Research in Finance’s Post

Research in Finance reposted this

View profile for Chris Chancellor

Leadership and Expertise

Active ETFs are hot right now. In the US they have grown from less than €200bn in 2020 to over a trillion dollars today. European asset management has been slower to shift as the inherent tax benefits in the US for the ETF structure were not present in Europe. But, they aren’t a complete unknown, active ETF assets stand at around €50bn in Europe, less than 3% of industry assets.  However, the times they are a changing. 2025 is set to become the year of active ETFs. Daily more groups are announcing plans to launch or investigate launching active ETFs and our research suggests they are right to consider this approach, 42% of fund selectors expect ETFs to be preferred to mutual funds in 5 years, with a further 42% expecting complementary roles. 7% expect ETFs to completely replace mutual funds – much higher in some countries. That’s almost 1 in 10 investors across Europe seeing no future for mutual funds. There’s a big variety in how they are defined by investors, who wants them, what they want, tracking error targets and where fund selectors are going to get ETF information. Let me know if you want to catch up on the topic, it seems to come up in every meeting in the past month. I’ll leave the last word to this private banker in our latest study who sees an opportunity but also defines active ETFs in what may be a challenging way for many managers launching today – there’s a big job to do in defining active ETFs: “An interesting development that we see is the trend in active ETFs. And what I mean by that is that these products, these active ETFs are very, very similar to the additional passive ETFs, but generally have some diversification related to the benchmarking, that they overweight or underweight certain sectors or securities, but with a very limited tracking error.”

  • No alternative text description for this image
William Poulin

Investment Product | Strategy | Management

1mo

This topic “active ETFs are hot right now”, is fundamentally incorrect. “Active” is a box that must be checked on an SEC filing, and if you’re NOT an index Tracker, you’re “active”. But fewer that 5% of filings and rollouts in 2024 were truly “active” (applying fundamental security analysis and selection). Most every new ETF in 2024 was a buffer, principal protected, option income or single stock leveraged/inverse ETF— with few exceptions, they’re indexed. (Rote rolling of futures, swaps and options is considered “active”.) Maybe ✅ “active” in the SEC filing, but not anything that meets common definition of active strategy. Most will close. Truly “active” ETF filings are not so hot, but those ~50 or so ETFs are probably more coherent.

Like
Reply
Nabeel Ansari

Director - Asset Management Advisory

1mo

Without the tax incentives in the US, what do you see as driving the attention Chris? Is it just the new shiny thing or is there genuine cost / alpha advantages?

Like
Reply
Michael O'Riordan

Connecting the ETF ecosystem / Educating the market / Bringing ETFs to more people.

1mo

Chris Chancellor the only reason asset allocators or private banks are flirting with ETFs is because it gives them a story to tell their clients. There are only so many stories you can spin about a passive portfolio before people start dozing off. Active ETFs are what Smart Beta was a number of years ago - the next big thing. Some things just never change.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics