From today's Cynopsis newsletter: There is a significant frequency imbalance in political advertising, according to programmatic media partner MiQ. On CTV, 80% of targeted households received 19% of tracked impressions at an average frequency of 4.5x, while the remaining 20% of households received 81% of impressions at an average frequency of 77, according to new election TV data. On linear TV, 80% of households accounted for 20% of tracked impressions at an average frequency of 18x, with the top 20% of households receiving 80% of impressions at an average frequency of 301. "The long-standing perception has been that shifting ad spend from linear TV to CTV would help flatten the frequency curve," said Jesse Contario, MiQ’s RVP of Political. "However, our analysis clearly demonstrates that the frequency skew on CTV is just as problematic as it is on linear TV today. Simply buying streaming does not inherently solve the challenge; how you buy streaming is what matters most.” Translation: Simply moving political ads to digital is not the solution many people thought it would be.
Derek Newton’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
StackAdapt’s Ultimate Guide to Connected TV Advertising is here! Discover why 86% of Europeans use CTV and how 90%+ of CTV ad spend is traded programmatically—a trend expected to drive UK ad spending to £2.94bn by 2028. 📥 What’s Inside: 🔹 Steps to launch CTV campaigns 🔹 Creative tips for standout ads 🔹 Insights on programmatic growth 👉 Download the guide today and supercharge your campaigns: https://lnkd.in/eyA7zfu4 #CTVAdvertising #DigitalMarketing #ProgrammaticAds
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Local TV advertising is stepping to the forefront of 2025 media strategies. But as this article points out, local does not mean 'small' when it comes to technology, measurement, and strategies available. "Brands and agencies approaching local advertising are increasingly expected to pair linear with CTV, which will be important in 2025 as broadcasters try to at least hold steady in core advertising, which is predicted to end up somewhere between -3% and +3%." Read the article "Collaboration Is Key To Successful Cross-Platform Local Ad Solutions," by #PaigeAlbiniak/TVNewsCheck ttps://https://lnkd.in/egyuG6CX
Collaboration Is Key To Successful Cross-Platform Local Ad Solutions - TV News Check
https://tvnewscheck.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Very interesting analysis from MediaPost on the 7.4% drop in Q1 national TV ad revenue, highlighting the dynamic shifts within broadcast and cable TV networks. I think this trend underscores the importance of strategic content planning and diversification in today's fragmented media landscape. How should marketers adjust their strategies in response to these evolving consumption patterns? #AdvertisingTrends #MediaPlanning #MarketingStrategy #TVAdvertising https://lnkd.in/eJFZ5tRZ
National TV Ad Revenue Sinks 7.4% To $7.2B In Q1: Analyst
mediapost.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Founder - Legacy #FAST pioneer upgrading #fastchannels to #ViewTV #CTV #contentstrategy for ad-funded #streamingmedia & #television for best in industry monetization. Emyther me at - [email protected]
The Perils of Programmatic: A Lighthearted Look at CTV and FAST Channel Advertising. In the realm of Connected TV (CTV) and Free Ad-Supported Television (FAST) channels, programmatic advertising was once seen as the hero poised to rescue content studios from financial struggles. However, as the story unfolds, it's clear that not all tales have a happy ending. Programmatic has now taken on a new moniker - Problematic, casting a shadow over media companies of all sizes. Read more about the challenges of programmatic advertising in CTV and the FAST channels here: [Link to the article] #CTV #FAST #Advertising #Media #ProgrammaticAdvertising
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
📺 The CTV advertising market has moved past inventory scarcity, entering an era where audience reach alone is no longer enough to succeed. TV advertising is now more competitive than ever, pushing traditional TV players – broadcasters and pay-TV operators to adapt to the rules of digital advertising. Read our newest blog post by Marija Masalskis, research director at Caretta Research and explore how the rise of CTV, shoppable ads and retail media is reshaping the market in 2025. 👇
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Before everyone departs for the south of France, I thought it would be good to review the Five Things All Advertisers Should Know About Addressable Advertising. TV Buyers should allocate a minimum of 10% of their budget to Addressable. #GoAddressable #DoAdvertisingBetter
Five Things All Advertisers Should Know - Go Addressable
https://goaddressable.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Little Agreement on Where TV Ad Audience Is? - Dick Tracy! Research from three different firms each paint a different picture of where the TV ad audience is, complicating decision-making for advertisers and programming executives alike. Venerable ratings firm Nielsen reports a roughly even split, with 48% of viewing across a combination of broadcast and cable TV and 41% on streaming. Comcast’s FreeWheel describes a much more lopsided split, with 71% of viewing from OTT and 29% via traditional TV. FreeWheel’s measurements include virtual pay-TV providers among the OTT category, but counts TV Everywhere apps from cable operators as traditional TV. Media measurement firm Comscore comes to the opposite conclusion, crediting streaming with only 13% of viewing, while cable and broadcast boast 43% each for a combined 87%. Comscore’s data only measures ad viewing, so it fails to capture SVOD customers on ad-free plans entirely, while those on “ad-light” or paid with ads plans see fewer ads compared to traditional TV viewers. With so much disagreement on a simple metric like this, and particularly with so many measurement choices that can have huge impacts on the numbers, it’s becoming impossible for the TV industry to make any sense of its own data. OmniChannel Media Platform equals cross platform "Experiential Journey Data" which equals more macros to serve, which equals hyper-targeted data that equal conversions for advertisers, and much higher CPMs and targeted audience measurements. Prefer the solution, not evaluating the obvious discrepancies. #NextGenStreaming #FreeCast #NoMoreAppDiving #EndtheStreamingChaos #YouBundle https://lnkd.in/eNPEcBCW
Three conflicting views of where the TV ad audience is
https://nscreenmedia.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Despite the ever-changing landscape of TV advertising, this year's upfront might not be as different as anticipated. According to a survey by iSpot.tv, 27% of advertisers are planning to spend either a bit more or much more compared to last year. Despite the rise of streaming options, it seems traditional TV still holds its ground for advertisers. See more insights from the survey at Broadcasting & Cable: https://lnkd.in/gUsDaQ7V
27% of Advertisers To Spend More in Upfronts: iSpot Survey
nexttv.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Josh Chaisn makes the case that: 1) broadcast TV impressions will continue to decline as viewers shift to streaming 2) streamers will continue offer ad-free tiers that are attractive to consumers with significant disposable income 3) consequently it will be harder to reach wealthier audiences with broadcast & connected TV Personally, I think this is going to be more pronounced for advertisers seeking younger audiences with disposable income as broadcast TV becomes an increasingly greying medium. Chaisn goes on to argue that this will result in lower frequency when targeting this elusive demographic and that the best solution is to focus efforts on using high-quality creative & ad context to generate 'resonance' with target audiences. I like the sound of this, as it makes a case for the importance of brand-safe, premium, CTV inventory. But that might just be my biases. What do you think? https://lnkd.in/e2kcAmNj
With TV Impressions Vanishing, Campaigns Must Focus On Resonance, Not Frequency | AdExchanger
adexchanger.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
✅🖥️ Mediapost (4/15): “Linear TV is still the primary channel for mass marketing and a pivotal component for legacy players -- it's shrinking but not going away anytime soon,” writes media analysts for Bernstein. The stock research firm expects CTV ad inventory to end up growing 3% in the first quarter of this year, with linear inventory sinking 6% year-over-year. Streaming’s ad inventory will rise 60% in the first quarter of this year. Linear’s ad decline is due to consistent cord-cutting by consumers of traditional pay TV-video bundles, which was down 11% in 2023. Adding in newer virtual, internet delivered pay TV bundles still results in a 6% fall in subscribers.” ⬇️ #streamingtv #ctvadvertisng #cordcutting https://lnkd.in/e-M39jhW
Linear TV Programs Make Up 85% Of Connected TV, CTV Ads Rising 3%: Analyst
mediapost.com
To view or add a comment, sign in