Ever wonder why companies don’t include the survey methodology in a press release? Simple. The majority of the time the survey is flawed and they don’t want to disclose that to the public. It’s highly likely they went with a cheap survey company and didn’t realize they made a bad decision until after the survey was completed. At that point they had a choice - do nothing with the results or release the flawed results and hide the “source” (typically defined in the press release as a “independent third party research firm” and not the actual name of the market research firm which SHOULD ADD validity). Hiding the name of the market research firm that conducted the survey is a clear indicator the results likely have errors. I feel like Roz from Monsters Inc. “I’m watching you. Always watching. Always.” PS - if you have a different reason why the methodology isn’t included or the name of the market research firm isn’t in the #PR or #marketing materials you might have worked with I would love to hear why! PPS - Roz was voiced by Pixar story artist Bob Peterson! I never knew it wasn’t a grandma until today! 😂
Do you think if the public demands it, there would be improvements?
THIS. I'm always skeptical about a survey that isn't transparent about is methodology, and whether the results are to be trusted! Was the sample size statistically viable? Who was polled? Are they actually able to provide relevant responses to the questions? Etc.
Number of responses and confidence level
Founder & CEO, Writing For Humans™ | Public Relations | AI Content Editing | Content Strategy | Content Creation | ex-Edelman, ex-Ruder Finn
10mo"Figures often beguile me," Mark Twain wrote, "particularly when I have the arranging of them myself; in which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: 'There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics. '"