In recent years, there’s been a surge in organisations creating or refreshing their Healthcare (Clinical) Governance Frameworks, reflecting their growing importance in health technologies. These frameworks are no longer static documents but dynamic tools that shape how teams work and improve outcomes 🌟 For a framework to resonate, they need these three qualities: 🩷 Memorable 🩵 Connected 💚 Actionable While memorability lays the foundation, connection is what truly brings a framework to life. A connected governance framework aligns with the values, mission, and culture of the organisation while meeting the needs of its teams and customers. It needs to be authentic - an extension of the organisation’s identity rather than an external set of rules ✅ Creating a ‘connected’ framework requires collaboration. Teams and customers (patients, consumers, clients, carers) must be part of the development or review process so that their needs and aspirations are reflected. Without this, principles can feel disconnected, won’t resonate and struggle to gain traction🤝 Connection also means understanding the organisation’s context: its culture, leadership vision, and desired outcomes. In healthcare, this revolves around improved health and care outcomes and experiences, though how these are pursued varies. A connected framework aligns with the unique journey each organisation takes to achieve its goals 🛣️ When frameworks are connected, they are easier to implement. Teams naturally embed principles of safety, quality, and continuous improvement into their work when they can relate the outcome to their roles – whether they are providing clinical care or not 🫥 This connection is why I prefer the term “healthcare governance” over “clinical governance.” For teams outside clinical care, such as in technology or operations, “clinical” can feel exclusive. “Healthcare Governance,” however, resonates more broadly, promoting a shared ownership and inclusion across the health and care ecosystem 🪐 Ultimately, connection creates momentum. When people see themselves reflected in a framework, they are much more likely to believe in it and live by it. Connection transforms governance principles into meaningful action, helping organisations not just aim for better outcomes but realise them too 🤩 #clinicalgovernance #digitalhealth #memorable #connected #actionable #safety #quality #innovation #culture #leadership #governancethatmatters
Liz Keen you are one of the key stewards in this space across the country. Your role in this agenda is not defined by a position in an organisation. Keep leading, keep pioneering and importantly, keep being you. Onwards and upwards. Thanks for sharing 🙏🏻 #yourock
This is great Liz
I have just helped develop a nursing and midwifery clinical governance framework, but I like the thinking about reframing it to healthcare. Really interesting idea. Organisations that embrace open connected governance frameworks that connect both clinical and non clinical teams can ultimately build better systems of accountability, improve patient outcomes and increase staff satisfaction.
Love it, especially the term ‘Healthcare Governance’ and why 😊
Love this👏👏
Thanks Liz. Completely agree. And resonate very strongly with needing shared ownership and inclusion.
Clinical Governance Consultant | Director, Azderis Pty Ltd | Medical Practitioner | Legal Practitioner I CHIA
2moLove this Liz Keen! 🙌 Connection is critical - considering replacing one of my ‘7 Cs of clinical governance’ with credit to you! Will liaise... (let’s collaborate!). 😉 I agree ‘clinical governance’ can fail to resonate with non-clinicians - ‘healthcare governance’ is good. However I do think the principles should extend beyond the traditional notion of healthcare - I like the concept of ‘care governance’, to embed accountability where any care or support is provided to a vulnerable person (including ‘social care’ - a term used in the UK) - ie. where, ultimately, we adopt a duty of care for a person’s health and wellbeing, such that they place their trust in us. This trust might be in the delivery care itself, or in the advice we give, or in the technology we offer. That said, I’ve stuck to the term ‘clinical governance’ for now - mainly to maintain the ‘connection’ to terminology that’s currently used in our legislation, including aged care. And because, from my past experiences as a clinician and carer, I understand how clinical governance ought to apply broadly - to the experience of care - and to how we should be thinking about social determinants of health (which are known to profoundly impact our health and wellbeing).