Christine Carr

Last week, I had the pleasure of moderating a discussion on navigating FOAK in climate tech at the Greentown Labs Summit in Boston (which had >600 people!!). Here’s a quick rundown of what was shared by Katherine St. James of Spring Lane Capital, Paris Smalls, PhD of Eden GeoPower, and Hannah Friedman of Planeteer Capital: 🌱 What is the definition of FOAK? We discussed how the term can be controversial - it's almost too general because it doesn't identify what kind of "First" FOAK refers to - first team project? First geography? First of a technology in a sector? First time for the integration of a system? It's also too specific because it has the word "first" in it, which can be anathema to later stage / project finance investors. 💰 Partnerships for Funding FOAK Projects We discussed how important it is to build a blended capital stack & use off-balance sheet capital for a project so you're not using the most expensive equity dollars to fund an infrastructure project with low-ish IRR. We also talked through being creative about using corporate partners to provide in-kind services or ink some agreement (at least an LOI) to attract this funding. 🏛 Role of Government We talked about how government capital is seen by investors & how it can be catalytic for FOAK. Government capital can provide validation that a startup has passed a rigorous diligence process by a third party - and incentives like grants or credits can help improve returns for the first project- but it's important to be doing this in conjunction with getting customer validation and to be able to present line of sight to competitive economics without concessionary capital. 👥 Advice for FOAK startups The panelists offered some very specific pieces of advice for startups going through FOAK: how to get creative with things like revenue sharing agreements or convertible notes, getting smart with project development early on (like with DeveloperU), being careful about using FOAK too liberally with certain investor groups, getting the right commercialization / FOAK talent in and around you early Huge thanks to the panelists and the team at Greentown Labs (Jill Kirkpatrick, Julia Travaglini, Aisling Carlson, etc you rocked it!!) for hosting this discussion on bridging the FOAK gap. Also immensely enjoyed the rest of the agenda. Check out the full recap & videos here: https://lnkd.in/d9ApYe9Y #ClimateTech #FOAK #ClimateFinance #ProjectDevelopment #GreenTech #CleanEnergy

55

5 Comments

A SAFE and convertible note had a baby and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati was the midwife- out popped the D-SAFE! 👶🏽🎉 A new #climatetech funding instrument was announced by Elemental Excelerator last week. One of the company’s main goals is to support smaller, up and coming companies during the awkward “Scale Gap” phase between #VC funding and natural growth. It’s called the #DSAFE (Development Simple Agreement for Future Equity) and it aims to aid the process by giving companies a small amount of cash to overcome initial risks and expenses during the developmental stages of a product launch or company. How does it work? D-SAFE has a redemption clause meaning companies can choose to have their payments offered as a loan or convert to equity at the investor’s discretion. Funders and companies will have clear communication and expectations about where the money is going and how it will be applied to either the company or the projects at hand. Financiers and companies will work together with more #transparency, and that’s a great boon for #startups and VC alike. As of this month, Elemental has already invested using D-SAFE in eight different companies, including Dimensional Energy and Origen — both companies investing in innovative and out-of-the-box solutions to environmental issues! Seems like a win-win on the surface. What do you all think about the D-SAFE? Alfredo Coppola Momoka Ueda Tim Wagner Stephen D. Torres Olya Irzak Natsuho Toyama Noriya Tarutani Shin Ogawa

15

6 Comments

🌍 Exciting news! Apparel Impact Institute (Aii) has just announced the newest round of Climate Solutions Portfolio (CSP) grants, part of the $250 million Fashion Climate Fund aimed at unlocking $2 billion in blended capital for industry-wide decarbonization. These grants provide essential funding and support for scalable, science-based solutions that help the fashion industry reduce its environmental impact.🌱 This round of grantees – Pozzi, Grant Thornton, and Amphico – are tackling unique supply chain challenges with innovative technologies, offering measurable greenhouse gas reductions. Collectively, these projects have the potential to save over 24,000 tCO2e within their first year of implementation! 💡 Highlights include: * Pozzi's advanced heat recovery system for the textile wet processing sector * Grant Thornton's innovative approach to energy conservation in the lubricant industry * Amphico's cutting-edge color-mixing technology for textiles, creating vibrant fabrics with reduced environmental impact A huge congratulations to these trailblazers for their commitment to a sustainable future. Learn more about their projects and how Aii is driving decarbonization efforts across the industry #Sustainability #ClimateAction #Decarbonization #FashionIndustry #ApparelImpactInstitute #InnovationForImpact #CSPGrantees #SustainableFashion #Decarbonization

63

Very excited to be digging further into how we can accelerate the scaling of our decarbonization efforts with data insights from our past (cleantech 1.0) with Caleb Cunningham and Deanna Zhang! See our latest post in our series below. We are looking forward to collaborating with anyone else interested in these topics.

