❓How do we evaluate the cybersecurity knowledge of LLMs? Introducing CyberMetric-80, CyberMetric-500, CyberMetric-2000, and CyberMetric-10000—comprehensive Q&A benchmark datasets designed for this purpose. 📚 Using LLM and RAG, we created these datasets from NIST standards, research papers, and more, validated by experts over 200+ hours. We tested 25 top LLM models and involved 30 human participants in CyberMetric-80. 🔍 Results: GPT-4o, GPT-4-turbo, Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct, Falcon-180B-Chat, and GEMINI-pro 1.0 excelled, outperforming human participants, though experienced experts still surpassed smaller models like Llama-3-8B. 📖 Read the full paper here: https://lnkd.in/eaJvbmSK #Cybersecurity #AI #LLM #CyberMetric #Innovation
Impressive
Very informative 🙌🏼
PhD in Cybersecurity
7moThe paper is very interesting thank you for your sharing. I would like to add that there are existing AI-powered security LLMs that help cybersecurity analysts detect threats earlier, respond faster, and stay ahead of attacks. One example is Purple AI offered by SentinelOne. What do you think the additional benefits would be if we train ChatGPT, considering there are already existing AI-powered security LLMs?