I have news to share: In the upcoming months, you will see more of me in Business Insider Gründerszene as I share some of my perspectives on the startup ecosystem as a founder turned investor. First up: Why do start-up companies with remote-only employees face significant disadvantages, and why am I reluctant to invest in them? A take that I’m aware everyone won’t agree with... but I rest my case here! Here are three key takeaways: The importance of a strong corporate culture: A strong corporate culture, built when actually working together, is essential for the success of all startups. It fosters engagement and builds loyalty - crucial for a company’s stability and growth, especially during uncertain times. The risks of remote work: Remote work increases the risk of communication errors, delays in information sharing, team-building challenges, and potential employee isolation, which can hinder team development. The importance of a balanced approach: Hybrid teams must invest in building and maintaining a strong corporate culture through regular in-person interactions, team-building sessions, and coaching to keep employees motivated. Thanks to the team at Gründerszene for a great collaboration – more to come! Read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/dgD-KUBr
Thx, Doreen, very curious to follow that. Culture: the most important “thing” for humans is social connections and if you are able to build that in a company everything becomes easier. It needs dedicated focus but pays off in good times and in bad times. Remote work: we increased the amount of events in order to bring everyone together more often. Just a small piece but strengthens the feeling of belonging.
Interesting perspective. I am also a big fan of ongoing communication training!
😍😍
Product @ easycheck by edding | B2B SaaS | co-founder of 🚴♂️ joinride.cc
9moInteresting take. Would love to know more (can't read the article). In my view it always depends on the setup and the rigour, that is placed on the way of working. I would agree, that there is something of the in-person collaboration, that can't be replicated with any of the existing technologies. It of course first depends on the definitions, but hybrid is in my view the worst situation. What I like about a remote-first approach, is the need for proper async communication. Especially in fast-past, growing startups, this also helps a lot in bringing new joiners up to speed. But yes, this requires discipline. But in my experience this discipline is way easier forgotten in hybrid setups. I always live by the mantra: "If one person is remote, then everyone should feel like being remote". It's too easy to be left out of the coffee chat if you are not, like everyone else, in the same location. What you refer to as the balanced approach is in my view the essentials to make fully remote work. If in your definition remote teams never meet, then I would fully agree with you. Happy to hear your thoughts on it Doreen Huber