Project Management and Organisational Strategy
Project Management and Organisational Strategy
5.
Table of Contents
Project Management and the Organisational Strategy An Overview of the Strategic Management Process The Need for a Project Selection and Priority System Questions to be answered The Selection Process Proposals Screening The Priority Team Selection Criteria Assessing Results Summary 2 3 5 5 7 7 8 8 10 11
5.
Company
Ford Motor Company
Business Goal
Regain market share recently lost to General Motors Regain quality reputation that was damaged because of Pinto gas tank explosions Increase productivity
Business Strategy
Resize and downsize present models Emphasise use of programmed combustion engines instead of diesel engines
Burger King
Increase people efciency Increase machine efciency Modernise Develop valuable real estate holdings Complete an appropriate railroad merger
CP Railroad
Table 1: Examples of Business Goals and Related Strategies The development of strategies to meet these needs and goals answers the question of What we need to do to achieve these goals. It requires an extensive analysis of the internal and external environments. Based on a political, economic, social, and technological analysis (PEST), we analyse the external environment to identify opportunities, and threats. We analyse the internal environment looking for strengths and weaknesses such as management, facilities, core competencies, product quality, technology, and nancial resources. The deliverable of this analysis is a set of strategies designed to best meet the needs of the customers.
5.
Implementation of these strategies requires actions, and completing tasks. It answers the question of How are we going to realise these strategies. Implementation must include attention to the following key points: Executing the work requires allocation of resources such as funds, people, and equipment. Organisational resources are limited. In addition, multiple goals frequently impose conicting demands on resources. This requires a mechanism for allocating resources based on organisational priorities. Implementation requires an organisational structure that supports projects. Project management processes for planning, executing, and controlling are essential to ensure that we are able to implement strategies effectively and efciently. We need a project selection and priority system to ensure strong linkages between projects and the strategic plan.
Figure 1: Strategic Management & Project Management Figure 1 shows the strategic management process and its relationship to projects.
5.
Questions to be answered
Some of the questions that we need to tackle when we are considering a project selection and priority system are as follows: How can we minimise the power of politics? How can we consistently prioritise projects to support the organisational strategy? How can we use the prioritised list of projects to allocate organisational scarce resources? How can the process encourage bottom-up initiation of projects that support organisational goals and strategies?
5.
A fact is that we are always going to have more potential projects or proposals than the capacity of the organisational resources. Thus, we need a systematic process that will select projects and allocate resources to these projects in order to maximise value added. Selection of projects from a slate of projects requires the use of a decision model in association with specic criteria. The benets of carefully selected criteria are as follows: More effective planning of organisational resources More efcient utilisation of organisational resources A portfolio of projects that balance opportunities, and threats given available resources Keeping the organisation stakeholders focused on the most critical projects Obtaining consensus as to which projects have the highest priority
Nevertheless, when we have implemented a project selection and priority system in our organisation we met enormous skepticism and resistance. Typical responses include the followings: We all know which projects are the most important ones All projects are important Our business is changing on daily basis. We do not need an extra layer of bureaucracy, which limits our exibility.
Responses such as the above suggest a serious need for a project selection and priority system. Nevertheless, the development and the implementation of such a system will not materialise without the support and sponsorship of upper management. Practitioners can choose from a relatively large number of project priority and selection models. Picking a selection model is highly dependent on certain organisational attributes such as industry, risk aversion level, technology, competition, management style, and markets. Selection models should encompass multiple criteria such as protability, researching new technology, public image, core competencies, and strategic t.
5.
Proposals Screening
Proposals for projects come from internal and external sources. In most situations, organisations have more proposals on hand, than they can pursue. These proposals have to go through a screening process. Figure 2 shows a screening process used by one of my clients. The prerequisites for implementing an effective screening process are: Publishing of the selection criteria so that self-evaluations are carried out by sponsors before they are submitted to the priority team Publishing guidelines and templates for developing a business case which will facilitate the evaluation process by the priority team
Terminate Reject
Idea
Selfevaluation
Pursue
Accept
Accept
Selection Criteria
We need to base the project selection criteria on the organisational critical success factors and strategic goals. Failure to select the right factors will render the priority and selection process useless. Example of typical selection criteria used by one of my customers: Alignment with core competencies Alignment with strategic goals Internal rate of return in excess of (a certain number say 15%) Improve customer service Urgency
5.
Management weights each criterion by its relative contribution and importance to the organisations goals, and strategic plan. The project priority team evaluates each project proposal by its relative contribution or benet to the selection criteria. The priority team assigns a spectrum of values for each criterion ranging from low (0), to high (10). This value represents the proposals t to the specic criterion. Table 2 shows a project selection matrix. For example, Proposal 1 appears to t well with the strategic goals of the organisation since the priority team gave it a score of seven. However, Proposal 1 does little to support core competencies since the priority team gave it a score of two. The last step in this model is to apply management weights to each criterion by importance using a spectrum of values ranging from low (1), to high (3). For example, improve customer service has a weight of three while urgency has a weight 2. Note that urgency is different than must category discussed above. Although proposal 4 appears to have some urgency, yet we did not classify it as a must project. That is why we are analysing it with other proposals. In rare cases such as two projects have the same score; the priority team may pick the project that has less demand on organisational resources.
Selection Criteria
Alignment Internal rate Improve with strategic of return in customer goals excess of service 15%
3.0 7 4 6 0 8 1.5 3 1 3 9 4 3.0 5 5 3 7 9
5.
Assessing Results
The project priority system selects which projects we need to pursue based on their support to the organisational strategy. In addition, we need a model that assesses the long-term effectiveness of the project priority system. The assessment model focuses on the performance in ve main areas: Customer Internal Innovation Knowledge transfer Financial measures We need to collect metrics in order to analyse and assess the effectiveness of the project priority system. The following list shows some typical metrics that we use to assess these ve main areas: Customer - Sales compared to industry norms - Percentage of on-time /within budget/according to specications projects Internal - Time to market a new product or service - Reduction in design time Innovation - Sales generated from new products Knowledge transfer - Savings generated from improvements in project management processes Financial measures - Return on investment - Internal rate of return - Cash ow analysis
We need to measure these metrics over a period and compare them with industry norms if they are available in order to have a fair view of the company performance.
5.
10
Summary
A project management approach to business problems and opportunities is becoming the norm rather than the exception. Projects are the tools for implementing the strategy of the organisation. Effective project management starts with selecting and prioritising projects that support the organisational vision, mission and strategy. The priority system focuses attention on the vision, mission and major goals of the organisation. It fosters consensus to which projects are of highest priority. It results in a portfolio of projects that balance threats and opportunities. It provides a better utilisation of resources. We need to evaluate all project proposals using the same selection criteria. We need to enforce the project priority system. Furthermore, maintaining its openness and aboveboard are crucial in order to sustain its integrity. The priority team needs to communicate which projects are approved project priorities or ranks, status of in-progress projects, and changes in project selection criteria. Such a system will enable the organisation to integrate its goals and strategy with a portfolio of projects selected through a proactive process.
11
5.
www.esi-emea.com