Penelope Caldwell’s Post

Interesting read

Interesting Read

I really like this practical advice.

Independent doctors face a myriad of challenges in 2024, shaping the landscape of their practice. Here are the top ten hurdles they encounter: 1) Physician Shortage: The ongoing shortage of physicians puts strain on independent practices, leading to increased workload and burnout. 2)Evolving Healthcare Policies: Constant changes in healthcare policies and regulations create uncertainty and administrative burden for independent doctors . 3) Financial Pressures: Independent doctors struggle with financial pressures, including declining reimbursement rates and rising operational costs. 4) Technological Integration: Adapting to rapidly evolving healthcare technologies and electronic medical records systems poses challenges for independent practices. 5) Patient Engagement: Engaging patients effectively amidst competing demands for their attention becomes increasingly challenging for independent doctors. 6) Mental Health Crisis: Independent doctors are not immune to the mental health crisis affecting the healthcare workforce, leading to burnout and reduced quality of care. 7) Regulatory Compliance: Meeting stringent regulatory requirements while maintaining operational efficiency presents a significant challenge for independent practices. 8) Work-Life Balance: Balancing professional commitments with personal well-being remains a constant struggle for independent doctors, impacting their overall satisfaction and performance. 9) Interoperability Challenges: Ensuring seamless interoperability between different healthcare systems and platforms poses technical and logistical challenges for independent practices. 10)Competing with Large Healthcare Systems: Independent doctors face stiff competition from large healthcare systems, which often have greater resources and negotiating power. Navigating these challenges requires resilience, adaptability, and strategic planning to ensure the continued success and sustainability of independent medical practices. Comment below and tell us what your top concerns are. #qualityhealthcare #physicianburnout #privatepractices

ICYMI - We recently featured a series of videos from our founder and CEO Jen Goldsack, discussing the current challenges and opportunities in the digital health software market. Click the link below to watch the series in full. https://bit.ly/3Z616Og As Jen notes, the digital health market is transforming patient care, yet buyers and end users—health systems, payers, and patients—struggle to navigate a crowded landscape filled with inconsistent quality and trust issues. Developers building exceptional solutions face a similar challenge: standing out and earning the recognition they deserve. We are proud of our efforts to address these critical issues with the launch of the DiMe Seal. After extensive research, including the review of 1,000+ scientific articles, 47 regulatory guidances, and 100+ industry standards, we’ve built an evidence-based framework to establish a universal benchmark for digital health software quality. The DiMe Seal framework supports developers in proving their product’s trustworthiness while helping end users make better, faster decisions. 🎯 Get involved! Are you a developer of a digital health software product? Head to https://bit.ly/4e39jbx to start your evaluation today! And for the health systems, providers, payors, and patients looking for software products built for quality and trust, visit our website to learn more about the benefits of selecting DiMe Seal-awarded products, and sign the open letter of support from the adopter community. The future of healthcare depends on trust in digital health. Let’s build it together.

Independent doctors face a myriad of challenges in 2024, shaping the landscape of their practice. Here are the top ten hurdles they encounter: 1) Physician Shortage: The ongoing shortage of physicians puts strain on independent practices, leading to increased workload and burnout. 2)Evolving Healthcare Policies: Constant changes in healthcare policies and regulations create uncertainty and administrative burden for independent doctors . 3) Financial Pressures: Independent doctors struggle with financial pressures, including declining reimbursement rates and rising operational costs. 4) Technological Integration: Adapting to rapidly evolving healthcare technologies and electronic medical records systems poses challenges for independent practices. 5) Patient Engagement: Engaging patients effectively amidst competing demands for their attention becomes increasingly challenging for independent doctors. 6) Mental Health Crisis: Independent doctors are not immune to the mental health crisis affecting the healthcare workforce, leading to burnout and reduced quality of care. 7) Regulatory Compliance: Meeting stringent regulatory requirements while maintaining operational efficiency presents a significant challenge for independent practices. 8) Work-Life Balance: Balancing professional commitments with personal well-being remains a constant struggle for independent doctors, impacting their overall satisfaction and performance. 9) Interoperability Challenges: Ensuring seamless interoperability between different healthcare systems and platforms poses technical and logistical challenges for independent practices. 10)Competing with Large Healthcare Systems: Independent doctors face s

Over the past decade, the term ”implementer” has been used frequently, especially in communities of practice where members can contribute to the mission or a technical solution. But what does it really mean to be an implementer in the OpenHIE community? Learn more on our blog! https://lnkd.in/d2vAxF4x

A few people messaged asking my perspective on the STAT article by Brittany Trang, which you can find here: https://lnkd.in/ga2B-TXM It's a really good, well-researched read in that it provides unique/net new conversational angles compared to earlier ones. My one critique is that the article alludes to ulterior motives and biases for some key players, but then fails to acknowledge the full history of those it accuses (i.e. working at an on-ramp subsequent to an EHR). As someone who worked at an EHR (Epic), launched two different on-ramps (Zus Health and what's now Redox Access), everyone has their history and biases. It's also interesting to consider what zero equity in Epic and significant equity in the latter companies mean for those perceived biases, as well. So the least we can do is tell the whole story if we think there's impartiality. Better yet, if uncertain, we can not make it part of the story at all and assume people are just acting in good faith, to the best of their abilities and intentions (cue optimism and rose colored glasses) In the same vein, if we have to focus on history and biases, the article could acknowledge the biases of one of the main people quotes (i.e. someone who has only worked at a niche on-ramp and life sciences).

Please read my blog