Leadership Beyond Metrics: Cultivating Team Excellence in QA šš¤ In QA, success isnāt just about achieving metrics like defect counts or test coverageāitās about empowering the people behind those achievements. Over the years, Iāve had the privilege of mentoring 50+ engineers, guiding them toward innovation, collaboration, and ownership. Hereās what Iāve learned about building exceptional QA teams: 1ļøā£ Empower Ownership Encourage engineers to view testing as more than validationāitās about preventing issues before they occur. By fostering ownership of projects, team members become proactive in addressing risks and gaps. Example: I established a āTest Ownership Programā where team members led end-to-end quality for a module, enhancing confidence and accountability. 2ļøā£ Foster Continuous Learning The QA landscape is evolving rapidly, and upskilling is non-negotiable. Iāve introduced: Regular knowledge-sharing sessions on tools like Selenium, RestAssured, and JMeter. Pairing juniors with experienced QA engineers to bridge knowledge gaps. The result? A 30% improvement in team efficiency and more leaders emerging from within. 3ļøā£ Recognize Innovation Metrics are milestones, but innovation is the goal. Celebrating out-of-the-box solutions keeps teams motivated and invested. Example: When one team member automated a manual bug triage process, reducing triage time by 40%, we shared their achievement organization-wide, reinforcing a culture of innovation. 4ļøā£ Build a Safe Space for Collaboration A QA team functions best when thereās trust. I prioritize: ā Open feedback loops. ā Inclusive brainstorming sessions that value every voice. ā Team retrospectives to celebrate wins and address challenges constructively. Why It Matters: Strong leadership transforms QA teams from ātestersā to quality championsāprofessionals who donāt just ensure software works but elevate the entire development lifecycle. Whatās Your Take? Whatās your favorite approach to nurturing QA leaders? Letās collaborate and build a future of innovative, empowered teams! #QALeadership #SoftSkills #QualityAssurance #Mentorship #TeamExcellence #Leadership
Angandeep Kr Chatterjeeās Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Hey, Everybody! Today I would like to share my thoughts about scaling QA Team Management: Leading a Team of 40 vs. 100 Engineers. Managing a team of software testing engineers is always a challenge, but the strategies that work for a team of 40 can quickly fall apart when that number grows to 100. Scaling isnāt just about adding more people ā itās about evolving how the team operates and how leadership ensures efficiency, quality, and collaboration. Key Differences Between Managing 40 vs. 100 QA Engineers 1ļøā£ Team Structure 40 Engineers: A flatter structure is often effective. Teams can be grouped by projects or features, and direct communication between team members and leadership remains feasible. 100 Engineers: Requires layered management. Sub-teams or squads need dedicated leads to maintain alignment and reduce bottlenecks in decision-making. Organizational design becomes critical. 2ļøā£ Communication 40 Engineers: Regular all-hands meetings and direct updates from leadership work well. 100 Engineers: Communication needs to scale. Structured channels like newsletters, team-specific standups, and middle management become necessary to ensure everyone stays informed. 3ļøā£ Process Complexity 40 Engineers: Agile processes are easier to implement with fewer people. A unified toolset and shared practices across the team usually suffice. 100 Engineers: Process standardization becomes essential. Teams may need to adopt frameworks like SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework) to manage dependencies and ensure consistent reporting across squads. 4ļøā£ Tooling and Automation 40 Engineers: Tools can be tailored to specific project needs. Custom solutions are manageable. 100 Engineers: Scalability and standardization are key. The focus shifts to enterprise-grade tools that integrate seamlessly and support cross-team collaboration. 5ļøā£ Culture and Motivation 40 Engineers: Culture is easier to maintain with personal connections and regular one-on-one interactions. 100 Engineers: Requires intentional effort to preserve a sense of belonging. Initiatives like leadership town halls, cross-team mentorship programs, and recognition platforms become vital. 6ļøā£ Leadership Focus 40 Engineers: Leaders can remain hands-on, directly influencing both strategy and operations. 100 Engineers: Leaders must shift focus to empowering middle management, setting a long-term vision, and aligning teams to broader organizational goals. Final Thoughts :) Scaling a QA team from 40 to 100 engineers isnāt just about handling more people; itās about evolving processes, tools, and leadership styles to manage complexity and sustain performance. š” What are your experiences with managing large QA teams? Share your thoughts or letās connect to discuss! #TeamManagement #Leadership #QualityAssurance #SoftwareTesting #ScalingTeams
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
š¤ Trust and Understanding in IT Teams: The Key to Success š In the ever-evolving world of technology, trust and mutual understanding arenāt just ānice to haveāātheyāre a necessity. A team that trusts each other works faster, solves problems more efficiently, and creates truly innovative solutions. š” When developers, QA engineers, PMs, and leadership are on the same page, projects run smoothly, challenges turn into opportunities, and the team grows together. Without trust? Miscommunication, blame games, and delays become the norm. š¹ Communicate openly š¹ Encourage feedback š¹ Support each otherās growth The best teams are built not just on skills, but on trust. How is it in your team? Letās discuss in the comments! š š P.S. The photo is a joke, so no hate! Thanks for understanding. #ITTeams #TrustInTeams #Collaboration #Leadership #Agile #DevTeam
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
š Building Agile, High-Performing QA Teams in Fast-Paced Environments š In todayās tech and product-driven companies, quality assurance isnāt just a roleāitās a mindset that must be embraced by everyone. Throughout my career, Iāve led QA teams in creating solid foundations with agile practices, shift-left testing, and CI/CD pipelines. These strategies empower teams to catch issues early, deliver continuously, and drive impactful outcomes. š š Quality at Every Step: Leveraging agile testing, real-time CI/CD, and essential DORA metrics, weāve built a cross-functional culture where QA and engineering teams adapt swiftly to product demands without compromising quality. In this fast-paced landscape, quality is everyoneās responsibility š, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement is crucial. šŖ š” Tips for Starting a Shift-Left Transition: - Begin with Small Experiments: Start shift-left with pilot projects to understand impact and adjust processes. - Invest in Automation and CI/CD: Automate repetitive tasks and build continuous feedback into each stage. - Foster a Quality Mindset: Involve QA early in planning and design. - Measure and Improve: Track progress using metrics and refine continuously. What are your thoughts or approaches for building a strong quality culture? š¤ For more information on DORA metrics, you can read further here: https://lnkd.in/dMQcFdFZ #QualityAssurance #AgileTesting #ShiftLeft #Tech #DORAMetrics #ContinuousImprovement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
š The Importance of a Quality-First Mindset Across Teams š ļø As a QA Lead with over 11 years of experience, I've seen one truth consistently emerge: Quality is everyoneās responsibility. Yet, too often, quality assurance is treated as the final checkpoint, a siloed effort limited to the QA team. In todayās fast-paced development cyclesāwhere Agile, DevOps, and CI/CD are the normsāthis approach is no longer sustainable. Hereās why adopting a quality-first mindset across teams is critical: š” 1. Quality Begins at the Requirements Stage A clear, collaborative discussion at the very start ensures fewer ambiguities and defects downstream. When developers, testers, product owners, and designers align early, quality is baked inānot patched later. š” 2. Developers as the First Line of Defense By encouraging developers to adopt practices like test-driven development (TDD) and rigorous code reviews, we shift left, catching bugs before they reach QA. š” 3. Empowering QA as Quality Enablers QA teams arenāt just testersāthey are quality advocates. A quality-first mindset means QA leads the charge in educating, guiding, and collaborating with teams to build robust processes. š” 4. Continuous Feedback Loops Whether through automated testing, performance monitoring, or user feedback, creating a feedback-rich environment ensures quality at every stage of development. š” 5. Culture of Accountability When every team memberāregardless of roleāfeels ownership over quality, the results are profound: fewer bugs, higher customer satisfaction, and faster time-to-market. āØ The key takeaway? Quality isnāt a task; itās a mindset. By fostering collaboration, empowering teams, and integrating quality practices throughout the SDLC, we can deliver products that exceed expectations. Letās start a conversation: ā”ļø How do you promote a quality-first mindset in your teams? ā”ļø What challenges have you faced in implementing it? Iād love to hear your thoughts and experiences! š #QualityFirst #SoftwareTesting #TeamCollaboration #Agile #QALeadership