25

#𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐆𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫 ✨ Congrats Notpla on the raise! Notpla is on a mission to replace over 100 million+ single-use plastic per year with seaweed tech & innovation. 🌱 Since 2014, Notpla's team has been reimagining packaging from nature's perspective -- bringing truly sustainable packaging alternatives for food, drinks, and many other daily use items, using revolutionary materials made of seaweed and plants, Notpla's packaging are edible / biodegradable within days. 😯 🌊 What's more - growing demands for seaweed is regenerative in that seaweed forests are biodiverse, and can filter out pollution from human activities. The more we grow of it, the better the effect for our planet! 🌎 #RegenerativeBusiness #Sustainability

1

Check out my recent post on why President Trump is the forcing function for us to solve the “Missing Middle” and catch the industrial Tsunami of onshoring coming to the US!

84

9 Comments

It has been a week of climate at The Drop and another incredible one coming up with NY climate week! Another topic that's close to my heart: Spotlight on #femalefounders: There's been a recent decline in the aggregate number of female startup founders (down almost 2% in 2023), one of the lowest % in recent years. While this decline affects many traditionally active sectors (education, consumer, biotech, and SaaS), FemTech is a notable exception - with a 1000% increase in startups over the past decade. Still, in 2023 - only 1.4% of capital invested went to #FemTech, many citing the "ick" factor. To add salt, male-led FemTech startups have historically secured more funding than female-led ones. Many have written on this, including Cindy Gallop 👏🏻. This is a largely untapped and underfunded market - some argue the "Femtech Revolution" will exceed $103 bil. by 2030. I'm excited to see more funds with female partners executing deals - which will naturally #growthepie and increase the capital flowing to female founders. The #formula is simple: Female investors + female founder expertise puts us in solid position to solve the many issues that disproportionately affect women - from #healthcare, #FinTech and #sustainability. ⭐️I'm proud to work with the fantastic team at Emmeline Ventures - and if you haven’t heard: they are doubling down on this focused thesis. 👀 #WomenInTech #VentureCapital #Investing

20

Excellent blog post on the realities of Climate & VC. While these are "tough times for the transition," there are also many opportunities. Significant capital will continue to flow, with Corporate VCs playing a larger role in financing this transition. Through this process, they will strengthen their LP positions in funds tackling climate challenges. I receive weekly calls from large Holding & Corporate VCs seeking introductions to Climate / Energy / Infra VC Funds. When I ask about their target sub-verticals within Climate / Energy, they often mention that they default to focusing on specific regions due to limited resources and coverage. In other words, rather than evaluating whether a DACH VC is better positioned for solar or grid-tech compared to a Nordic or US VC, they simply pursue whichever regions they can access—a haphazard approach at best. I always advise LPs to evaluate VCs within their operating market context. Since sourcing is crucial in venture capital, Holding Cos. and Family Offices should carefully assess a VC's location, regulatory context, and market environment before investing and building a portfolio of Funds. I've heard "I wish I had discovered this VC / region sooner" far too many times... * At ComposeVC's Built World Fund, we do not invest in Climatetech or Energytech directly, only as it relates to our Built World thesis.

9

Sometimes I just become despondent with how people think about CO2. Although I welcome the good intentions of "leveling the playing field" for CO2 removal, IMO this VERY lucrative newly introduce Bennet & Murkowski bill would suck all the oxygen out of the room for many/most nature-based solutions which are the one class of options that have real affordably scalable potential. Unwittingly, my first reaction to this proposal is it will make the silly things so lucrative that the real things can never happen. Although it has several "issues" upon my first read, first and foremost is the 1000+ year "permanence" - a well-intended and seemingly obvious but misguided goal IMO. Those that follow me have heard it before, but at some point we must get it of our mind that the goal should be to lock up mean, evil carbon away forever in a deep dark vault like gold in Fort Knox, and replace it with the goal of accumulating more and more carbon as it is put to work in enabling all life on Earth. Let me state it clearly again - permanence of a molecule is actually the wrong goal. Not that it works this way (even in the inhaling and exhaling of life), but if all CO2 left its storage every night and returned each morning, it would be no different than if it stayed inside all night. Actually staying put doesn't matter. What matters right now is that we shift the total balance from the atmosphere to the lithosphere and biosphere - the latter meaning all life. I wish I could keep my attention on just helping real carbon removal happen instead of thinking about how I might game such a system, but here we are... I sometimes feel like Don Quixote, but I sleep well knowing that with physics and thermodynamics on my side, my cause is just. But IMO, we may all end up dead if we don't learn to understand this. My bigger near-term worry now is that it may just get harder for real solutions to compete with lucrative incentives for (many, but not all) fantasies. And some of these fantasies will even make the underlying problem worse (e.g. perverse incentives to remove biomass that could actually help life capture even more carbon). Ugh. h/t: David Lawrence for bringing my attention to this new bill.

40

8 Comments

Wonderful article about Emily Knight and the whole The Engine Accelerator team on the amazing work their doing changing the world with #ToughTech!

28

Listened to Bloomberg’s Zero: The Climate Race recently—worth a listen for anyone in the climate tech space. Akshat Rathi interviews Eric Toone from Breakthrough Energy Ventures. Key topics: ⚡️ Carbon removal ⚡️ Grid modernization ⚡️ Nuclear fusion and fission ⚡️ Green hydrogen—the hype, promise vs reality Good insights on where innovation is heading in sustainability and energy. #ClimateTech #Sustainability #Energy #Innovation

9

2 Comments

That feeling when you watch the macro forces that undergird your Industrial Transformation & Supply Chain Technology investment thesis at ⁦‪REFASHIOND Ventures: The Industrial Transformation Fund unfolding every single day: Escalating Geopolitical Tensions; The Climate Crisis & Severe Weather; Consumer Behavior & Demographics. At most venture capital firms, Industrial Transformation & Supply Chain Technology is a tiny, emerging “area of interest” . . . At REFASHIOND Ventures, it’s our entire world. Join us. #IndustrialTransformation #SupplyChain #Innovation #Technology #Startups #VentureCapital

5

Data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) illustrates the current "readiness" of #ClimateTechs + their potential impact on carbon reduction. As shown, many techs are at an early stage of being able to have a material impact. Concerningly, some tech funds recently returned capital back to investors recently + closed their funds - citing inability to fund capital intensive techs, found in areas like ClimateTech. This in part may be contributing to the $2 trillion shortfall in ClimateTech, that Deloitte estimates. What this may mean for the future? - The migration of LPs to global, super VC funds within ClimateTech, given the large capital pools needed to fund tech development - Greater specialization from smaller funds, energizing more niche elements of the ClimateTech market - but also altering their / LP's risk profile - A greater role to be played by debt financing in funding growth entities at an earlier stage - impacting cashflow dynamics Will be an interesting space to watch moving forward. We at The Proptech Connection are constantly working with all parts of the Proptech ecosystem. From the leading LPs, funds, techs and adopters in market, providing an independent view. Reach out to us today to find out how we can help. #InvestorTrends #Strategy #Global Ivo van Breukelen Stuart Daun Kiki C. Ethan Ward

9

2 Comments

Massachusetts in 2024 is home to the most climate tech startups per capita in the country. They thrive at institutions like MIT and Greentown Labs, turning big ideas into tangible solutions. But we struggle to keep them here. States from coast to coast are wooing away entrepreneurs and employers. These places facilitate demonstration programs, connect companies to trained workers, and provide access to real estate for manufacturing. The Mass Leads Act rebalances these incentives, directing capital investments and tax benefits that keep these innovators in Boston for the long term and encourages others to join them. #climatetech #climateVC #venturecapital

5

At a time of such political uncertainty, an urgent reminder that climate-tech is a matter of national security and industrial development strategy. Without any reference to carbon or climate-change, the energy transition is a race the US and the west cannot afford to lose. Technology transitions fuel the economic and military power that shape geopolitics and the rise and fall of empires. Think: Caravel ship design and new navigation tools that underpinned Portuguese conquests of Africa and the Americas. The 1st industrial revolution fueling the rail roads, manufacturing that built the British empire. Then the US-lead second industrial revolution with oil, cars, and the economic boom associated with these. Ascendent after WWI, the US eclipsed Britain and Europe as in WWII on the back of its economic might and technology leadership. But the best analogy for the critical strategic, economic and technological importance of winning the clean energy race is microprocessor chips. In the 1950s through 70s, America’s ingenuity and capital markets seeded these technologies that changed everything, not just computers, the internet communications, but smart bombs, intelligence, satellites in the midst of the cold war. Japan and Korea’s economic miracles were tied directly to economic development policies focusing on these industries. And today, China’s claims on Taiwan are more about controlling TSMC’s chip manufacturing technology than national identity. Lets be clear. Clean energy technology is the next wave of technology that will shape this century and those that win this tech will control the economic and geopolitical order of the future. China saw this 20 years ago and has invested billions to ensure it wins the race. Today, China controls ~75% of global battery manufacturing capacity, 80 % of solar panel capacity, 58% of EVs manufactured, and 60% of the critical minerals that feed these industries. Beyond economic power, climate-technologies will also decide the future of hot and cold conflict. Think: grid resilient military bases powered by distributed energy at a time of cyber attacks on the grid.  Electric tactical vehicles with no noise signature. Battlefield batteries replacing highly exposed fuel supply chains. This isn’t speculation, this is straight from the US militaries climate-change strategy. China understands that clean energy is the inevitable future, and he who captures this prize wins the 21st century. They are cheaper, easier to deploy, with exponentially falling costs, and myriad use-case superiorities that make the obsolescence of fossil fuels inevitable. Today, 90% of all new generation capacity being added globally is renewable. We reached peak ICE vehicle in 2017. At a time when climate has become a partisan political issue, lets reframe this topic as the urgent matter of global security it is. The future of clean energy is not open to debate. But who wins this prize and, with it, the next century, is up to us.

24

2 Comments

In the work I do at Earth Finance, I see everyday that the large companies, with complex value chains and net zero strategies, require and rely on innovative technologies to achieve their goals. Being able to meet their need is vital not only to their success, but also for an emerging technology startup’s success. In this episode (our third which I think officially makes this a series 🤠), we talk basics of securing the business and trust of a large customer when they take a chance on your new tech and aim to scale it across their business.

37

3 Comments

It is clear that there is a ripple effect of good that occurs when we invest in #CleanEnergy. Shoutout to the programs, startups, and organizations that allow us to prioritize #ImpactInvesting. They have significantly boosted investment in clean energy. Check out this World Economic Forum article for more information. #Sustainability

6

Is SF Climate Week banter a good barometer of the macro climate tech investment mood? Key nuggets to ponder: 💰💰💰 Climate solutions (like most science/engineering and hardware based deep tech) are capital intensive. They require an "all of the above", creative financing approach to obtain the capital needed to scale (from CVCs, government, public-private partnerships, green banks, debt financing...). 🤖 AI - Everything, Everywhere (all at once). As in most sectors, AI is white hot. It can be a key component of climate solutions, but also a demand accelerant ⏩ More AI = ↗ compute and power demand ⚡= ↗ need for energy storage and grid enhancing solutions 🔋. 🏛 🤵 Political Angst. Real worry that a new administration will cut or impede climate tech catalyzing funding (e.g., DOE funding from IRA). #climatetech #climateweek

4

2 Comments

Are electric vehicles as green as we think? I recently joined the 'ESG Detectives' podcast to discuss the true environmental impact of EVs, from manufacturing to energy consumption. We also explored the vital role of AI and semiconductors in shaping the future of sustainable transportation. Tune in to discover the surprising realities behind this rapidly evolving industry. What are your thoughts on the environmental impact of EVs? Share in the comments below! #EV #AI #Sustainability #GreenTech #Podcast #Discussion

20