Would you spend on ads that aren’t designed to sell flights?
Some time back, I saw an ad by an airline that featured just an image of windows and part of a plane, and even that wasn’t clear. There was no slogan, no communication, or even a call to action. In fact, the name of the airline was barely visible. It was like McDonald's showing just half of the "M," and yet you could still guess the brand.
The brand I’m talking about is British Airways.
When booking a flight, you have limitless options with varied pricing. If XYZ Airline costs $55, then British Airways will be $155. BA simply cannot win the price war, as their operations are expensive, but they offer better food, seats, and an overall great experience.
𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤: why aren't they capitalizing on their superior features? The answer is simple: they don’t want to rely on feature and benefit positioning. Imagine paying $100 extra for better food and comfortable seats (and I’m not considering premium class). Chances are, they would lose market share.
Instead, they aim to set the right customer expectations and become the default option.
𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬𝐞𝐭: Should I pay $100 extra for a better experience with British Airways?
𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬𝐞𝐭: Should I downgrade to XYZ Airline and save $100?
If you have to compete with only price being a factor, then you haven’t created the right value.
#Communication #Advertising #BrandPotli