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
š¤ Key Decision Point for Product Leaders: When Should You Automate QA? As product managers, we often face this crucial question: When is the right time to invest in QA automation? Here's what I've learned: MVP Phase: - Focus on rapid validation - Manual testing usually suffices - Exception: Automate only business-critical features (payments, security) Feature Expansion Phase: - Automation becomes crucial when: Ā 1. Manual regression testing slows down new feature development Ā 2. Release cycles need to speed up Ā 3. Mission-critical features are being added š Key Insight: The tipping point isn't about team size or product maturityāit's about maintaining velocity while ensuring quality. What's your experience? When did you know it was time to automate? Full Thread Found Here: https://lnkd.in/gwhHhX-c #ProductManagement #QA #Automation #TechLeadership #ProductDevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
In today's Agile environments, the role of Quality Assurance (QA) is undergoing a significant transformation. Gone are the days when testers merely acted as gatekeepers at the end of the development cycle. Now, QA professionals are essential members of cross-functional teams, actively participating in every phase of the development process. This evolution necessitates a shift in our testing methodologies. We must embrace a more collaborative approach, working hand-in-hand with developers and product owners from the very beginning. By fostering strong partnerships and open communication, we can not only enhance the quality of our products but also streamline the development process, leading to faster delivery and increased customer satisfaction. As we navigate this changing landscape, I invite you to reflect on your own experiences within Agile settings. How has your role as a QA professional evolved? What strategies have you found effective in integrating QA into Agile teams? Letās share insights and explore ways to further strengthen the collaboration between QA and development teams. Together, we can drive excellence in our Agile practices. #Agile #QualityAssurance #Collaboration #ContinuousImprovement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Hesitate to ask for help? A while back, I was working on a project that required integrating a new feature into an existing systemāone that was heavily outdated and barely documented. Initially, I thought I could handle it alone, but after days of hitting roadblocks, I realized I needed help. I reached out to a senior engineer who had worked on the system years ago, a QA lead who had deep knowledge of its quirks, and a product manager who understood the business impact. What happened next was a masterclass in collaboration. The senior engineer helped me navigate the legacy code, pointing out hidden dependencies. The QA lead anticipated potential failures before they even happened, saving us debugging time. The product manager ensured our solution aligned with real user needs, preventing unnecessary complexity. What could have taken weeks of trial and error was resolved in daysānot because of individual brilliance, but because of shared knowledge and teamwork. Lesson learned: Asking for help isnāt a weaknessāitās a strategic move. The best teams arenāt the ones with the smartest individuals; theyāre the ones that leverage collective intelligence to move faster and smarter. #Teamwork #Collaboration #Leadership #ProblemSolving
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
From growing your team to building rapport ā leading a large testing team requires more than just skills! Leading a team of over 20 testers requires more than just management; it requires leadership. As I continue to scale our testing team, the focus is not just on expanding the team but on doing so with purpose and vision. Hereās how Iām driving success in leading a large team of manual and automation testers: Build Trust and Rapport š¤ I work closely with onshore management, ensuring open communication and shared goals. Motivate with Meaning š„ I keep the team motivated by celebrating wins and emphasizing our contributions to the product's success. Organize Efficiently š§š» Tasks are assigned based on skill sets, and we ensure everyone is contributing to their strengths. Detail-Oriented Leadership š§ As a leader, I keep an eye on every detail and ensure quality is never compromised. Determined Action šÆ Iām committed to expanding our team, securing more projects, and creating long-term success. š¬ Whatās your leadership strategy? Share your thoughts, and letās connect! #Leadership #ClientEngagement #OnshoreCollaboration #TrustBuilding #QA
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
šØ š¦š¶ššš®šš¶š¼š»-šš®šš²š± š¤šš²ššš¶š¼š»: šš» š®š» šš“š¶š¹š² š²š»šš¶šæš¼š»šŗš²š»š, šµš¼š š±š¼ šš¼š šµš®š»š±š¹š² š±š¼ššÆšš š¼šæ š¾šš²ššš¶š¼š»š š®šÆš¼šš šš¼ššæ š½šæš¼š·š²š°š? šØ If your Agile team has unanswered questions and uncertainties, youāre not alone. The difference between chaos and success lies in how you handle those doubts early on. As a QA Lead, I've seen firsthand how addressing questions the right way transforms confusion into clarity. Hereās my personal experience on how to keep your team aligned and on track: 1. šš®š¶š¹š š¦šš®š»š±-šØš½š: Raise doubts daily to keep the team aligned and avoid roadblocks. 2. š¢š½š²š» šš¼šŗšŗšš»š¶š°š®šš¶š¼š»: Use Slack or project tools to address questions as soon as they arise. 3. š„š²ššæš¼šš½š²š°šš¶šš²š: Use retros to tackle lingering doubts and improve team clarity. 4. š£š®š¶šæ š£šæš¼š“šæš®šŗšŗš¶š»š“ & š£š²š²šæ š„š²šš¶š²šš: Collaborate with teammates to resolve doubts quickly and strengthen teamwork. 5. šš¼š°ššŗš²š»šš®šš¶š¼š» & šš»š¼šš¹š²š±š“š² š¦šµš®šæš¶š»š“: Keep shared docs handy to save time and answer common questions. 6. šš»šš¼š¹šš² ššµš² š£šæš¼š±šš°š š¢šš»š²šæ: Clarify requirements early with the Product Owner to prevent confusion. 7. šš“š¶š¹š² šš¼š®š°šµš²š/š¦š°šæššŗ š š®ššš²šæš: Rely on them to resolve doubts and keep the team on track. 8. šš¼š»šš¶š»šš¼šš šš²š®šæš»š¶š»š“: Encourage learning to adapt and improve constantly. 9. šš®š°šøš¹š¼š“ ššæš¼š¼šŗš¶š»š“ š¦š²ššš¶š¼š»š: Clear up future tasks and doubts during regular refinement meetings. 10. ššæš¼šš-š³šš»š°šš¶š¼š»š®š¹ šš¼šŗšŗšš»š¶š°š®šš¶š¼š»: Foster collaboration across teams to prevent misunderstandings. 11. š„š¶ššø š š®š»š®š“š²šŗš²š»š šš¶šš°šššš¶š¼š»š: Raise risks early to avoid future issues. 12. šššš¼šŗš®šš¶š¼š» šš²š²š±šÆš®š°šø šš¼š¼š½š: Establish regular reviews of automated processes for continuous improvement. In Agile, š±š¼ššÆšš arenāt problems, theyāre š¼š½š½š¼šæššš»š¶šš¶š²š š³š¼šæ š°š¹š®šæš¶šš. Handling them well š±š²š³š¶š»š²š š¼ššæ ššš°š°š²šš. š” To my fellow testers: Speak up in stand-ups, retros, or while pairing. Agile isnāt about having all the answers, itās about finding them together. Let me know how you šµš®š»š±š¹š² š¾šš²ššš¶š¼š»š š¶š» šš“š¶š¹š². Letās keep the conversation going. š #Agile #QA #Testing #Teamwork #ContinuousImprovement #Collaboration #Leadership
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
š¤ Building a Culture of Open Communication in QA š ļø In the world of Quality Assurance, open communication and transparency arenāt just nice-to-havesātheyāre essential for delivering exceptional results. When everyone from testers to developers to stakeholders is aligned, the entire process becomes more efficient and effective. Hereās how you can foster this culture within your QA process: š Define Clear Objectives: Ensure every team member knows the goals and purpose of the testing efforts. š Encourage Feedback Loops: Regular retrospectives help identify roadblocks and celebrate wins. š Share Progress Transparently: Use dashboards and reports to keep everyone informed of testing status. š Value Every Voice: Create an environment where team members feel safe to share ideas, concerns, and observations. š¢ Promote Cross-Functional Communication: Break silos between QA, development, and management. Transparency not only builds trust but also elevates the quality of the final product. By creating an open, collaborative environment, you empower your team to deliver their best work every time. š” How do you ensure transparency in your QA process? Share your thoughts below! #SoftwareTesting #QualityAssurance #Teamwork #Leadership #Transparency
To view or add a comment, sign in
-