Why are joint interpretations of #investment treaties more complex than we often assume? Let's discuss this in the upcoming days in Athens! As I landed in Athens for the International Law Association biannual conference, I was thrilled to receive the news that the latest Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment 'FDI Perspectives' is out! This edition features our joint work led by Charles-Emmanuel Côté in collaboration with Shotaro Hamamoto and Xu QIAN, focusing on specific rules for joint interpretations under #InternationalInvestmentLaw. This is just a preview of our upcoming Academic Forum on ISDS paper for the UNCITRAL: United Nations Commission on International Trade Law negotiations on #InvestmentArbitration reform. Stay tuned for the full paper! In the meantime, if you’d like to learn more about it or talk about #InternationalArbitration and happen to be in Athens, let me know. Χαίρομαι να συναντηθούμε! There's never too much Greek coffee:)
Marcin J. Menkes’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
I am very happy to share with you the publication of my chapter on 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 , as a contribution to volume on "National Security and Investment Controls", edited by Jens Hillebrand Pohl, Thomas Papadopoulos & Janosch Wiesenthal (Springer Law Studies in Law & Geoeconomics) Volume 3, forthcoming. I would like to express my gratitude and thanks to the publishers of this book, and for the publication of my contribution. The chapter is now available on the Springer Law Website: https://lnkd.in/dHh7YrkZ The abstract and the link to the chapter are below.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 || We are delighted to highlight Dr. Pascale Accaoui Lorfing's significant contribution to "National Security and Investment Controls" (Springer Law, forthcoming), edited by Jens Hillebrand Pohl, Thomas Papadopoulos & Janosch Wiesenthal (Springer Studies in Law & Geoeconomics, Volume 3). Dr. Lorfing's analysis presents a nuanced view of the Security Interest (SI) provisions inserted into International Investment Agreements (IIAs), which allow states to take regulatory actions without compensating affected foreign investors under certain conditions. This paper meticulously explores the framework established by Article XXI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT, 1994), which has significantly influenced the drafting of SI provisions in IIAs. The complexity and diversity of these clauses' formulations offer a fertile ground for interpretation, which is critical as it sets the stage for arbitral tribunals' approaches to such disputes. The chapter also anticipates the potential for a harmonized interpretation through proposed guidelines and the advent of an institutional structure like a multilateral investment court. Dr. Lorfing's work is instrumental for scholars, legal practitioners, and policymakers involved in international trade and investment. #LawAndGeoeconomics #InternationalLaw #InvestmentScreening #SpringerStudies https://lnkd.in/dHh7YrkZ
The International Legal Framework for Foreign Investment Control
link.springer.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 || We are delighted to highlight Dr. Pascale Accaoui Lorfing's significant contribution to "National Security and Investment Controls" (Springer Law, forthcoming), edited by Jens Hillebrand Pohl, Thomas Papadopoulos & Janosch Wiesenthal (Springer Studies in Law & Geoeconomics, Volume 3). Dr. Lorfing's analysis presents a nuanced view of the Security Interest (SI) provisions inserted into International Investment Agreements (IIAs), which allow states to take regulatory actions without compensating affected foreign investors under certain conditions. This paper meticulously explores the framework established by Article XXI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT, 1994), which has significantly influenced the drafting of SI provisions in IIAs. The complexity and diversity of these clauses' formulations offer a fertile ground for interpretation, which is critical as it sets the stage for arbitral tribunals' approaches to such disputes. The chapter also anticipates the potential for a harmonized interpretation through proposed guidelines and the advent of an institutional structure like a multilateral investment court. Dr. Lorfing's work is instrumental for scholars, legal practitioners, and policymakers involved in international trade and investment. #LawAndGeoeconomics #InternationalLaw #InvestmentScreening #SpringerStudies https://lnkd.in/dHh7YrkZ
The International Legal Framework for Foreign Investment Control
link.springer.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Open Call for Submissions: YSEC Yearbook Volume VI! 🚀 We are thrilled to announce the Open Call for the Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions (YSEC) 2025 (Vol VI)! 📚 Theme: Domestic Law and Policy in the Regulation of Foreign Investment This edition aims to delve into the evolving significance of domestic legal frameworks in contemporary international investment law. As bilateral investment treaties (BITs) face increasing scrutiny, we observe strong demands for enhanced state involvement and a reaffirmation of sovereignty in investor-state relations. Key areas of focus include: 🌐 The transition from international to domestic investment regulation 🌱 The role of domestic laws in areas like food, agriculture, health, environment, and labor 🛡️ The impact of national constitutional principles on foreign investment protection ⚖️ The interaction between domestic and international law in investment arbitration We invite submissions exploring these and other relevant themes. Deadline for proposals: 30 September 2024 Proposal length: No more than 500 words Submission email: [email protected] Successful applicants will be notified by mid-October 2024. Join us in contributing to this critical discourse on the re-nationalization of investment screening and the evolving dynamics of domestic law in the regulation of foreign investment. We look forward to your insightful contributions! #YSEC2025 #ForeignInvestment #InternationalLaw #DomesticPolicy #CallForPapers #LegalResearch #InvestmentLaw 🔗 Find out more: https://ysec-yearbook.eu Steffen Hindelang Andreas Moberg Szilárd Gáspár-Szilágyi, PhD, LLM Eduardo Gill-Pedro Stefan Korte Nils Schaks Eva Storskrubb Suzana Tavares da Silva Paolo Vargiu Johanna Engström Dr. Teoman Hagemeyer-Witzleb Martin Johansson Gunnar Thor Petursson Jens Hillebrand Pohl Georges Vallindas
Home
https://www.ysec-yearbook.eu
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Have you thought about "Domestic Law and Policy in the Regulation of Foreign Investment"? Yes, then this call may be for you! #ysec #investmentregulation #domesticlaw #phdstudents #law #constitution #economicregulation #economicsecurity
🚀 Open Call for Submissions: YSEC Yearbook Volume VI! 🚀 We are thrilled to announce the Open Call for the Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions (YSEC) 2025 (Vol VI)! 📚 Theme: Domestic Law and Policy in the Regulation of Foreign Investment This edition aims to delve into the evolving significance of domestic legal frameworks in contemporary international investment law. As bilateral investment treaties (BITs) face increasing scrutiny, we observe strong demands for enhanced state involvement and a reaffirmation of sovereignty in investor-state relations. Key areas of focus include: 🌐 The transition from international to domestic investment regulation 🌱 The role of domestic laws in areas like food, agriculture, health, environment, and labor 🛡️ The impact of national constitutional principles on foreign investment protection ⚖️ The interaction between domestic and international law in investment arbitration We invite submissions exploring these and other relevant themes. Deadline for proposals: 30 September 2024 Proposal length: No more than 500 words Submission email: [email protected] Successful applicants will be notified by mid-October 2024. Join us in contributing to this critical discourse on the re-nationalization of investment screening and the evolving dynamics of domestic law in the regulation of foreign investment. We look forward to your insightful contributions! #YSEC2025 #ForeignInvestment #InternationalLaw #DomesticPolicy #CallForPapers #LegalResearch #InvestmentLaw 🔗 Find out more: https://ysec-yearbook.eu Steffen Hindelang Andreas Moberg Szilárd Gáspár-Szilágyi, PhD, LLM Eduardo Gill-Pedro Stefan Korte Nils Schaks Eva Storskrubb Suzana Tavares da Silva Paolo Vargiu Johanna Engström Dr. Teoman Hagemeyer-Witzleb Martin Johansson Gunnar Thor Petursson Jens Hillebrand Pohl Georges Vallindas
Home
https://www.ysec-yearbook.eu
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In their piece, Gerard J. Meijer, Piotr Wilinski, and Thomas de Boer have provided an overview of the ongoing legal battle involving Spain and intra-EU investment awards enforcement. The authors delve into a case before the District Court of Amsterdam where Spain, in its strategic legal maneuvers, argued that its obligations under an investment treaty award constitute unlawful state aid under EU law. This argument is pivotal as it challenges the #enforcement of the award within the EU, pushing the boundaries of the New York Convention and the Brussels I bis Regulation. The Amsterdam Court's interim judgment sided with Spain, granting itself jurisdiction and setting the stage for a complex interaction between EU state aid rules and international arbitration norms. This case exemplifies the intricate dance between national courts and international obligations, particularly in the realm of intra-EU investment disputes post-#Achmea. The outcome could significantly influence the enforcement landscape of #internationalarbitration awards within the EU, highlighting the tension between EU law and international treaty obligations. #investmentlaw #investmentarbitration #disputeresolution
“The Emperor’s New Clothes”: Where Does the New York Convention End and the Brussels I bis Regulation Begin?
