Waleed A. Alballaa’s Post

Founders, besides valuation and terms, board members can make or break your company so make sure you factor that in when selecting your next investors. #Governance #VC #BoD

View profile for Jonathan Lehr

Co-Founder/General Partner at Work-Bench

On VC board member archetypes... I caught up with a founder about board members, and as we talked about pros/cons of different folks and firms, we came up with this rubric. ❓ What do you think? 🤔 Are any archetypes missing? Ranked Best to Worst: 1. The GOAT -- Active, strategic, and operationally supportive helping with feedback on business direction, goals, hiring, GTM, fundraising, and more. Unfortunately these folks are rare! 2. The Quiet Killer -- Mainly quiet, but pithy when they speak and usually killers who are spot on in their business assessments that end up highly impactful 3. The Shy One -- Almost completely quiet in board meetings but reads every line of prep material and behind the scenes emails relevant thoughts or questions in advance 1:1 to the founder 4. The Tech Debater -- Usually a former founder or SV exec turned VC; they tend to overindex on debating tech stack choices and product roadmaps without spending enough time on the broader points around company milestones, hiring needs, GTM strategy, operational issues, etc 5. The Checked Out -- Shows up to meetings (usually) but doesn't contribute anything to the convo. Not involved with the founder outside of board meetings either. So basically just along for the ride 6. The Replacement -- When a Partner leaves a firm, the replacement gets assigned to this orphaned company. Since they didn't lead the deal initially or track its progress closely, they often play a role similar to the checked out board member above. This is especially tough for a founder when an orphaned company has a difficult fundraise ahead or needs a bridge 7. The Meddler -- this is the absolute worst archetype and needs to be avoided at all costs. This board member constantly bothers the CEO and Finance lead with assignments that are not strategic and end up being complete time sucks. The cycle continues in a horrible feedback loop of constant meddling and new assignments given, with no strategic guidance or actual support ever provided. The founders and execs get distracted from actually running the business and new investors don't want to deal with them on the board.

Khurram Javed Mir

Co-Founder/Chief Marketing Officer

5mo

Absolutely.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics