🌟 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐈𝐋𝐄𝐎! 🌟 We are thrilled to announce that our ILEO’s researcher Vincenzo Iaia has recently been nominated as part of the 𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐩 at the 𝐀𝐈 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐞 for drafting the Code of Practice for general-purpose AI models. The code will detail the obligations for general-purpose AI models to comply with the AI Act rules. After 9 months of iterative work, the final version of the first Code of Practice will be presented in a Closing Plenary, expected to take place in April, and published. This marks a significant step forward as we continue our work on the interfaces between 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 and 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐥𝐚𝐰, focusing on the ethical implications and evolving governance models. Vincenzo and our Director Christophe Geiger have contributed to key publications on these topics, including recent works on the policy options to address the blossoming intersections of copyright and AI: - Christophe Geiger and Vincenzo Iaia, Towards an Independent EU Regulator for Copyright Issues of Generative AI: What Role for the AI Office (But More Importantly: What's Next)?, forthcoming in Auteurs & Media 2024, preprint available here: https://lnkd.in/dRPK4mSi. - Christophe Geiger and Vincenzo Iaia, The Forgotten Creator: Towards a Statutory Remuneration Right for Machine Learning of Generative AI, in Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 52, 2024, 1-9, https://lnkd.in/d3ikK9Xt. - Christophe Geiger, Elaborating a Human Rights-Friendly Copyright Framework for Generative AI, in International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol. 55, 2024, 1129-1165, https://lnkd.in/e_ZAdJk8. At ILEO, we are committed to exploring cutting-edge issues in 𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐚𝐰 and 𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐬, and we do not only want to follow the debate but also influence it. Stay tuned for more updates on our work in this fascinating area! #AI #CopyrightGovernance #InnovationLaw #EthicsInTech
ILEO - Innovation Law and Ethics Observatory’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
If you want to learn more about the legal implications of the intersection of Generative AI and intellectual property, we have you covered with Part 2 of our in-depth series: Generative AI and Intellectual Property II: Copyright Implications for AI Inputs and Outputs. https://lnkd.in/eRvzDJ_Q In this IAPP - International Association of Privacy Professionals article, Brenda Leong, Ekene Chuks-Okeke, and Natalie Linero continue their discussion on applying the fair use doctrine to emerging GenAI technologies through recent cases and the court’s interpretation by exploring: 🔍The fair use analysis in terms of copyrighted materials used to train AI 🔍Copyright infringement and lawsuits against GenAI companies 🔍Copyright authorship for AI-generated works Make sure to read Part 1 of this series, available here https://lnkd.in/eVk5NPeu. Stay tuned for more insights on rising legal issues in the AI space from our experts at Luminos.Law. #IntellectualProperty #Copyright #GenerativeAI #AI #FairUsedoctrine #ailaw #responsibleai #aigovernance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
⚖️ As AI continues to reshape innovation, legislators are grappling with how to regulate it and how IP rights should apply to AI-assisted inventions and creative works. Hearings by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet offered diverse views on this complex issue. Director Richard A. Crudo and Summer Associate Bridget Moore highlight five key takeaways from the recent hearings relevant for industry players leveraging AI for innovation. 🔗https://lnkd.in/ejRBUiTR #AI #Innovation #IntellectualProperty
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⚖️ As AI continues to reshape innovation, legislators are grappling with how to regulate it and how IP rights should apply to AI-assisted inventions and creative works. Hearings by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet offered diverse views on this complex issue. Director Richard A. Crudo and Summer Associate Bridget Moore highlight five key takeaways from the recent hearings relevant for industry players leveraging AI for innovation. 🔗https://lnkd.in/d2apAJmu #AI #Innovation #IntellectualProperty
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⚖️ As AI continues to reshape innovation, legislators are grappling with how to regulate it and how IP rights should apply to AI-assisted inventions and creative works. Hearings by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet offered diverse views on this complex issue. Director Richard A. Crudo and Summer Associate Bridget Moore highlight five key takeaways from the recent hearings relevant for industry players leveraging AI for innovation. 🔗https://lnkd.in/eyESHDyQ #AI #Innovation #IntellectualProperty
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⚖️ As AI continues to reshape innovation, legislators are grappling with how to regulate it and how IP rights should apply to AI-assisted inventions and creative works. Hearings by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet offered diverse views on this complex issue. Director Richard A. Crudo and Summer Associate Bridget Moore highlight five key takeaways from the recent hearings relevant for industry players leveraging AI for innovation. 🔗https://lnkd.in/drb9FhFq #AI #Innovation #IntellectualProperty
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⚖️ As AI continues to reshape innovation, legislators are grappling with how to regulate it and how IP rights should apply to AI-assisted inventions and creative works. Hearings by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet offered diverse views on this complex issue. Director Richard A. Crudo and Summer Associate Bridget Moore highlight five key takeaways from the recent hearings relevant for industry players leveraging AI for innovation. 🔗https://lnkd.in/eibChwvH #AI #Innovation #IntellectualProperty
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⚖️ As AI continues to reshape innovation, legislators are grappling with how to regulate it and how IP rights should apply to AI-assisted inventions and creative works. Hearings by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet offered diverse views on this complex issue. Director Richard A. Crudo and Summer Associate Bridget Moore highlight five key takeaways from the recent hearings relevant for industry players leveraging AI for innovation. 🔗https://lnkd.in/eeUrxnKz #AI #Innovation #IntellectualProperty
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⚖️ As AI continues to reshape innovation, legislators are grappling with how to regulate it and how IP rights should apply to AI-assisted inventions and creative works. Hearings by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet offered diverse views on this complex issue. Director Richard A. Crudo and Summer Associate Bridget Moore highlight five key takeaways from the recent hearings relevant for industry players leveraging AI for innovation. 🔗https://lnkd.in/eVNzXecX #AI #Innovation #IntellectualProperty
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Our study on the impact of Share Alike/CopyLeft (SA/LA) licensing on machine learning and generative AI written by Kacper Szkalej and Martin Senftleben from the Institute for Information Law at the University of Amsterdam has been published in the SSRN repository. You can access it here 👉 https://lnkd.in/diK2JV5A #MachineLearning #genAI #CreativeCommons #CopyLeft
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⚖️ As AI continues to reshape innovation, legislators are grappling with how to regulate it and how IP rights should apply to AI-assisted inventions and creative works. Hearings by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet offered diverse views on this complex issue. Director Richard A. Crudo and Summer Associate Bridget Moore highlight five key takeaways from the recent hearings relevant for industry players leveraging AI for innovation. 🔗https://lnkd.in/eWZvSxMt #AI #Innovation #IntellectualProperty
To view or add a comment, sign in
Intellectual Property Lawyer & Researcher
5moThat’s amazing !! Congratulations Vincenzo Iaia !!