Scribd
Upload
76 views

Class Evaluation Form

This evaluation form contains criteria for rating oral presentations on a scale of 1 to 5. It evaluates various aspects of the presentation such as the speaker's voice, enthusiasm, eye contact, preparation, body positioning, and avoidance of distractions. It also evaluates the content, including the introduction, clarity, summary, organization, transitions between sections, appropriateness for the audience, and length of the presentation. Space is provided for comments on what aspects worked well and could be improved.

Uploaded by

Mazhar Iqbal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
76 views

Class Evaluation Form

This evaluation form contains criteria for rating oral presentations on a scale of 1 to 5. It evaluates various aspects of the presentation such as the speaker's voice, enthusiasm, eye contact, preparation, body positioning, and avoidance of distractions. It also evaluates the content, including the introduction, clarity, summary, organization, transitions between sections, appropriateness for the audience, and length of the presentation. Space is provided for comments on what aspects worked well and could be improved.

Uploaded by

Mazhar Iqbal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

EVALUATION FORM FOR ORAL PRESENTATIONS Speakers name: Topic Indicate the appropriate score from 1 = poor, no,

or negative to 5 = excellent, yes or positive


Presentation 1. Voice (volume, modulation and enunciation) . Ent$usiasm and ener%y !. Eye contact &it$ audience ". 'reparation ( re$earsal (notes, cues) # 'ace o) presentation *. +ody positionin% ,. -voidance o) distractin% be$avior .. /se o) visual aids Content 1. 0ntroduction o) sub1ect . 2larity, correctness and conciseness !. Summary and conclusions ". 3verall or%ani4ation o) presentation #. Transition bet&een sections *. -ppropriateness )or speci)ic audience (as de)ined) ,. 5en%t$ o) talk (timin% ) .. 6andlin% o) 7uestions Comments 8$at &orked &ell: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Evaluated by:

Date:

8$at improvements could be made:

You might also like