QFD Contiene Link A Software
QFD Contiene Link A Software
Lecture 6. Page 1 of 27
Lecture 6. Page 2 of 27
Where we are
We have seen how to define the problem We have seen how to decompose it We have seen how to be creative We have seen how to evaluate solutions Now how can we improve on existing products? - What does the CUSTOMER want?
Lecture 6. Page 3 of 27
QFD:Definition
QFD stands for Quality Function Deployment. Derived from six Chinese/ Japanese characters: 1. Hin shitsu: Qualities, features or attributes 2. Ki no: function 3. Ten kai: deployment QFD:- systematic way for developing products based on the needs of the customer.
[email protected] Lecture 6. Page 4 of 27
History of QFD
Originally developed by Yoji Akao of Tokyo in 1966. First implemented at the Kobe Shipyard of Mitsubishi in 1972. Subsequently adopted by Toyota and other Japanese Firms. First QFD Training outside Japan at GM and Ford in 1972. Later by other companies around the world
Lecture 6. Page 5 of 27
GOAL:
Recognize the correlations between the customer requirements and the product characteristics Identify the product characteristics that affect specific customer requirements Recognize the correlations within the engineering characteristics
[email protected] Lecture 6. Page 6 of 27
QFD : QUALITY FUNCTION DEVELOPMENT Paper by Hauser and Clausing in Harvard Business Review 1988 prompted the introduction of the Japanese House of Quality into US companies. Quality:
Basic (unspoken, assumed) expected, typical Performance (spoken) one dimensional, market research results Excitement (unspoken, the customer does not know s/he wants it) pleasant, surprises or delights customer
Lecture 6. Page 7 of 27
QFD
# design changes US Japan HOUSE OF QUALITY
Before
After
How/ How
How what
Howmuch
Lecture 6. Page 8 of 27
Lecture 6. Page 9 of 27
QFD
House of Quality
++ ++ Goal-Conflicts 9 Engineering
... EC 1 EC 2
Ex.: 1-10
Ex.: 1-10
Characteristics 3
Competition compar. In
Customer
Weights 2
CorrelationMatrix 4
Assessment 5
Targets6
techn. Competition compar. 7
Lecture 6. Page 10 of 27
customer's view 8
CA 1 CA 2 ...
W1 W2 ...
Attributes 1
EXAMPLE
Caution: oversimplified! And only top level considered! Check publications
E. Characteristics
Engraving ability
Design / Color
Body material
Lead material
Competitor 1
Competitor 2
Our product 5 4 7 3 3 5
Erasor
Easy to erase Writes forever Feels good in hand Will not leak Not easy to lose Cost .....
5 10 5 4 1 5
1 3
9 9 9 9
.....
Customer Attributes
3 1 3 1 1
7 4 6 3 3 7
5 4 4 4 3 6
70 Priority
2
186
1
61
4
62
3
1
5
Goal 7 6 7 6 8 8
QFD Analysis
Potential for Use of a House of Quality Matrix Technique in Rehabilitation Engineering
by: Logan, G.D. & Radcliffe, D.F. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering
[email protected] Lecture 6. Page 12 of 27
Acquired customer requirements through interaction with patients, and videotaped sessions. Case 1: improving controls on wheelchair Case 2: attaching oxygen tank to wheelchair
Lecture 6. Page 13 of 27
Case 1 H.O.Q.
Lecture 6. Page 14 of 27
Paper Conclusions
Case 1 results:
H.O.Q. provided accurate results. Top 3 ranked items lead to a successful product and had considerably higher totals than the remaining engineering features.
Lecture 6. Page 15 of 27
QFD INTENTIONS
Cross Functional Teams Development of a new product , service, or process Refining an existing product , service, or process Team fills out a House of Quality Define the Voice Of the Customer rows on the left Define the Performance Measures columns on the top
Engineering Characteristics
Lecture 6. Page 16 of 27
Parts Specifications
Parts Specifications
Using QFD to deploy the VOC throughout the development process One is not enough
Manufacturing Processes
Lecture 6. Page 17 of 27
UNREALISTIC
Performance Measures Customer Needs
40 - 60 columns 15 - 20 rows
Parts Specifications
Eager to get to design Substitute a design matrix for second house 80 - 90% of learning occurs in the initial HOQ
[email protected]
Lecture 6. Page 18 of 27
QFD software
QFD Capture (free evaluation download) http://www.gsm.mq.edu.au/cmit/ German, Excel,
Lecture 6. Page 19 of 27
Lecture 6. Page 20 of 27
Lecture 6. Page 21 of 27
Lecture 6. Page 22 of 27
Lecture 6. Page 23 of 27
Lecture 6. Page 24 of 27
Conclusions
Powerful tool to help you prioritize what to work on. Powerful tool to allow you to compare your product to the competitions products and target how to better satisfy the customer Weakness is lack of scientific basis. More heuristic method proven to help companies
[email protected] Lecture 6. Page 26 of 27
Presentations
Provide pertinent facts to busy people Be systematic: Carefully prepare
Analyze the audience State your objective Define your main message and support it
Introduction Body Conclusion
Watch presentation skills, do not distract Support your material with facts, references- Make sure they are correct Use professional language, no slang, no excessive acronyms Proper grammar, articulation, loudness Variety in pitch, rate, intensity Eye contact Watch for hesitations, filler words Stay on time Use appropriate number of visual aids, and make them good quality Use clear fonts (Arial), large size fonts (readable from back of room) Do not use distracting color Put the name of each presenter at the bottom of the slide REHEARSE!!!!!! You should not have to look back at the screen
Lecture 6. Page 27 of 27