For part of your fiduciary duty, self-funded plans, you should be asking your carriers about #medicaldrug rebates, or under Medicare, these are considered "#PartB" drugs. These are not drugs you pick up at the corner drug store. These are the drugs that are infused as an outpatient at an infusion center, doctor's office, or even sometimes at home. Chemotherapy, drugs like infliximab, or any drug that you need to have infused are likely in the medical plan benefit, NOT the pharmacy plan or benefit. And, spoiler alert - they're often the most expensive drugs to hit plans....ever. ✅ The next time you're with your medical carrier, ask them about medical drug rebates. ✅ Then ask them about medical drug rebates as they apply to your plan, specifically. ✅ Last, ask them when you should be expecting a check on your medical drug rebates. If you get South Park blank stares, that means you're on to something. Keep asking....hold them accountable. There ARE medical drug rebates, and if your plan is paying for medical drugs, your plan should be getting drug rebates back. #pharmacy #medicaldrugs
Why you should ask your carriers about medical drug rebates
More Relevant Posts
-
Historic day for patients and drug pricing! 💊💵 Medicare's first-ever drug price negotiations could save taxpayers $6B on 10 widely used prescription drugs by 2026, including diabetes treatments, blood thinners, and a cancer medication. Prices for these drugs, revealed today by the Biden administration, will drop by up to 79%. This landmark move under the Inflation Reduction Act aims to reduce out-of-pocket costs for millions of seniors. This development is a significant step toward lowering out-of-pocket costs for Medicare enrollees and addressing the high cost of brand-name medications. As the process continues, more drugs will be selected for negotiation, further amplifying the law’s impact on reducing healthcare costs. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/gDfAeH2Y #HealthcareReform #Medicare #Pharma #DrugPricing
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
People on Medicare can face vastly different prices for the same medicine, because drug plans farm out negotiations to middlemen The cost of prescription drugs in the U.S. isn’t like the tabs for other products. The price for a single medicine can range by thousands of dollars depending on the drug plan. It is a symptom of America’s complicated—and costly—system for paying for medicines. Medicare is paying wildly different prices for the same drug, even for people insured under the same plan. As a result, people covered by Medicare can be on the hook for thousands of dollars in additional out-of-pocket costs depending on where they live and which drug plan they choose. https://buff.ly/418b4RJ
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Great insight
People are so quick to judge NADAC pricing (which Capital Rx uses) which is published by CMS, but the people that fear change are often the ones that profit from the status quo. And I quote the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) this morning: "Caremark has logged 643 different prices for Zytiga generics, while Express Scripts has 500 and Optum Rx carries 445. By comparison, Capital Rx, a PBM with fewer beneficiaries than the three largest firms, had two prices. Capital Rx had few prices—either $106 or $117—because it pegged them to the benchmark that the U.S. government uses to calculate drug costs, called the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost, which is based on a survey of retail pharmacy prices, said Chief Executive Anthony Loiacono. Capital Rx’s prices were much less than the sums that many other health plans reported. 'We don’t make money on drug spend, and I do not set prices. I use what CMS gives us as the starting point,' Loiacono said." If anyone wants to have a discussion about price volatility, please be prepared to argue from a place of logic and fact. Let's replay the tape, in the WSJ's published example: CVS (Caremark) = 643 Prices Cigna (Express Scripts) = 500 Prices United (Optum Rx) = 445 Prices Capital Rx = 2 Prices The two prices Capital Rx used during this data period: $117 or $106 That is a standard deviation of 6.36 We didn't create the prices, the federal government (CMS) provided us with the appropriate prescription price. Equally important, the pharmacies were fairly reimbursed, with no clawbacks, penalties, or variable pricing nonsense. Lastly, when people argue about NADAC price volatility, I wonder if they are even looking at the data. NADAC can experience variability, but it is negative variance (-5% to -15%), which means our customer's YOY prices on generics are falling with actual manufacturer costs. In comparison, AWP is flat over the same period (0% to 1%). Remember, the pricing benchmark (NADAC or AWP) is just the starting point for pricing, our detractors say nothing about the Actual Price the PATIENT RECEIVES under traditional PBM pricing! You say you don't like volatility? How about 400 prices for the same drug? Or 500 prices?? Or over 600 prices??? Nobody wants to talk about this volatility? Until today... I will say it again, and probably not for the last time... Capital Rx does not make money on drugs. Capital Rx is the new standard for pharmacy benefit administration, not just because we are free of conflicts on all clinical, fulfillment, and pricing decisions, but because our technology (JUDI) enables us to deliver the efficiency, precision, and service levels plan sponsors deserve. To quote the motto of our client, Johns Hopkins University: Veritas vos liberabit The truth will set you free.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Pharmacy Spend: Always a hot topic come renewal season... but we can help contain costs! How? Well I can't share everything about our Employee Engagement/Communications strategies, that's no fun! Please DM me if you would like to discuss what we've been implementing for our clients. #PowerThroughPartnership
