Seema Shah Ahuja’s Post

'BioRationality—How to Promote Science to Secure Waiver of Comparative Efficacy Testing for #Biosimilars' "A recent Biosimilars Council Position Paper presented arguments that “#Comparative #Efficacy #Studies Are Usually Unnecessary” if analytical, functional, and pharmacokinetic methodologies are sufficient to detect clinically meaningful differences. The paper also suggested that the #FDA require clinical efficacy testing “only when scientifically justified and unique risk-based considerations are identified considering, for example, the mechanism of action, the complexity of the product, or the delivery mechanism.” "The #USFDA has admitted that our current clinical trial system is broken. "The #UKMHRA United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has already concluded and stated that: “Although each biosimilar development needs to be evaluated on a case by case basis, it is considered that, in most cases, a comparative efficacy trial may not be necessary if sound scientific rationale supports this approach.” "The #EMA European Medicines Agency has called for a position paper to adopt a similar policy, calling for comments by April 30. A reflection paper is anticipated soon." Read more on these interesting developments in this article. https://lnkd.in/gXeehuCA Biocon Biologics Sandeep Athalye

BioRationality—How to Promote Science to Secure Waiver of Comparative Efficacy Testing for Biosimilars

BioRationality—How to Promote Science to Secure Waiver of Comparative Efficacy Testing for Biosimilars

centerforbiosimilars.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics