UCLA editorial board on double standards

View profile for Robert Glazer

5X Entrepreneur, #1 WSJ & USA Today Bestselling Author, Top .1% Podcast Host and Keynote Speaker. Board Chair & Founder @ Acceleration Partners

If you want to know what it looks like when individuals are repeatedly taught that their actions have no consequences and to embrace double standards openly, look no further than this morning’s #UCLA editorial board post. At first, I thought it was written from a different perspective, and I was confused. The group that illegally took over campus, built barricades, blocked people’s movement, initiated physical altercations, and lobbied for no intervention or police presence is now fully blaming administrators that things have gotten out of control and violent. Leaders in every organization today need to take careful note. This is what happens when you do not have consistent standards, values, and rules enforced equally. People then assume that whatever they do is right and permissible, and the other side is wrong. These are your future employees. Choose wisely. https://lnkd.in/e-BC5KNA

Elizabeth A. Garlovsky

Trusts & Estates Partner at Harrison LLP

10mo

The confusion quickly turned to disbelief for me. But it’s real. I can’t stop asking myself how we got here.

Hans Norden

Business Architecture │ Executive Development | Systemic Change Leadership │ Business Author │ Keynote Speaker │ Polymath │ Founder @ Anticipated Outcome │ Blogger @ RootCauseTheBook.com

10mo

IF, and I say IF, universities are about truth finding, then why aren't history faculties stepping up, explaining the origin of the conflict? After the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire (1908–1922), Britain received a mandate over Palestine, to help the Jews achieve sovereignty, from the League of Nations. At that time, there was no state of Israel, there were no refugees, there was no occupation, and there were no settlements. These things, we're told, are at the heart of the conflict. Yet, in February of 1947, British foreign minister Lord Ernest Bevin explains why Britain is throwing the mandate they received from the League of Nations back to the United Nations. He explained his decision by saying: “His majesty's government has come to the conclusion that the conflict in the land is irreconcilable. Look, in the land there are two peoples, Jews and Arabs. Each one of these groups has one top priority. For the Jews, the top priority is to have a state. For the Arabs, the top priority is for the Jews not to have a state in any part of the land." That's it. Bevin’s analysis of the conflict has proven to be the best predictor of the behavior of the sides ever since. The conflict is indeed irreconcilable!

Hans Norden

Business Architecture │ Executive Development | Systemic Change Leadership │ Business Author │ Keynote Speaker │ Polymath │ Founder @ Anticipated Outcome │ Blogger @ RootCauseTheBook.com

10mo
Like
Reply
Gary Ayris

Night Manager at Carden Park Hotel - Cheshire's Country Estate

10mo

Luke Skywalker - terrorist? It's all about perspective .....

  • No alternative text description for this image
Like
Reply
Kimberly Calabrese

Author of What "Do I DO" appeared in Forbes Magazine, Media including Fox and NBC, Radio and talk shows.

10mo

Great point that these are your future employees.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics