0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views3 pages

Cesaro Means.

This document proves the Cesaro means theorem, which states that if a sequence an converges to a limit a, then the sequence of averages bn also converges to a. The proof shows that for any epsilon greater than 0, there exists an N such that for all n greater than N, the difference between bn and a is less than epsilon. It does this by splitting the average bn into two parts, one involving terms from 1 to N and one from N+1 to n. It then uses the fact that an converges to a to bound each part separately and show their sum is less than epsilon.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views3 pages

Cesaro Means.

This document proves the Cesaro means theorem, which states that if a sequence an converges to a limit a, then the sequence of averages bn also converges to a. The proof shows that for any epsilon greater than 0, there exists an N such that for all n greater than N, the difference between bn and a is less than epsilon. It does this by splitting the average bn into two parts, one involving terms from 1 to N and one from N+1 to n. It then uses the fact that an converges to a to bound each part separately and show their sum is less than epsilon.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Proof of Cesaro Means

In order to show that our alternative definition of entropy rate:





H (X) = lim H Xn | X1 , . . . , Xn1
n

is equivalent to the canonical definition


1
H(X1 , . . . , Xn )
n n

H(X) = lim

when the stochastic process is stationary, we used the following theorem


Theorem Cesaro Means:

Let an a, let bn = n1 ni=1 ai , then
lim bn = a.

Proof Recall the meaning of limn bn = a:


For every > 0 there exists a n such that, for every n > nd elta, bn a < .
Now, since limn an = a, we know that , n such that n > n , |an a| <
.
Choose = 2 .
Fix, , determine n , let n >> n , and look at bn a.


 n 




 1
ai a
|bn a| = n


i=1


 n 


n 
 1
= n
ai a 

n

 i=1

n



 1

= n
na +
ai 


i=1


n


 1 

= n
(ai a)


i=1

Now divide the sum on the right hand side into two parts: the first is the
sum over the indexes between 1 and n , the second is the over the remaining
terms


n
1 



(ai a)
|bn a| = 
n

 i=1

n
1 




(ai a)
(1)
n

 i=1

n
1 



(2)
+
(ai a)
n

i=n +1

We are now going to bound the two sums (1) and (2).
First we bound (1)
 n

n

1 

1


(ai a)
|ai a|

n

n
i=1
i=1


1
n

max |aj a|
n i=1 j=1


1
1
= max |aj a|
j=1
n i=1
n
n
= max |aj a|
j=1
n

n

and, if we pick n satisfying



|aj a|
n maxnj=1
n>
,

then sum (1) satisfies

n





1

(ai a) <


n
i=1

Now we bound (2) using a similar trick




n
n
1 

1 


(ai a)
|ai a|

n

n
i=n +1
i=n +1


(3)
(4)

n
1 
n

max |ai a|
n i=n +1 i=n +1


n
1 
1
= max |ai a|
i=n +1
n i=n +1
n

n n
n
= max |ai a|
i=n +1
n
n
max |ai a|
i=n +1

(5)

where Inequality 5 is a consequence of how we selected n .


We have therefore shown that, if we fix , let = /2, determine n , there
n maxn |aj a|
such that, for all n > n , |bn a| < ;
exists a n =  j=1

In other words, we have shown that limn bn = a.

You might also like