⏱️are we in a time warp ⏱️ It’s a bit confronting to admit that I’ve been around this game long enough to have seen this same drama play out before. History doesn’t repeat itself, it Rhymes right? Well, here we go again. 20 years ago it was Organic Now it’s Regenerative. Something has to change… that’s why I started Backstory Let me tell you how this one plays out, and maybe we can collectively try to chart a different path forward? ✅1) cottage industry goes mainstream ✅2) early adopter customers are excited and buy it. It gets natural ground swell ✅3) big business realizes there’s margin in it. So there’s an arms race for the margin 4) regulators decide on an enforceable definition. 5)this then means that the nuance gets lost, often times not applicable 6) big business figures out how to game it 7) consumers get wind that all is not as it seems… (due to blunt instrument called an audit and the need to define something down, so much that it loses meaning and usefulness as agriculture is contextual and difficult to compare and audit) 8) consumers lose trust 9) new trust mark emerges …. 10) repeat steps 1-9 So either we accept we are in this merry go round of trust cycles or we decide to do things differently. I think we are ready for a change. If you got this far and you’re curious how we are solving this. Here’s a few ways 1) R&D into tech to support the consumer to be able to understand trust marks (as it stands, you need to be a farmer or an auditor to make head or tail of some of these) 2) making it easy for brands to back up their trust marks and claims with evidence … to be used in auditing but also in educating and connecting with the end consumer.
The confusion about what labels mean is really coming into focus. The cost to ethical brands is loss of trust and loss of sales ultimately. What will the cost to Fonterra be for this latest marketing effort? The truth is, no matter which trust mark you choose as a product owner or marketing professional in an ethical food, fashion, nutraceutical, cosmetics or furnishing company, you will have to demonstrate reasons to believe to your customers. (If they make their own regenerative program or they use another, either way, they will need proof and they will need to do the work in educating the consumer... this is just the life of an ethical brand marketer now.) You will need to find evidence points within your supply chain that back up the claims being made... you need evidence. Quality teams are being expanded instead of marketing teams, and this cost is only increasing. https://lnkd.in/gi4i5fDm
Good read, thanks for sharing the RNZ article Melissa.
Spot on
Brand Strategist, Design Thinking Coach, Executive Director at Launchsight.nz & Foundational.nz
6moYes, all great movements get co-opted by the good the bad and the ugly. And by that I'm not passing judgement on Fonterra, I don't know if it's a well-intentioned statement of intent, or what the article is accusing them of. I was saying to clients a couple of years ago that regen is clearly the next big thing, but the term itself WILL get bastardised Ultimately it'll demand players to back promises up with demonstrable actions to paint the picture of what great regen looks like ...which by nature will vary from place to place C