Scribd
Upload
5K views

GCE A Level Grading Structure

The document discusses CIE's process for grading examinations and conducting grade reviews. It defines grading as deciding the marks needed for certain grades, while grade review involves re-marking scripts of candidates at risk of an incorrect grade. The process involves setting thousands of thresholds each year based on exam difficulty, candidate performance, and maintaining standards year-over-year. CIE combines statistical data with examiners' professional judgment and additional reviews to determine appropriate grade thresholds.

Uploaded by

muhammadkhanpk
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5K views

GCE A Level Grading Structure

The document discusses CIE's process for grading examinations and conducting grade reviews. It defines grading as deciding the marks needed for certain grades, while grade review involves re-marking scripts of candidates at risk of an incorrect grade. The process involves setting thousands of thresholds each year based on exam difficulty, candidate performance, and maintaining standards year-over-year. CIE combines statistical data with examiners' professional judgment and additional reviews to determine appropriate grade thresholds.

Uploaded by

muhammadkhanpk
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33

Grading and Grade Review

Christine Cayley
University of Cambridge International Examinations
www.cie.org.uk

Definitions
• Grading Process of deciding how many marks a
candidate needs in order to obtain a
certain grade
• Grade Review Process (before the issue of results)
of re-marking the scripts of
candidates thought most at risk of
obtaining a
wrong/inappropriate/indefensible grade.
www.cie.org.uk

We also produce grades at


component level, not just syllabus
level.
So how many thresholds does that amount to?
www.cie.org.uk

Thresholds determined, November


2005 (1)
• IGCSE: 63 syllabuses x say 4 components
(plus syllabus) x 8 thresholds = 2,520

• AS and A Level: 83 syllabuses x say 4


components (plus syllabus) x 6 thresholds =
2,490
www.cie.org.uk

Number of thresholds, Nov 2005 IG C S E


• AL
AICE
OL
AO
Total
AS
IGCSE
(between
2240
2832
558
392 218277
1880
375
PMs)
OL
IGCSE 2,520
OL 2,760 AO
AO 104
AS/AL 2,490 A S /A L
AL (Sing) 800
AL
Total 8,674 ( S in g )
(between 31 PMs)
www.cie.org.uk

So how do we convert marks into grades?

First, some things we DON’T do:

• Set a pass mark that is the same for everything


every year,
e.g. 50% for a pass, 65% for a B, 80% for an A.

• This is what some people think we do. Would make


life easy, but...
www.cie.org.uk

• Inappropriate across different subjects

• Inappropriate across different


sessions/papers

• so we don’t do that...
www.cie.org.uk

How do we convert marks into grades?


• Another thing we could do, but don’t, is to set a
QUOTA of candidates who are going to pass at each
grade, e.g. the top 10% will get an A, and so on.
• In 1970s guidelines for A Level said
– A for top 10%
– B for next 15%
– C for next 10%
– D for next 15%
– E for next 20%.
• but...
www.cie.org.uk

• Inappropriate for different subjects

• Could be unfair for candidates who happen to be in a


‘good’ year

• Especially difficult for global examinations

• Countries come and go from syllabuses


www.cie.org.uk

Cumulative % of candidates achieving Grade A or


E in certain A Level syllabuses, November 2005

J a p a n e s e ( S in g a p o r e )

B u s in e s s S t u d ie s

M a t h s ( S in g a p o r e )
A
M a th s (9 7 0 9 ) B to E

0 20 40 60 80 100
www.cie.org.uk

• If we’re not maintaining the marks,

• and we’re not maintaining the pass rate,

• what ARE we trying to maintain?


www.cie.org.uk

THE STANDARD!
www.cie.org.uk

The big question

• What is the lowest mark for which


the performance this year can be
deemed equivalent to that achieved
by candidates at the lowest mark
for the same grade last year?
www.cie.org.uk

The PEs’ recommendations


• Each Principal Examiner makes recommendations for the
answer to this question on Form SRS.
• They can state a range of marks /a tolerance.
• They have archive scripts.
• We remind them of last year’s thresholds.
www.cie.org.uk

• HARDER paper should mean LOWER thresholds.

• BETTER candidature should mean HIGHER pass RATE.


www.cie.org.uk

Judgemental thresholds (1)


• However, not for all the thresholds, just for certain ‘key’
(or ‘judgemental’) ones, i.e:
• A Level: A, B, E
• O (and AO) Level: A, C, E
• IGCSE A, C, E, F
• We sort these out and let arithmetic (and EPS) suggest
the rest.
www.cie.org.uk

Is that it?
• No, because we don’t just do what PEs recommend.
• Why not?

– Because sometimes their recommendations are


inconsistent

– Because they don’t know what the outcome of


their recommendations is going to be in terms of
% of candidates getting through
www.cie.org.uk

Basis of CIE grading


CIE grading is based on
• statistical evidence
combined with the
• PEs’ professional judgement
as sorted out by
• the professional judgement of the Product Manager.

To do this, sometimes we have a Meeting.


www.cie.org.uk

Setting Grade C threshold


Candidates had to do Papers 3, 4 and 6 if entered for the ‘Extended’ option

m ax m ark C threshold
Paper 3 40 25
Paper 4 80 35
Paper 6 40 20
Total 160 80
www.cie.org.uk

Setting Grade C threshold (2)

• So overall a candidate needed 80 out of 160 to be


awarded a C?

• NO, not quite...


www.cie.org.uk

Setting Grade C threshold (3)


• That would have been true if we had just used the
‘Indicator 1’ method of adding up the thresholds for
the components, which means…

• …. adding up the thresholds for the components.

• But that’s too easy.


www.cie.org.uk

Setting Grade C threshold


36.4% of candidates would get a C overall if we took a threshold of 80.
% of candidates with C or above in different components (1)

0455/03 35.7

0455/04 42.2

0455/06 40.7

average 39.5

weighted average 40.2

MARK obtained by top 40.2% 77


www.cie.org.uk

Putting components together

• So we took 77, not 80.


• 77 was the ‘Indicator 2’ mark obtained by the
‘weighted average’ method.
• We calculate both ‘Indicator 1’ and ‘Indicator 2’ and
use the lower.
www.cie.org.uk

Order of setting thresholds


• We set each key grade on each component for a
syllabus,
• then set the key grades on the syllabus (or syllabus
option),
• then check what we have done looking at various
countries as well as the overall figures,
• then set the arithmetic boundaries,
• then check that they look right,
www.cie.org.uk

Grading Confirmation

• then pass it over to the Standards and Projects


Manager for a further check,
• and to CIE’s Accountable Officer for another look.
www.cie.org.uk

The complications
No use carrying forward last year’s standard if
we think:
•Subjects at the same level really were harder
than one another
Or
•We are out of line with our UK equivalent
Or
•June is easier/harder than November
www.cie.org.uk

Syllabus pairs (1)


• These are a way of comparing different subjects.
• We don’t necessarily expect the same percentage pass
rates in Economics and Principles of Accounting because
the field of candidates will not be the same.
• However, we could isolate those candidates who did
BOTH Economics and Principles of Accounting and, if we
had enough candidates, we might expect them to do
more or less equally well on the two.
www.cie.org.uk

Syllabus pairs (2)

• If we found the same candidates did a lot better in


Economics, we might take another pair, say
Economics and Maths, and another, and so on, to
check whether Economics was too easy.
www.cie.org.uk

Grade Review

• This is a further check, after Grading, that candidates


are likely to be given the right grade.

• It involves the re-marking of some candidates’


scripts.
www.cie.org.uk

Grade Review criteria

• They are likely to be re-marked if they are just below a


grade threshold and
– were forecast a significantly higher grade OR
– did much better on one component than another OR
– were marked by a ‘lingering doubt Examiner’ OR
– are in a Centre that is doing much less well than
forecast or than last year.
• We also sample all Examiners.
www.cie.org.uk

• So Grade Review is not like Grading.

• Senior Examiners come and mark scripts, and the


Product Manager:
– uses EPS to select the scripts in the first place,
– cuts the coat according to the cloth,
– gets the re-marking Examiners to follow up
anything odd and be dynamic,
– tries not to get grumpy.
www.cie.org.uk

Why does it matter?


• It’s the culmination of the work of CIE to which we all
contribute.
– Syllabus must be ‘right’
– Question Paper must be ‘right’
– Mark scheme must be ‘right’
– Marking must be ‘right’
– but Grading must be right too.
www.cie.org.uk

You might also like