Aligning incentives with your preferred outcomes The Australian Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, was quoted this morning as being open to a review of the R&D tax credit scheme Australia uses to reward companies for undertaking 'risky', early stage product research and development. The aim of the scheme is to make these efforts less financial uncertain, and encourage Australian innovation and invention*. The article cited examples of companies from the gaming industry - think slot machines ('pokies') - claiming a tax break for coming up with new ways for people to gamble. Gambling is simply one example of how the current R&D tax credit scheme provides incentives for activities that we might otherwise, as a nation and a society, choose not to encourage. R&D tax credits can be paid out to any organisation working on product research, regardless of the product. Australia recently agreed to a 2030 deadline for a transition to a circular economy, with work going on at Federal and state levels currently exploring exactly what that might mean. Whenever I've had the chance, I've highlighted the importance of using government levers like the R&D tax credit scheme to encourage the development of the types of products we want to see - long-lasting, repairable, modular, able to be disassembled, recyclable, and free of toxic materials - and to stop rewarding companies developing products that meet none of these criteria. A similar argument can be made about the new Future Made in Australia fund - aimed at encouraging domestic manufacturing capability. The fund currently has little or no controls in place to stop government grants going towards companies producing undesirable products. We'll potentially be directly funding the creation of products we are otherwise trying to phase out. This is a good example of where a systems lens can provide a really useful perspective on the design of a policy framework, including recognising when it is no longer fit for purpose. #strategicdesign #systemsdesign #policy * Arguably, the period when Australia was at its most inventive and productive was when the corporate tax rate was much, much higher than it is today, encouraging businesses to reinvest surplus income. That's potentially a post for another day.
Systems lens is the right approach for this. No simple solution to how incentives can work but the gambling one is a great example of an unintended consequence.
MiA advocates for tax incentives for repair of products for small busineses and attendees to repair cafes I.e. the purchase of spare parts Troy Stolz Dip App AML CTF gaming mentioned fyi
Product Sustainability, Stewardship, Good Design, Communications
4moSpot on Steve! While many other countries embrace tax reform to deliver superior environmental and social outcomes, Australia puddles along. As Richard Denniss from the The Australia Institute rightly states ... “tax things we want less of and subsidise things we want more of”.