Practice Pat Part A
Practice Pat Part A
Contacts
Learner Assessment Achievement Testing Branch Phone OR toll-free FAX Mailing Address 780-427-0010 310-0000, then dial or ask for 780-427-0010 780-422-4474 Alberta Education Box 43 44 Capital Boulevard 10044 108 Street NW Edmonton, Alberta T5J 5E6
E-mail Addresses Achievement Testing Branch Director Grade 9 Humanities Examination Manager Grade 9 Humanities Examiner Other Information Follow these steps for easy access to the Alberta Education website: Step 1: Type education.alberta.ca Step 2: Click on Teachers Step 3: Under Additional Programs and Services, click on Provincial Testing Step 4: Under School and School Authority Results, click on Achievement Tests On the Achievement Tests web page, there is a specific link to Subject Bulletins. These bulletins provide students and teachers with information about the achievement tests scheduled for the current school year. Please share the contents of the Grade 9 English Language Arts Subject Bulletin with your students. Also on this web page is a specific link to Examples of the Standards for Students Writing. These samples are intended to be used to enhance students writing and to assist teachers inassessing student writing relative to the standards embedded in the scoring criteria in thescoring guides.
Copyright 2010, the Crown in Right of Alberta, as represented by the Minister of Education, Alberta Education, Learner Assessment, 44 Capital Boulevard, 10044 108 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 5E6, and its licensors. All rights reserved. Special permission is granted to Alberta educators only to reproduce, for educational purposes and on a non-profit basis, parts of this document that do not contain excerpted material. Excerpted material in this document shall not be reproduced without the written permission of the original publisher (see credits, where applicable).
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements...............................................................................................................1 Introduction...........................................................................................................................2 Maintaining Consistent Standards........................................................................................4 Local Marking. ......................................................................................................................5 Scoring Guide: Narrative/Essay Writing Assignment. ........................................................7 Part A: Writing Description and Instructions. .................................................................12 Assignment I: Narrative/Essay Writing............................................................................13 Observations from Standards Confirmation and Central Marking 2010............................15 Student Exemplar Satisfactory (Essay)............................................................................21 Rationale for Student Exemplar Satisfactory (Essay)......................................................24 Student Exemplar Satisfactory (Narrative)......................................................................27 Rationale for Student Exemplar Satisfactory (Narrative)................................................30 Student Exemplar Proficient (Essay)...............................................................................33 Rationale for Student Exemplar Proficient (Essay).........................................................38 Student Exemplar Proficient (Narrative). .........................................................................41 Rationale for Student Exemplar Proficient (Narrative). ...................................................45 Student Exemplar Excellent (Essay). ...............................................................................48 Rationale for Student Exemplar Excellent (Essay). .........................................................52 Student Exemplar Excellent (Narrative)..........................................................................56 Rationale for Student Exemplar Excellent (Narrative)....................................................63 Appendix: Marker Training Papers....................................................................................67 Marker Training Paper A (Essay).......................................................................................68 Rationale for Marker Training Paper A (Essay).................................................................71 Marker Training Paper B (Narrative)..................................................................................73 Rationale for Marker Training Paper B (Narrative)............................................................77
Acknowledgements
Publication of this document would not have been possible without the permission of the students whose writing is presented. The cooperation of these students has allowed Alberta Education both to continue defining the standards of writing performance expected in connection with achievement tests and to continue demonstrating approaches taken by students in their writing. This document includes the valuable contributions of many educators. Sincere thanks and appreciation are extended to the following teachers who served as members of the respective working groups: Exemplar SelectionCharlene Baxter, Lori Bradford, Pat Galandie, AnnGibbs, Angie Hryhoryshyn, Susan Lee, and Sherry Lefebvre; Exemplar Validation RuthBernadas-Tymko, Rachel Booker, Nicole Orr, Gary Perfect, Marcie Perdue, Tracy Melnyk, Beth Worsfold, and Kalinda Wiebe; and Standards ConfirmationMelissaDeStefanisKing, KatherynGoods, SharonMacFadyen, Charl MacPherson, Paul Monaghan, Laurie Paddock, Derek Peddle, and Heather Scott. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions made by members of the Achievement Testing Branch and the Document Design and Desktop Publishing Unit of Learner Assessment, Alberta Education.
