Pat Yongpradit’s Post

View profile for Pat Yongpradit

Chief Academic Officer at Code.org | Lead of TeachAI | Systems Changer | Hip Hop Head

You don't have to understand the type of math Terence Tao studies (I don't) to glean takeaways from his comments about using AI to explore the boundaries of math. Having strong subject matter expertise is crucial for getting the most out of AI tools. AI use cases are often complex and context-dependent, so identifying which ones are valuable also requires at minimum a basic understanding of how the tools work, including their capabilities and limitations. Determining which problems can best be addressed with AI, how to define them properly, and then integrating the tool into the workflow demands a high level of expertise - both topic and tool. Here's a great quote: "I think at the frontier, we will always need humans and AI. They have complementary strengths. AI is very good at converting billions of pieces of data into one good answer. Humans are good at taking 10 observations and making really inspired guesses." Lane Dilg, thanks for sharing the article :)

Josh Weiss

Director of Technology and Innovation, Stanford Accelerator for Learning

5mo

I was struck by his prediction about using AI as glue to achieve new insights. And not just human-to-idea glue, but also human-to-highly specialized math software-to-idea glue.

Dorothy Carlson

Technology and Innovation Coach at Poway Unified School District | ASU+GSV AI Innovator | Teacher | Learner

5mo

The line about humans and AI as “complementary strengths” stands out for me as well. It’s a strong framework for thinking and learning about AI Literacy.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics