Alisar Mustafa’s Post

David Kim authored an article for the May 2024 ACC St. Louis newsletter exploring the legal gray area surrounding the use of #generativeAI in art and its impact on copyright law and fair use matters. David says artists have long appropriated and remixed pre-existing works to shape their artistic expression. The use of generative AI systems, which are known to create content by learning from massive datasets of copyrighted material, presents complex challenges and legal uncertainty. With the rise of generative AI, and recent challenges to legal precedents set by artists like Jeff Koons, Richard Prince and Andy Warhol, David underscores the need for clients using generative AI to understand the risks and avoid infringement. Learn more: https://lnkd.in/guDPQ3Ed #ArtificialIntelligence #CopyrightLaw #IntellectualProperty #StinsonInSTL

Elisa Shupe secures limited copyright for her AI-assisted book, raising critical questions about the future of authorship, creativity, and intellectual property in the age of generative AI. https://lnkd.in/g6FueuFE #IPLaw #Coprights #AI #GenerativeAI

Elisa Shupe secures limited copyright for her AI-assisted book, raising critical questions about the future of authorship, creativity, and intellectual property in the age of generative AI. https://lnkd.in/g7qdPqNr #IPLaw #Coprights #AI #GenerativeAI

Elisa Shupe secures limited copyright for her AI-assisted book, raising critical questions about the future of authorship, creativity, and intellectual property in the age of generative AI. https://lnkd.in/gXUhidbc #IPLaw #Coprights #AI #GenerativeAI

Curious Thoughts on prompting in AI IP. Thanks for sharing Stanislav Meerson 00:00 Prompts used for AI content generation may not be eligible for copyright protection, but a long and creative prompt could potentially be protected, and the question of copyright protection lies in the prompt itself or the output of the AI. 01:36 AI-generated works may be eligible for copyright registration, but it depends on the specific prompt and resulting output. 01:54 Copyright office is evaluating and addressing a wide variety of issues related to generative AI and prompt engineering. 02:25 The output of generative AI may contain aspects of derivativeness, raising questions about identifying human authorship. 03:12 Copyright protection for prompts used in generative AI may be possible if they are sufficiently creative and complex. #copysight #GenAI #IP #copytightable #notcopyrightable

On January 29, 2025 the United States Copyright Office released part 2 of its report relating to copyright and generative artificial inteligence. The report focuses on defining the copyrightability of work created using generative AI. Such works are eligible for copyright in instances where human authorship has "determined sufficient expressive elements". Read the full report here: https://hubs.ly/Q034JDZ90

AI Fair Use in Focus: Copyright Office Tackles AI Training with Copyrighted Works #FairUse #AI #CopyrightLaw #IPLaw The U.S. Copyright Office's upcoming report will address the complex issue of fair use in training AI models with copyrighted material, as revealed by Director Shira Perlmutter during a Senate oversight panel. This development is crucial for IP practitioners and businesses leveraging AI, as it could reshape how copyrighted content is used in machine learning and set new legal precedents. #ArtificialIntelligence #LegalUpdate #Infringement

If you want to learn more about the legal implications of the intersection of Generative AI and intellectual property, we have you covered with Part 2 of our in-depth series: Generative AI and Intellectual Property II: Copyright Implications for AI Inputs and Outputs. https://lnkd.in/eRvzDJ_Q In this IAPP - International Association of Privacy Professionals article, Brenda Leong, Ekene Chuks-Okeke, and Natalie Linero continue their discussion on applying the fair use doctrine to emerging GenAI technologies through recent cases and the court’s interpretation by exploring: 🔍The fair use analysis in terms of copyrighted materials used to train AI 🔍Copyright infringement and lawsuits against GenAI companies 🔍Copyright authorship for AI-generated works Make sure to read Part 1 of this series, available here https://lnkd.in/eVk5NPeu. Stay tuned for more insights on rising legal issues in the AI space from our experts at Luminos.Law. #IntellectualProperty #Copyright #GenerativeAI #AI #FairUsedoctrine #ailaw #responsibleai #aigovernance

Do the potential IP implications of generative AI make your head spin? You're not alone! That's why I've decided to start sending a new monthly newsletter in January on exactly this topic. Each month I'll send out an update on IP and AI with news from around the world. If you're interested in joining the conversation...check out this link: https://lnkd.in/eyU_6_7n

Prof Dr Tim W. Dornis, one of the two authors of the highly regarded study "Copyright law & training of generative AI – technological and legal foundations" (September 2024), just published ‘Generative AI, reproductions inside the model, and the making available to the public’.  https://lnkd.in/eUm-sHkE #aioffice