Allowing flexible working and working from home creates a more productive, loyal workforce, UK Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said. Read more: https://bbc.in/4gr89ZQ
Working from home is great but I prefer a hybrid model. If one lives relatively close to an office I like the occasional day at the office for scheduled face-to-face collaborative efforts. And early on in a new job, I prefer an intensive 1 or 2-week period in the office to meet as many people face-to-face as possible to build relationships. But without a doubt, if one has a position where they can work on their own well, then working from home is a massive benefit to both employee and employer.
I prefer being in the office.
Not possible in all industries
It all depends on the industry and the needs of the team. My team are field based 80% of the week. I see them in the field and get to an office with them all once a fortnight to month. I find busy offices distracting and I'm far less productive than when I can close my home office door, focus and get on with my day. When I stop to grab a brew, I can let the dogs out or put laundry in while the kettle boils. I can go for my morning runs without being up at 4:30am to run and get a commute in. And I don't have to worry about being stuck in traffic, sometimes for hours in M5 holiday season. Instead I find myself working past knock off time to fit the week in, or I'm able to reply to emails later in the day if they're in late. But, it's not the right fit for everyone, some people lack the drive and self discipline to crack on, but that shouldn't mean those who are effective from home are forced back in.
From experience working from home can create a more productive and loyal workforce, as can working at the office. It’s dependent on the people working for you, not the location! Just my humble opinion.
I love the flexibility of hybrid working. As a carer for my daughter and my elderly parents getting a work/life balance can be hard but hybrid working gives me the best of both worlds. I thrive on the office energy when I’m in the actual office and even the commute, which I do by bicycle, gives me valuable head space. Being at home allows me to valuable’me’ time which I’d lose if commuting all the time but also I can make more personal phone calls too. By being in the office I contribute to the local firms when I purchase lunch or no out for bits and pieces. So for me the 40/60 ratio works well.
I work from home. I have done since 2004. I like it because it's flexible. I decide the days and times that I work. As I work outdoors I can dodge any showers etc. My wife and I have 2 kids. Both have health problems so I'm available to deal with any problems most of the time while my wife works 10 miles away. I've also had enough of bosses/supervisors looking over my shoulder. I am gps tracked but as long as the work gets done my boss doesn't seem too bothered.
How can someone who has never held a real job in his life be appointed Business Secretary and make decisions on working from home. He really does need to ‘get out there’ and understand business, how it works and the implications of his ridiculous ill informed decisions.
Mixed messages as they appear to obtain cybersecurity from Amazon who want everyone back at work at the coalface next year...
Radio Presenter, Event Host, Voice Over Artist Available
2moCan open up opportunities for excellent people who don't live near the business hubs. It give businesses access to the best people based on their abilities and skills and not their location. It also negates the need for empty disaster recovery buildings etc....