HW1 Soln
HW1 Soln
. Then notice from the domain of the joint density that trivially FX (x) = 0 for x < 2, FX (x) = 1 for x 4 and FY (y ) = 0 for y < 1, FY (y ) = 1 for y 2. It is only necessary to calculate: x 3 .5 x 1dydt = (x 2)(3 .5x)/2. For 2 x < 4, FX (x) = 2 1 y 6 2s 1dxds = (y 1)(3 y ). For 1 y < 2, FY (y ) = 1 2 (ii) Dierentiate the marginal CDF, fX (x) = FX (x) = 2 .5x for 2 x < 4 and fY (y ) = FY (y ) = 4 2y for 1 y < 2. When we look at the product fX (x)fY (y ), we see that this product depends on the specic (x, y ) values hence not equal to the joint pdf fX,Y . So one can conclude that X and Y are not independent. 2. (i) E (X ) = 0 .23+2 .1+(1) .5+3 .17 = .21, E (Y ) = 1 .23+5 .1+ (1).5+7.17 = 1.42, E (XY ) = 0.23+25.1+(1)(1).5+37.17 = 5.07. (ii) First calculate Var(X ) = E (X 2 ) .212 = 0 .23 + 4 .1 + 1 .5 + 9 .17 .212 = 2.3859, Var(Y ) = E (Y 2 ) 1.422 = 1 .23 + 25 .1 + 1 .5 + 49 .17 1.422 = 9.5436. Then calculate Cov(X, Y ) = E ( XY ) E (X )E (Y ) = 5.07 .21 1.42 = 4.7718 and Corr(X, Y ) = 4.7718/ 2.3859 9.5436 = 1. It means Y is a linear function of X and vice versa. 3. (i) Calculate E (X ) = 0 ( + 1)x=1 dx = ( + 1)/( + 2). Let ( + 1)/( + = (2X and solve for . The MM estimator is 1)/(1 X ) = 3. 2) = X n (ii) The log likelihood function is l(x; ) = ln[( +1) ( Xi ) ]. Let l (x; ) = 0 = (n + ln( Xi ))/ ln( Xi ) = 3.116. and solve for . The MLE is 4. (i) Find that t.025,14 = 2.145. The 95% condence interval for the mean failure strain by a small sample procedure is: 25 2.145 3.5/ 15 = (23.06, 26.94). (ii) The 95% condence interval is:25 2.145 3.5 1 + 1/15 = (17.24, 32.75. It is bigger than the CI given in part (i) because here we are predicting the behavior of a new R.V. instead of estimating the constant population mean. 5. This is a large sample z -test. The test statistic is z = (4.875)/(.35/ 100) = 3.71. The P-value for testing the alternative hypothesis = 5 is 2 P [z <
1
3.71] = 0. We must reject the null hypothesis when using = 0.01 given this very small P-value.