Introduction
The written responses in this document are examples of Grade 9 English Language Arts writing that meet or exceed the acceptable standard for student achievement. Along with the commentaries that accompany them, they should help teachers and students to understand the standards for the Grade 9 English Language Arts Part A: Writing Achievement Test in relation to the scoring criteria. The purpose of the sample responses is to illustrate the standards that governed the 2010 marking session and that anchor the selection of similar sample responses for marking sessions in subsequent years. The sample papers and commentaries were used to train markers to apply the scoring criteria consistently and to justify their decisions about scores in terms of each students work and the scoring criteria. The sample responses included in this document represent a very small sample of successful approaches to the Narrative / Essay Writing Assignment. Cautions 1. The commentaries are brief. The commentaries were written for groups of markers to discuss and apply during the marking session. Although brief, they provide a model for relating specific examples from student work to the details in a specific scoring criterion. 2. N either the scoring guide nor the assignment is meant to limit students to a single organizational or rhetorical approach in completing any achievement test assignment. Students must be free to select and organize their material in a manner that they feel will enable them to best present their ideas. In fact, part of what is being assessed is the final effectiveness of the content, the form and structure, and the rhetorical choices that students make. The student writing in this document illustrates just a few of the many successful organizational and rhetorical strategies used by students. We strongly recommend that you caution your students that there is no preferred approach to an assignment except that which enables the student to communicate his or her own ideas about the topic effectively. We advise you not to draw any conclusions about common patterns of approach taken by students. 3. T he sample papers presented in this document must not be used as models for instructional purposes. Because these papers are only illustrations of sample responses to a set topic, students must be cautioned neither to memorize their content nor to use them when either completing classroom assignments or writing future achievement tests. The approaches taken by students at the standard of excellence, not their words or ideas, are what students being examined in the future should emulate. In fact, it is hoped that the variety of approaches presented here will inspire students to experiment with diction, syntax, and form and structure as a way of developing an individual voice and engaging the reader in ideas and forms that the student has considered. Examination markers and staff at Alberta Education take plagiarism and cheating seriously.
Introduction
4. I t is essential that each of these examples of student writing be considered in light of the constraints of the examination situation. Under examination conditions, students produce first-draft writing. Given more time, they would be expected to produce papers of considerably improved quality, particularly in the dimensions of Sentence Structure, Vocabulary, and Conventions. 5. F or further information regarding student performance on Part A: Writing of the Grade 9 English Language Arts Achievement Test, access the Grade 9 English Language Arts 2010 Assessment Highlights document that is posted on the Alberta Education website. Suggestions To provide each paper with the most accurate and impartial judgment possible, use only the scoring criteria and the standards set by the Exemplars and Rationales. Each student is a person trying to do his or her very best. All students are completely reliant on your careful, professional consideration of their work. Markers are responsible for reviewing and internalizing the scoring criteria and their application to student writing applying the scoring criteria impartially, independently, and consistently to all papers refraining from marking a response if personal biasessuch as the students handwriting, development of topic, idiosyncrasies of voice, and/or political or religious preference interfere with an impartial judgment of the response ensuring that every paper is scored fairly according to the scoring criteria in accordance with the standards reflected in the Exemplars and Rationales The scores awarded to students papers must be based solely on the scoring criteria with reference to the Exemplars and Rationales. Fairness to all students is the most important requirement of the marking process. To facilitate fair and valid assessment of all student work during both local and central marking, teachers must not mark or write in student booklets. Teacher-created scoring sheets, which may be used during local marking, are not to be included in student test booklets. To assess locally those students with special test-writing needs, specifically a scribed response (test accommodation 5) or a taped response (test accommodation 10), teachers are to refrain from scoring Conventions for Assignment I: Narrative / Essay Writing as well as Content Management for Assignment II: Functional Writing. Please feel free to contact Learner Assessment staff members to discuss any questions or concerns.
Local Marking
Classroom teachers are encouraged to assess students writing, using the Scoring Guides, Exemplars, and Rationales that are sent to the schools along with the Part A: Writing tests, before returning the tests to Alberta Education. All papers are scored centrally in Edmonton in July. Scores awarded locally can be submitted to Alberta Education, where they will be used as the first reading of a students response. Local markers are to use the For Teacher Use Only section on the back of each Part A: Writing test booklet to record their scores by filling in the appropriate circles. The School Code and Accommodations Used sections should also be completed (see accommodations in the General Information Bulletin for information). If a teacher wants to know how his or her locally awarded scores compare with the scores that the tests received when scored centrally, then he or she must create a three-digit identification number and enter it in the section labelled ID No. on the back of each student booklet. No two teachers from the same school should create and use the same ID number. No other marks are to be made in the test booklet by the teacher. Tests are to be returned to Alberta Education according to the scheduling information in the online General Information Bulletin. The tests will then be scored centrally by Alberta Education as the second reading. Both sets of scores are used when calculating each students final mark. In the case of a discrepancy between these two sets of scores, papers will receive a third reading, which will determine the final scores that a paper is awarded. In this way, valid and reliable individual and group results can be reported. Papers that are not assessed locally by teachers will be scored centrally only once. After central marking has been completed and school reports have been sent to the schools, teachers who submitted their scores with an ID number will receive a confidential report on their marking. This report is called the Local Marker Report and includes the locally awarded scores, centrally awarded scores, third-read scores if applicable, and the final scores assigned. Teachers may make photocopies of student writing from only the English Language Arts PartA: Writing tests for inclusion in portfolios of the years work. Copies can be made for parents who request them. The Exemplars of student writing and the corresponding Rationales in this document exemplify the standards inherent in the scoring criteria. The levels of student achievement in the scoring guides are identified by specific words to describe student achievement in each scoring category. Classroom teachers are encouraged to discuss and use the scoring criteria with their students during the year. To determine a students mark, convert the word descriptors to the following numeric values: Excellent = 5, Proficient = 4, Satisfactory = 3, Limited = 2, Poor = 1.
Local Marking
A total score for a students written response may be calculated by a teacher using the following procedure. For the Narrative/Essay Writing Assignment, assign a score of 1 to 5 for each of Content, Organization, Sentence Structure, Vocabulary, and Conventions. Then, multiply the scores for Content and Organization by 2 as these categories are worth twice as much as the other categories. The maximum score possible for Narrative/Essay Writing is 35. For the Functional Writing Assignment, assign a score of 1 to 5 for each of Content and Content Management. Then, multiply these scores by 2. The maximum score possible for Functional Writing is 20. To calculate the Total Part A: Writing Score, add the Narrative/Essay Writing and Functional Writing scores as follows: Narrative/Essay Writing /35 (63.6%) + Functional Writing /20 (36.4%) = Total Score /55 (100%). The mark for Part A: Writing is worth 50% of the total mark for the Grade 9 English Language Arts Achievement Test. Because students responses to the Narrative/Essay Writing Assignment vary widelyfrom philosophical discussions to personal narratives to creative approachesassessment of the Narrative/Essay Writing Assignment on the achievement test will be in the context of Louise Rosenblatts suggestion that the evaluation of the answers would be in terms of the amount of evidence that the youngster has actually read something and thought about it, not a question of whether, necessarily, he has thought about it the way an adult would, or given an adults correct answer.
Rosenblatt, Louise. The Readers Contribution in the Literary Experience: Interview with Louise Rosenblatt. By Lionel Wilson. English Quarterly 14, no. 1 (Spring, 1981): 312.
Consider also Grant P. Wiggins suggestion to assess students writing with the tact of Socrates: tact to respect the students ideas enough to enter them fullyeven more fully than the thinker sometimesand thus the tact to accept apt but unanticipatable or unique responses.
Wiggins, Grant P. Assessing Student Performance: Exploring the Purpose and Limits of Testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993, p. 40.
To facilitate fair and valid assessment of all students during both local and central marking, teachers must not mark or write in student booklets. Teacher-created scoring sheets, which may be used during local marking, are not to be included in student test booklets. To assess locally those students with special test-writing needs, specifically a scribed response (test accommodation 5) or a taped response (test accommodation 10), teachers are to refrain from scoring Conventions for Assignment I: Narrative/Essay Writing as well as Content Management for Assignment II: Functional Writing.
The students exploration of the topic is insightful and/or imaginative. The students purpose, whether stated or implied, is deliberate. The ideas presented by the student are perceptive and/or carefully chosen. Supporting details are precise and/or original. The writing is confident and/or creative and holds the readers interest. The students exploration of the topic is adept and/or plausible. The students purpose, whether stated or implied, is intentional. The ideas presented by the student are thoughtful and/or sound. Supporting details are specific and/or apt. The writing is considered and/or elaborated and draws the readers interest. The students exploration of the topic is clear and/or logical. The students purpose, whether stated or implied, is evident. The ideas presented by the student are appropriate and/or predictable. Supporting details are relevant and/or generic. The writing is straightforward and/or generalized and occasionally appeals to the readers interest. The students exploration of the topic is tenuous and/or simplistic. The students purpose, whether stated or implied, is vague. The ideas presented by the student are superficial and/or ambiguous. Supporting details are imprecise and/or abbreviated. The writing is uncertain and/or incomplete and does not appeal to the readers interest. The students exploration of the topic is minimal and/or tangential. The students purpose, whether stated or implied, is insubstantial. The ideas presented by the student are overgeneralized and/or underdeveloped. Supporting details are irrelevant and/or scant. The writing is confusing and/or lacks validity and does not interest the reader. The marker can discern no evidence of an attempt to address the task presented in the assignment, or the student has written so little that it is not possible to assess Content.
Proficient
Pf S
Satisfactory
Limited
L P
Poor
INS
Insufficient
Note: Content and Organization are weighted to be worth twice as much as the other scoring categories.
Student work must address the task presented in the assignment. Responses that are completely unrelated to the topic and/or prompts will be awarded a score of Insufficient. 7
Excellent
The introduction is engaging and skillfully establishes a focus that is consistently sustained. Events and/or details are developed in a judicious order, and coherence is maintained. Transitions, either explicit or implicit, fluently connect events and/or details within sentences and/or between paragraphs. Closure is effective and related to the focus. The introduction is purposeful and clearly establishes a focus that is capably sustained. Events and/or details are developed in a sensible order, and coherence is generally maintained. Transitions, either explicit or implicit, clearly connect events and/or details within sentences and/or between paragraphs. Closure is appropriate and related to the focus. The introduction is functional and establishes a focus that is generally sustained. Events and/or details are developed in a discernible order, although coherence may falter occasionally. Transitions, either explicit or implicit, tend to be mechanical and are generally used to connect events and/or details within sentences and/or between paragraphs. Closure is related to the focus and is mechanical and/or artificial. The introduction lacks purpose and/or is not functional; any focus established provides little direction and/or is not sustained. The development of events and/or details is not clearly discernible, and coherence falters frequently. Transitions, either explicit or implicit, are lacking and/or indiscriminately used to connect events and/or details within sentences and/or between paragraphs. Closure is abrupt, contrived, and/or unrelated to the focus. The introduction, if present, is obscure and/or ineffective; any focus established provides no direction and/or is undeveloped. The development of events and/or details is haphazard and/or incoherent. Transitions, either explicit or implicit, are absent and/or inappropriately used to connect events and/or details within sentences and/or between paragraphs. Closure is ineffectual or missing. The response has been awarded an INS for Content.
Proficient
Pf S
Satisfactory
Limited
L P
Poor
INS
Note: Content and Organization are weighted to be worth twice as much as the other scoring categories.
Insufficient
E S
Proficient
Pf L P
Satisfactory
Limited
Poor
INS
Insufficient
E S
Proficient
Pf
Satisfactory
Limited
L P
Poor
INS
10
Insufficient
E S
Proficient
Pf L P
Satisfactory
Limited
Poor
INS
Insufficient
11
Instructions
You may use the following print references: a dictionary (English and/or bilingual) a thesaurus Complete both assignments. Jot down your ideas and/or make aplanbefore you write. Do this on the Planningpages. Write in pencil, or blue or black ink, on thelined pages provided. You are to do only one handwritten copyof your writing.
2010
12
Write either a narrative or an essay about the importance of being kind to others. You may write about yourself or other people, real or fictional. You may set your writing in the past, present, or future.
Ideas The following material may give you ideas for your writing. You do not have to refer directly to any of it. Consider the knowledge and experience you have gained from reading, listening, viewing, discussing, thinking, or imagining.
Dickinson, Emily. The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson. Edited by Thomas H. Johnson. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1960. Guest, Edgar A. Creed. In Collected Verse of Edgar A. Guest. 7th ed. Chicago: The Reilly & Lee Co., 1943.
13
When writing, be sure to consider your audience focus on your purpose and point of view organize your thoughts appropriately in sentences and paragraphs use vocabulary that is interesting and effective edit your work directly on your writing budget your time
Aesop. The Lion and the Mouse. Aesops Fables Lessons in Living. Translated by Samuel Croxall and Sir Roger LEstrange. With applications and morals by G. F. Townsend and L. Valentine. Fort Worth: Brownlow Publishing Company, Inc., 1969. Pope. Alexander. Universal Prayer. In The Complete Poetical Works of Alexander Pope. Cambridge Edition. Edited by Henry W. Boynton. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1903. Sophocles. Ajax. Edited and translated by A. F. Garvie. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1998.
14
15
16
20
21
22
23
S
S
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
S
S S
S
S
31
Pf
32
33
34
35
36
37
Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
38
Pf
Pf Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
39
Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
40
41
42
43
44
Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
45
Pf
Pf
Pf Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
47
48
49
50
51
E
E
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
E
E
64
E
E
65
E
E
66
68
69
70
S S
71
72
73
74
75
76
Pf
Pf
77
Pf
Pf
Pf
Pf
79