUDGE: Does plaintiffs counsel have anything
further to present?
MGM LAWYER: No, Your Honor.
JUDGE: Is defense counsel ready to proceed?

PROF. CASEY: Yes. Its not the same villain or

the same car.

HONDA LAWYER: Yes, Your Honor. I would like

to begin by calling Morgan Matsuda.

HONDA LAWYER: Definitely not the same car.

[Morgan Matsuda comes to the stand]

PROF. CASEY: No.

COURT CLERK: Do you swear to tell the truth,

the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

HONDA LAWYER: Have you ever known James

Bond to drive a Honda in any of the James
Bond films?
PROF. CASEY: Definitely not. He drives very
expensive cars. BMWs, Aston Martins, things
like that. Lots of high-tech gadgetry.

MORGAN MATSUDA: I do.

HONDA LAWYER: Please tell the jury about your
role in the ad.

Trial Transcript p.6

James Bond in a Honda?

MORGAN MATSUDA: Im the vice president of the
advertising agency that was hired by Honda to
create an advertising campaign.
HONDA LAWYER: So, who originally came up
with the idea for this ad?
MORGAN MATSUDA: I did.
HONDA LAWYER: Did you get the idea from a
James Bond movie?
MORGAN MATSUDA: Not at all. In fact, I got the
idea after watching the movie Aliensyou
know that part where the alien gets thrown out
of the spaceship, but hes still hanging on to the
spaceships door?

MORGAN MATSUDA: No.

MGM LAWYER: I have no more questions. [sits
down]
JUDGE: You may leave the stand.
[Morgan Matsuda returns to seat.]

HONDA LAWYER: I would like to call Jamie Jones

to the stand.
[Jamie Jones takes the stand.]
HONDA LAWYER:
do.

Please tell the jury what you

HONDA LAWYER: Yeah. That was a good scene.

So, no part of your idea for the ad came from a
James Bond film?

JAMIE JONES: Im an executive at Honda.

MORGAN MATSUDA: None.

JAMIE JONES: Yes.

HONDA LAWYER: Thank you.

HONDA LAWYER: What kind of actors did you tell

the casting director to look for?

JUDGE: Cross-examination?
MGM LAWYER:
Bond film?

Have you ever seen a James

MORGAN MATSUDA: Only bits and pieces. Here

and there.
MGM LAWYER: Bits and pieces?
MORGAN MATSUDA:
Yes.
television. Flipping channels.

You know, on

MGM LAWYER: So you have seen a James Bond

film, at least in part.
MORGAN MATSUDA: Yes.
MGM LAWYER: Are you aware that in your
deposition before the trial you kept referring to
the actor in the ad as James?
MORGAN MATSUDA: Yes.
MGM LAWYER: Why?
MORGAN MATSUDA: This whole law suit has had
me confused. It was easier to call him James
so everyone knew who I was talking about.
MGM LAWYER: It wasnt because the actor was
supposed to be like James Bond?

HONDA LAWYER: And you were involved in the

idea for this advertisement?

JAMIE JONES: We told him to get actors that

looked like characters from the movie The
Avengers.
HONDA LAWYER:
James Bond?

Not actors that looked like

JAMIE JONES: No.

HONDA LAWYER: And just so were clear, is The
Avengers a James Bond movie?
JAMIE JONES: No, its not.
HONDA LAWYER: And what about this hero with
metal hands?
JAMIE JONES: The villain in the ad does not have
metal hands. His hands are completely normal.
He was wearing gloves.
HONDA LAWYER: His gloves were responsible for
the clanging noise?
JAMIE JONES: Yes.
HONDA LAWYER: So, did Honda set out to create
an ad that copied James Bond?

Trial Transcript p.7

James Bond in a Honda?

JAMIE JONES: Not at all. Look. If anything, its
a spoof. A parody. Its making fun of James
Bond, not copying him.
HONDA LAWYER: Can you explain to the jury
what you mean? Youre not admitting you
copied James Bond, are you?
JAMIE JONES: Not at all. What we did was try to
make an ad that was like an action film. We
were kind of poking fun at action films. And
who better to poke fun at than James Bond?
HONDA LAWYER: Did you think making a parody
would sell cars?

TAYLOR TRENT: I do.

