Unit 2 Lab
Unit 2 Lab
As for safety precautions, the regular rules apply, such as closed toe shoes and being careful with
not dropping the heavy metal railing. Other than that, there should be no safety issues with this
lab.
Data, Observations, Calculations
Distance VS Time Data Table
Distance (m)
Trial 1 (s)
Trial 2 (s)
Trial 3 (s)
Average
Velocity
1/2 average
time (s)
10
.716028
0.748082
0.61757
.693893
14.4114
0.346992
20
0.993609
0.94785
0.966029
.969163
20.6364
0.484582
30
1.305134
1.432341
1.35323
1.36357
22.0011
0.681785
40
1.632102
1.578773
1.587825
1.59957
25.0067
0.799785
50
1.79843
1.787393
1.849135
1.81165
27.5991
0.905825
60
1.989088
2.022712
1.993742
2.00185
29.9723
1.00093
70
2.135549
2.138378
2.156421
2.14345
32.6576
1.07173
80
2.308498
2.338956
2.310245
2.31923
34.4942
1.15962
90
2.484605
2.473695
2.517517
2.49194
36.1164
1.24597
100
2.609074
2.625477
2.601681
2.61208
38.2837
1.30604
Calculations:
(2.135549s+2.138378s+2.156421s)/3=2.14345s Average time for given distance
10cm/.693893s=14.4114cm/s finding velocity
Final Displacement(cm)=46.52cm/s*Time+-28.77cm
Displacement VS Average Time Squared
Final Displacement(cm)=13.88cm/s2*Time2+4.698cm
Velocity VS Average Time
Velocity VS Displacement
Final Velocity(cm/s)=.2491cm/s/cm*Displacement+14.42cm/s
Velocity Squared VS Displacement
Final Velocity2((cm/s)2)=13.61(cm/s)2/cm*Displacement(cm)+94.25(cm/s)2
Claims and Evidence
Gaga: Xf=1/2a(t2)+(Vi)t+Xi
Flava-Flav: Vf=a^t+Vi
Gma: Vf2=2a^X+Vi2
Our variables are Xf is final displacememt, a is acceleration, t is time, Vi initial velocity, Xi initial
displacement, Vf is final velocity, and X is displacement at that current time. Superscript of two
also means that that the variable is squared. To find acceleration, we used a formula looking like
this: (Vf-Vi)/t. This formula provided us with our acceleration, which we plugged into each
claimed theory equation with the other data we were given to prove that it all adds up. For
example, here is the work for Gaga: 100cm=1/2*(38.2837cm/s14.4114cm/s)(2.612082s)+(14.4114s)* (.693893s)+10cm. Step 1:
100cm=1/2*23.8723cm/s*6.82296s+9.9999cm+10cm. Step 2: 100=81.4398cm+19.9999cm.
Step 3:100cm=101.439cm. This proves that are theory equations do add up, the slight error is
just rounding errors.
Errors and Improvements
The wheels of the car get stuck every few center meters and put a drag or friction on the car,
slowing it slightly and disrupting our data. The table may have been at a slight angle causing the
cars velocity to show higher than it actually should have been; I believe this to be the case
because the car always tried to roll off the table when it was set down on the wheels. To improve
this, we could get either smoother wheels for the car, or we could get a rail that fit the wheels
perfectly causing no slight pulls on the car. To improve the slope of the table, we could use a
level too make sure that the table is not slanted, if it is we could do the experiment elsewhere.
Readings and reflections
Readings: The source stated that the kinematic equations are a set of four equations that can be
used to find information that we do not have at the time being relating to the objects motion. This
is only the case however if we are given all data except for one thing (what we will be solving
for). It then lists the equations that we used in class to find our theory equations.
Citation: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/1DKin/Lesson-6/kinematic-equations
Reflections: Through the experiment, I felt I had a pretty good idea of what was happening, and
what would happen in future steps of the experiment. As these became true, I did see some slight
variation from my expectations, such as how the velocity of the car increased significantly when
it started rolling. I also realized how important the general math used in labs is. When comparing
to another group, I realized how different all of their graphs were. What was so surprising was
that their given data was almost exactly the same, it was just their mathematical errors and
possibly their rounding that changed their graphs from what ours looked like. In future labs, I
will make sure I continue to be as precise as possible and check my math to prevent errors from
showing on my lab reports.