Scribd
Upload
210 views

Lingaps

This document discusses contact analysis in Nastran SOL101 using linear-gap elements. It provides an overview of linear-gap elements, how gap constraints are solved in SOL101 through an iterative technique, and the advantages and limitations of the linear-gap approach. An example model of two bolts analyzed with different contact modeling methods including linear-gap in SOL101 is presented to demonstrate its use.

Uploaded by

Gowtham Reddy
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
210 views

Lingaps

This document discusses contact analysis in Nastran SOL101 using linear-gap elements. It provides an overview of linear-gap elements, how gap constraints are solved in SOL101 through an iterative technique, and the advantages and limitations of the linear-gap approach. An example model of two bolts analyzed with different contact modeling methods including linear-gap in SOL101 is presented to demonstrate its use.

Uploaded by

Gowtham Reddy
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Contact analysis in Nastran SOL101

by

Rajasekaran Natarajan Consultant Kawasaki, Japan

Rajasekaran Natarajan

objectives

Gap Elements in SOL106 and SOL126

Overview, Comparison methodology and tools

Rajasekaran Natarajan

contact analysis by linear-gap

Gap constraints in SOL101 from version 70.5

contact analysis by linear-gap

Using linear-gap elements

overview of lin-gap

Do not require gap stiffness No friction considered Only opening or closing of gaps Constrain for single d.o.f Solution by iteration

Rajasekaran Natarajan

overview of lin-gap

Gap constraints in SOL101

The displacement cannot be negative to Avoid Penetration the the chosen d.o.f must be perpendicular to contact surface Chosen d.o.f must be positive in the opening direction Chosen d.o.f must be positive in the opening direction

Rajasekaran Natarajan

contact analysis by linear-gap

characteristics

contact analysis by linear-gap

Gap constraints in SOL101 from version 70.5

solving lin-gap constraints

Gap constraints in SOL101

Constraints are solved by the iterative technique The iteration starts with the random vector of initial state closed/open Solution obtained when No Penetration/ Tension Forces

Rajasekaran Natarajan

Why lin-gap not nlgap

Gap constraints in SOL101

Alternative method to solution using Gap in SOL 106 No Need for Gap Stiffness calculations No know-how needed to control nonlinear parameter as in SOL 106 SOl106 may not converge on some cases and some Initial gap values

Rajasekaran Natarajan

contact analysis by linear-gap

Advantages

contact analysis by linear-gap

solution

Why lin-gap not temprod

Gap constraints in SOL101

No need of manual control and input file parsing on every iteration Achieved full convergence The time/effort required is negligible Fast turnaround time

Rajasekaran Natarajan

constraints

Gap constraints in SOL101

Only constraint displacement non-linearity No Gap stiffness and no sliding friction Free-Bodies cannot be analyzed No constraints changes allowed between sub cases Solution may not converge

Rajasekaran Natarajan

contact analysis by linear-gap

Limitations

contact analysis by linear-gap

Advantages

basics

methodology

Penetrating Node 13 Opening Node 12 Initial gap opening Displacement of penetrating Node U13 Displacement of opening Node U12 Actual gap displacement
Rajasekaran Natarajan

Np No Gi Up Uo Ug 9

methodology

MPC Modeling

Actual Gap (Ug) = difference in displacement of (U13) and (U12)+ initial gap(Gi) Ug = U12 U13 +Gi or Ug U12 + U13 Gi = 0

Rajasekaran Natarajan

10

contact analysis by linear-gap

contact analysis by linear-gap

methodology

MPC Modeling

Ug U12 + U13 Gi = 0 Since Ug cannot be dependent and U13 is constrained already U12 + Ug Gi = 0 Assign SPOINT 51 for Ug and SPOINT 101 for Gi Assign SUPORT for Ug Apply initial gap displacement to Gi Create MPC using the Relation

Rajasekaran Natarajan

11

methodology

Case and bulk cards Max. No. of Iteration PARAM,CDITER, <integer> Print Iteration History PARAM,CDPRT, <yes/no> Punch Final Contact Status PARAM,CDSHUT, <yes/no> Input Vector of Initial status DMIG,CDSHUT Default All closed
Rajasekaran Natarajan

12

contact analysis by linear-gap

contact analysis by linear-gap

Example1

2 Bolts As CBAR12 6 points u,v,w=0 x,y,z =0


Rajasekaran Natarajan

13

Example1

Model Without Contact

Model With Contact

Methods used for contact TempRod CBAR Cgap SOL106 Lingap SOL101

Rajasekaran Natarajan

14

contact analysis by linear-gap

Analyzed Models

contact analysis by linear-gap

Proj: Example Model-Basic

Input for lingap

Rajasekaran Natarajan

15

Input for lingap

Rajasekaran Natarajan

16

contact analysis by linear-gap

Bulk Cards

contact analysis by linear-gap

Bulk Cards

Input for lingap

Rajasekaran Natarajan

17

Input for lingap

Rajasekaran Natarajan

18

contact analysis by linear-gap

Bulk Cards

contact analysis by linear-gap

Bulk Cards

Results and Discussion

Rajasekaran Natarajan

19

References

References

MSC/NASTRAN manuals from 70.5 Local Analysis of Fastener Holes using the linear Gap Technology of MSC/NASTRAN John McCullough and Lance Proctor Somewhere from the web

Rajasekaran Natarajan

20

contact analysis by linear-gap

contact analysis by linear-gap

Bolt Forces

10

You might also like