Scribd
Upload
26 views4 pages

Hasil P Data Dini BARU

This document contains statistics and frequency tables summarizing data on employee motivation, work rotation systems, and recognition systems from a sample of 32 employees. It finds that most employees reported low motivation (59.4%) and an unsatisfactory rotation system (62.5%). It also finds a significant relationship between motivation and both the rotation system and recognition system.

Uploaded by

Komp Aan
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
26 views4 pages

Hasil P Data Dini BARU

This document contains statistics and frequency tables summarizing data on employee motivation, work rotation systems, and recognition systems from a sample of 32 employees. It finds that most employees reported low motivation (59.4%) and an unsatisfactory rotation system (62.5%). It also finds a significant relationship between motivation and both the rotation system and recognition system.

Uploaded by

Komp Aan
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Lampiran Hasil Pengolahan Data Frequencies

Statistics Motivasi N Valid Missing Mean Median Mode Std. Deviation Variance Range Maximum Sum 32 0 1.4062 1.0000 1.00 .49899 .249 1.00 2.00 45.00 Sistem Rotasi 32 0 1.3750 1.0000 1.00 .49187 .242 1.00 2.00 44.00 Pengakuan 32 0 1.5938 2.0000 2.00 .49899 .249 1.00 2.00 51.00

Frequency Table
Motivasi Cumulative Frequency Valid Rendah Tinggi Total 19 13 32 Percent 59.4 40.6 100.0 Valid Percent 59.4 40.6 100.0 Percent 59.4 100.0

Sistem Rotasi Cumulative Frequency Valid Kurang Baik Baik Total 20 12 32 Percent 62.5 37.5 100.0 Valid Percent 62.5 37.5 100.0 Percent 62.5 100.0

Pengakuan Cumulative Frequency Valid Kurang Baik Baik Total 13 19 32 Percent 40.6 59.4 100.0 Valid Percent 40.6 59.4 100.0 Percent 40.6 100.0

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Sistem Rotasi * Motivasi Kerja Pengakuan * Motivasi Kerja 32 32 Percent 100.0% 100.0% N 0 0 Missing Percent .0% .0% N 32 32 Total Percent 100.0% 100.0%

Sistem Rotasi * Motivasi Kerja


Crosstab Motivasi Rendah Sistem Rotasi Kurang Baik Count % within Sistem Rotasi Baik Count % within Sistem Rotasi Total Count % within Sistem Rotasi 16 80.0% 3 25.0% 19 59.4% Tinggi 4 20.0% 9 75.0% 13 40.6% Total 20 100.0% 12 100.0% 32 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
b b

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

df
a

sided) 1 1 1 .002 .007 .002

9.406

7.264 9.718

.004 9.112 32 1 .003

.003

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.88. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Pengakuan * Motivasi Kerja


Crosstab Motivasi Rendah Pengakuan Kurang Baik Count % within Pengakuan Baik Count % within Pengakuan Total Count % within Pengakuan 11 84.6% 8 42.1% 19 59.4% Tinggi 2 15.4% 11 57.9% 13 40.6% Total 13 100.0% 19 100.0% 32 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
b b

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

df
a

sided) 1 1 1 .016 .042 .013

5.783

4.155 6.203

.028 5.602 32 1 .018

.019

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.28.

Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
b b

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

df
a

sided) 1 1 1 .016 .042 .013

5.783

4.155 6.203

.028 5.602 32 1 .018

.019

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.28. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

You might also like