HONDA LAWYER: Tell us what you do for a living.
TAYLOR TRENT: Im a film writer and producer.
HONDA LAWYER: So youve written action films?
TAYLOR TRENT: A screenplay, yes.
HONDA LAWYER:
Bond films?

Are you familiar with James

TAYLOR TRENT: Absolutely. Im a huge James

Bond fan. Ive been watching Bond movies
since 1959.

HONDA LAWYER: Thank you. Nothing further.

HONDA LAWYER: So if you saw a piece of film

that was intended to copy a James Bond film,
would you be able to recognize that?

JUDGE: Cross?

TAYLOR TRENT: Sure.

JAMIE JONES: Sure. People love funny ads.

MGM LAWYER:
dont they?

People also love James Bond,

JAMIE JONES: Im sure they do.

MGM LAWYER:
And so Honda used James
Bonds appeal to sell cars?
JAMIE JONES: No, thats not what I mean. Im
just saying that if there are any elements of a
James Bond movie in that advertisement, its
only to make fun of James bond.
MGM LAWYER: So you admit there are elements
of James Bond in the ad.
JAMIE JONES: The only thing Im admitting is
that we were making fun of action films.
MGM LAWYER: I see. Nothing further.
JUDGE: Thank you. You may step down.
[Jamie Jones returns to seat.]

HONDA LAWYER: As my last witness, I would like

to call Taylor Trent.
[Taylor Trent comes to the stand.]
COURT CLERK: Raise your right hand. Do you
swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing but the truth?

HONDA LAWYER:
And what about this
advertisement were in court about today?
Youve had a chance to see that, right? We all
saw it today.
TAYLOR TRENT: Yes. Ive watched it several
times, and in my opinion it is not trying to copy
James Bond.
HONDA LAWYER: What makes you say that?
TAYLOR TRENT: Its not Bond. Its just a generic
action scene with a regular action hero like you
might see in any action movie.
HONDA LAWYER: Were there any elements in the
ad that you would consider to be uniquely
James Bond?
TAYLOR TRENT: No.
HONDA LAWYER: Thank you.
JUDGE: Cross?
MGM LAWYER: You say youve been a fan of
James Bond for many years, is that right?
TAYLOR TRENT: Yes.
MGM LAWYER: Have you written any books
about James Bond?
TAYLOR TRENT: No.
MGM LAWYER: Published any articles? Been a
guest on any radio or TV shows?
Trial Transcript p.8

James Bond in a Honda?

TAYLOR TRENT: No.
MGM LAWYER:
films?

Have you studied James Bond

TAYLOR TRENT: Ive seen a lot of them.

MGM LAWYER: Have you made a scholarly study
of them?
TAYLOR TRENT: Well, not really.
MGM LAWYER: But youre a fan.
TAYLOR TRENT: Definitely.
MGM LAWYER: Thank you. Nothing further, Your
Honor. And I have no more witnesses.

HONDA LAWYER: Ladies and gentlemen, think

closely about the testimony you heard today.
First, you heard that Honda made an effort to
change its ad as soon as MGM objected to it.
But that wasnt enough for MGM. You also
heard MGMs experts admit that helicopter
chases are not unique to James Bond movies,
and that James Bond has never driven a Honda
in any of his movies. The man who came up
with the idea for the ad has never seen
anything more than bits and pieces of a James
Bond movie. Does this evidence show that
Honda copied James Bond? I think you know
the answer.

JUDGE: Does the defendant have any more

witnesses?
HONDA LAWYER: No, Your Honor.
JUDGE: Then are we ready to proceed to closing
arguments?
MGM LAWYER: Yes, Your Honor.
HONDA LAWYER: Yes, Your Honor.
JUDGE: Proceed when youre ready.

MGM LAWYER: Ladies and gentlemen of the

jury, lets think for a moment about what you
heard today. The vice president of Hondas ad
agency said he got the idea for this ad from the
movie Aliens.
Yet for some reason, his
casting director was asking for actors that
looked like James Bond. Hondas executive told
you the ad was just making fun of James Bond.
Did you see anything funny? Meanwhile, you
heard a university professor tell you that the
most important elements found in James Bond
moviesthe pace, the music, and the
dialoguewere copied by this ad. Ladies and
gentlemen, you must decide which one is
correct.

Trial Transcript p.9