Gene Chuang’s Post

Terence Tao on LLM There is too much hype, hucksters and dumb money poured into GenAI and LLM now. It’s refreshing to hear from expert voice for once. Terence Tao is a UCLA math professor, Fields Medal winner and is considered the world’s greatest living mathematician. I overlapped a year with him at UCLA in 1996 and I met him when he was TA for a Linear Algebra course I took my senior year. Terence recently gave his honest feedback on GPT-o1 here https://lnkd.in/gq_6bcwM, and was subsequently interviewed by The Atlantic https://lnkd.in/gv6fgqrB I will summarize this interview: 1. OpenAI o1 is a mediocre or incompetent research assistant. 2. It does not “reason”, is not a source of knowledge or ideas, but is a really useful glue. 3. We will always need humans and AI. They have complementary strengths. AI is very good at converting billions of pieces of data into one good answer. Humans are good at taking 10 observations and making really inspired guesses. I cannot agree more with the “Mozart of Math”. Especially on point number #2. LLM is very good at doing relational joins of non-relational unstructured data. Once you realize its true strength and what it isn't, LLM can be a very powerful tool. To read more of my ponderings on "AI" and other tech stuff, subscribe to my substack: https://lnkd.in/gtknApfw

  • No alternative text description for this image
Maynard Cabellon

Senior Service Engineer at Microsoft

5mo

Regarding #2, it does not reason "yet." While I agree that current AI models don't "reason" like humans do, it's important to recognize that technology evolves very rapidly. Just as space travel was once unimaginable in the early 1900s, AI could develop reasoning capabilities in the next 5 to 10 years that we can't fully predict today. No one knows...could be sooner, could be later. I believe that anyone who emphatically asserts that AI will never reason is trying to predict the future, which is inherently uncertain. It's like saying there will never be a cure for cancer or that humans would never walk on the moon. History has shown that breakthroughs often occur when we least expect them. Full disclosure: I work under Mustafa Suleyman's AI organization at Microsoft. His passion for all things AI is truly inspiring, and he consistently keeps us updated on his thoughts and aspirations.

Like
Reply
Yannis L.

Engineer & Scientist

5mo

You’ve got to love the copium, I also felt threatened as well when I first used OpenAI codex a few years ago.

Guido Barosio

CTO @ MACHBank, Angel Investor. Change organizations, create a better world. Finalis co-founder.

5mo

Love this, absolutely on spot.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics