2 years ago, I signed my biggest client in healthcare software development. I quickly learned that the 'Minimum Viable Product' (MVP) approach can be a dangerous myth in this field. Here's why: Patient Safety Isn't Negotiable → Healthcare software must be reliable from day one. → An MVP that 'just works' isn't enough. → Bugs and glitches can lead to realworld harm. Regulatory Hurdles → Healthcare is heavily regulated. → An MVP that doesn't meet compliance standards can cost you more than just money. → It can delay product launch by months or even years. Trust and Credibility → Healthcare providers need to trust your software. → Releasing a barebones MVP can destroy that trust. → It’s hard to rebuild once shattered. Integration Complexity → Healthcare systems are complex and multifaceted. → An MVP that doesn’t integrate well can cause more problems than it solves. Longterm Vision → An MVP is often a shortterm solution. → Healthcare software requires a longterm vision. → Planning for scalability and sustainability from the start is crucial. So, what’s the alternative? → A Minimum Lovable Product (MLP) Focus on creating a product that not only meets but exceeds expectations. → Ensure it’s safe, compliant, and reliable. → Invest in thorough testing and user feedback. Healthcare is not just another industry. → It’s about improving lives and saving them. Don’t risk it with shortcuts. What are your thoughts? Have you experienced the downsides of the MVP approach in healthcare? Share your stories and let's discuss!
Tahir Munir
6mo
Great advice!
Ayesha Yaseen
6mo
Great advice!
Experienced Software Engineer | Python, Node.js, React, Vue, React Native Expert
6moI'll keep this in mind while 💻