How is your organization working to contain rising pharmacy costs? As of 2024, 55% of total U.S. prescription drug spending is attributed to specialty medications, despite these drugs being used by only 1-2% of the population. The high cost and complexity of these treatments necessitate continuous clinical education for pharmacy professionals. Specialty drugs often cost upwards of $3,500 per month, and staying abreast of the latest therapies, treatment protocols, and drug management techniques is critical for both patient safety and cost control. Read the full blog: https://bit.ly/40kYsGy #PowerThroughPartnership #EmployeeBenefits
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
How is your organization working to contain rising pharmacy costs? As of 2024, 55% of total U.S. prescription drug spending is attributed to specialty medications, despite these drugs being used by only 1-2% of the population. The high cost and complexity of these treatments necessitate continuous clinical education for pharmacy professionals. Specialty drugs often cost upwards of $3,500 per month, and staying abreast of the latest therapies, treatment protocols, and drug management techniques is critical for both patient safety and cost control. Read the full blog: https://bit.ly/40kYsGy #PowerThroughPartnership #EmployeeBenefits
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I have written before with conviction and faith about NADAC pricing for drugs reimbursed to pharmacies. Why retail and independent pharmacies cling to faulty PBM contracts with the usual suspect of reimbursement benchmark of AWP. AWP is archaic and it certainly does not favor a pharmacy. As a Founder & CEO of a Hospice PBM and my past business experience of owning a pharmacy for over 20 years - pharmacies especially the independents have a soft place in my heart. That is why I believe treating the independent pharmacy as your partner we can all share in the success of the paying client or the customer as a happy customer. Margins are tight and the squeeze is tightening further. CMS gave all hospice providers a 2.5% increase. In the hospice PBM world think of it this way the average national cost per patient per day is around $12.50. Now reflect on all other nursing costs, visit costs, caregiver costs, aids etc and then you realize AWP is hurting the paying client not helping. Cap Rx keep on, keeping on!
People are so quick to judge NADAC pricing (which Capital Rx uses) which is published by CMS, but the people that fear change are often the ones that profit from the status quo. And I quote the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) this morning: "Caremark has logged 643 different prices for Zytiga generics, while Express Scripts has 500 and Optum Rx carries 445. By comparison, Capital Rx, a PBM with fewer beneficiaries than the three largest firms, had two prices. Capital Rx had few prices—either $106 or $117—because it pegged them to the benchmark that the U.S. government uses to calculate drug costs, called the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost, which is based on a survey of retail pharmacy prices, said Chief Executive Anthony Loiacono. Capital Rx’s prices were much less than the sums that many other health plans reported. 'We don’t make money on drug spend, and I do not set prices. I use what CMS gives us as the starting point,' Loiacono said." If anyone wants to have a discussion about price volatility, please be prepared to argue from a place of logic and fact. Let's replay the tape, in the WSJ's published example: CVS (Caremark) = 643 Prices Cigna (Express Scripts) = 500 Prices United (Optum Rx) = 445 Prices Capital Rx = 2 Prices The two prices Capital Rx used during this data period: $117 or $106 That is a standard deviation of 6.36 We didn't create the prices, the federal government (CMS) provided us with the appropriate prescription price. Equally important, the pharmacies were fairly reimbursed, with no clawbacks, penalties, or variable pricing nonsense. Lastly, when people argue about NADAC price volatility, I wonder if they are even looking at the data. NADAC can experience variability, but it is negative variance (-5% to -15%), which means our customer's YOY prices on generics are falling with actual manufacturer costs. In comparison, AWP is flat over the same period (0% to 1%). Remember, the pricing benchmark (NADAC or AWP) is just the starting point for pricing, our detractors say nothing about the Actual Price the PATIENT RECEIVES under traditional PBM pricing! You say you don't like volatility? How about 400 prices for the same drug? Or 500 prices?? Or over 600 prices??? Nobody wants to talk about this volatility? Until today... I will say it again, and probably not for the last time... Capital Rx does not make money on drugs. Capital Rx is the new standard for pharmacy benefit administration, not just because we are free of conflicts on all clinical, fulfillment, and pricing decisions, but because our technology (JUDI) enables us to deliver the efficiency, precision, and service levels plan sponsors deserve. To quote the motto of our client, Johns Hopkins University: Veritas vos liberabit The truth will set you free.