https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Today at UNCITRAL: United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Working Group III, an interesting side event moderated by Prof. Chiara Giorgetti has addressed recent developments concerning compensation in international investment law. It emerges that treaty language is changing with the aim to attain, even in the quantum phase, 'an equitable balance between the public interest and interest of those affected'. In the quantum phase, arbitrators are called to re-establish the equilibrium broken by the wrong of the state and to award the appropriate amount of indemnity to restore the foreign investor. In this context, proportionality may play a role by enabling arbitrators to evaluate and coordinate interests and circumstances at stake. Here are a few reflections on the application of the principle of proportionality to assess compensation: https://lnkd.in/drqXMX7c
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In a somewhat unnecessary move, the #CJEU recently held the #UK to be in violation of its obligations under #EUlaw due to the #Micula-award becoming enforceable in the #UK. In its judgment, the #CJEU not only ignored the multilateral compliance nature of the obligation to enforce arbitral awards under Art. 54 #ICSID Convention, but also jumped quite a few hurdles in relation to other issues of #EUlaw. All in all, a tale of truisms, omissions and judicial fictions. In the pre-published issue of the European Investment Law and Arbitration Review, I critically analyse the judgment of the #CJEU. Thank you to Georg Scherpf, Sebastian Wuschka and Andrej Lang for critically reviewing and discussing prior drafts of this article. Thank you also to Prof. Dr. Nikos Lavranos, Szilárd Gáspár-Szilágyi, PhD, LLM and the entire editorial team of the European Investment Law and Arbitration Review for the comments and the smooth review process. Hope you enjoy my analysis! Any feedback and comments are welcome.
Hot off the press: most of the pieces of the new issue (9-2) of the European Investment Law and Arbitration Review are now available as online pre-publications! Check it out now at: https://lnkd.in/etuVsSnz Editorial Prof. Dr. Nikos Lavranos, Prof Loukas Mistelis FCIArb Chronicle 2024 on European Law and Arbitration Developments Mark McCloskey Article: The EU Model Clauses for Bilateral Investment Treaties of EU Member States With Third Countries Chrysoula Mavromati, Alexander Schubert Article: The CJEU’s Judgment in European Commission v. United Kingdom: A Tale of Truisms, Omissions, and Judicial Fictions Simon Hermes Article: EU-Angola Sustainable Investment Facilitation Agreement: Key Features, Benefits, and Impact Dr. Nathalie Potin, FCIArb Article: NAFTA’s FET Clause Is (Practically) Dead! Long Live Its Legacy!: An Empirical Survey of How Tribunals Have Interpreted FET Clauses Linked to the Minimum Standard of Treatment Patrick Dumberry Case-note: US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Holds that Spain Does Not Enjoy Sovereign Immunity from Enforcement of Intra-EU ECT Awards Carlos Ramos-Mrosovsky, Paul Levine, James J. East, Jr., Jillian Timko Case-note: A Friendly Preference? The Amicus Curiae Brief in the Nextera Case Janos Katona Case-note: Tale of A Few Cities: When International Legal Orders Collide: The UK Supreme Court Decision in Micula Nelson Goh, Henrietta Tonkin, Joseph Fox-Davies Case-note: Greek Supreme Administrative Court Extends CJEU’s Achmea and PL Holdings Jurisprudence to Contract-Based Arbitration Dimitris Babiniotis Report on the 9th EFILA Annual Conference and 3rd Young EFILA Event Ozge VARIS Varis Book Review: Commentary on the Energy Charter Treaty, edited by Rafael Leal-Arcas, 2nd Edition. (UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Published December 2023) Prof. Dr. Nikos Lavranos Lavranos
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The UniTrento School of International Studies is in Vienna for the 49th Session of UNCITRAL: United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Working Group III. In this 49th Session, WG III continues discussion on the 'Draft statute of a standing mechanism for the resolution of international investment dispute' and the 'Draft provisions on procedural and cross-cutting issues'. Among these cross cutting issues of special interest are the right to regulate and the assessment of damages and compensation.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
As the #FSR continues to be applied and interpreted through various cases, its long-term implications for the #EU’s competitive landscape and global business practices are becoming increasingly clear. Dr. Andrea Pomana, Alejandro Guerrero and Martin Gramsch of Simmons & Simmons look at the significant challenges for foreign #trade and #investments that involve #European companies. 👇 Read the full article on the Kluwer #Competition Law Blog
The Impact of the New FSR on Dealmaking in Europe
https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com
To view or add a comment, sign in