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Have you ever wondered about 340B, the obscure federal program ... that all of a sudden everyone is commenting about? Well, even if you haven't, I have a great read for you: Yesterday MDH's Health Economics Program released findings from the nation’s first state transparency initiative on the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program. The 340B program allows qualified safety-net hospitals and health care providers to purchase outpatient drugs at discounted prices that can be as much as 50% below retail pricing. Many entities are then able to charge market rates for some portion of these drugs, thereby generating net revenue from the program. On the other hand, many safety-net providers, including particularly FQHCs, provide their patients drugs for free, thereby reducing their losses. In our analysis, MDH determined Minnesota’s participating providers earned a collective net revenue of at least $630 million for the 2023 calendar year. Based on national data, MDH believes this figure may represent as little as half of the actual total 340B revenue for Minnesota providers. This is due to providers not yet fully reporting revenue earned from the difference between acquisition cost and reimbursement for high-priced office-administered drugs. Although the report is extensive, it is limited to the questions the Minnesota Legislature posed, thereby leaving a number of relevant questions unaddressed. Second-year data will help close some of the remaining knowledge gaps, as will ongoing analytic work. More information about the first step of this nation-leading initiative is available in MDH’s report to the Minnesota Legislature: https://lnkd.in/gkS6cEYi
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I could be wrong, but here's another example why I believe the government will not fix pharmacy reimbursement issues like many owners hope it will. From what I've seen, it costs a pharmacy at least $10 to dispense a prescription in addition to the drug cost to cover Drug Utilization Review by the pharmacist and other staff labor and overhead costs. Average gross profit per prescription below that is what has led to 2,200+ pharmacies closing across the country in the first 8 months of 2024. The pharmacies that have managed to remain open are continuing to be burdened by more work with less resources resulting in more negative experiences at the counter for both patients and pharmacy staff. Now CMS wants to put together a list of drugs to pay pharmacies $2 per prescription to fill and wants stakeholder input on what generic drugs to include. You won't see me signing up for that contract anytime soon.....or ever. https://lnkd.in/dybQHwMh
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
NEW: The Federal Trade Commission confirms that #PBMs drive up costs for prescription drugs and overcharge patients for cancer drugs. The new report – which also notes that PBMs did not cooperate with their investigation – is just the latest evidence from federal watchdogs that Congress must act to break the incentives that allow these middlemen to dominate healthcare. #drugpricing #prescriptiondrugs #healthcarecosts #healthcarepolicy #PBMreforms https://lnkd.in/gEg2GjAq
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Ever notice how your PBM seems to favor brand-name drugs over generics? It's not a coincidence – it's a profit strategy. Here's what to watch for 👇 ❌ Accepting "clinical necessity" claims at face value ✅ Demanding reports on ALL brand vs. generic choices Here's why: Most PBMs earn higher rebates from brand-name drugs - meaning they make more money when you spend more. We recently analyzed a mid-sized employer's drug spend and found over $850,000 in unnecessary brand-name prescriptions where generics were available. The PBM's explanation? "Clinical necessity." Yet when examined, less than 5% had valid clinical reasons for choosing the brand-name option. As a Fiduciary PBM, we're contractually and ethically bound to prioritize generics whenever clinically appropriate. Full Disclosure means showing you exactly why each drug choice was made - no hidden agendas, no rebate games. Want to see what's really driving your pharmacy spend? Let's talk:https://disclosedrx.com/ #PBMReform #EmployeeBenefits #DrugCosts #HealthcareCosts
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
More from this author
-
Celebrate 2 Years of Savings with the Team Cuban Card & Cost Plus Drugs: #ProjectRollcall
Erin L. Albert, MBA, PharmD, JD, DASPL 💊 2w -
The Last Box of Donuts
Erin L. Albert, MBA, PharmD, JD, DASPL 💊 4mo -
The Chief Benefits Officer: Did Mark Cuban Hand Pharmacy an Entirely New Career Path?
Erin L. Albert, MBA, PharmD, JD, DASPL 💊 11mo
Health Policy Regulatory and Legislative Expertise; Market Innovator
6moMedical drug rebates are small because asp is a net pricing metric. There are exceptions. The problem with medical,drugs is that they often are paid by private plans to providers and rates that exceed asp, 169 percent etc.