प्रसिद्ध हार्वर्ड प्रतीक विज्ञानी रॉबर्ट लैंग्डन, अपने गुरु के अपहरण के बाद खुद को घातक पहेलियों की एक श्रृंखला में उलझा हुआ पाता है. सीआईए उसे एक टास्क फोर्स में शामिल करती है जहां वह एक द्... सभी पढ़ेंप्रसिद्ध हार्वर्ड प्रतीक विज्ञानी रॉबर्ट लैंग्डन, अपने गुरु के अपहरण के बाद खुद को घातक पहेलियों की एक श्रृंखला में उलझा हुआ पाता है. सीआईए उसे एक टास्क फोर्स में शामिल करती है जहां वह एक द्रुतशीतन साजिश का खुलासा करता है.प्रसिद्ध हार्वर्ड प्रतीक विज्ञानी रॉबर्ट लैंग्डन, अपने गुरु के अपहरण के बाद खुद को घातक पहेलियों की एक श्रृंखला में उलझा हुआ पाता है. सीआईए उसे एक टास्क फोर्स में शामिल करती है जहां वह एक द्रुतशीतन साजिश का खुलासा करता है.
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I've read all of the books, and all but Origins more than once. Yes, the books are fast paced, as are the movies made so far. It's refreshing that they've slowed it down a bit. The decision to have a younger Langdon works for me as it gives us the opportunity to see him at a time where he's still learning, that he doesn't have all the answers at the drop of a hat. Every profession requires time to "catch on". I personally don't see a political agenda. That's usually for those that are looking for one or complain because something doesn't align with THEIR beliefs, aka confirmation bias.
It's a work of fiction with some factual information and places thrown in ; some of them even tweaked to tell a fictional story.
What makes me laugh are those who do not like the books but they still watch the show and the movies. WHY????. Oh, just to have something to get on the ole soapbox and whine and cry about it. I get it if you love the book but not the show (Ive felt that way about many Stephen King adaptations) but, come on.
It's a work of fiction with some factual information and places thrown in ; some of them even tweaked to tell a fictional story.
What makes me laugh are those who do not like the books but they still watch the show and the movies. WHY????. Oh, just to have something to get on the ole soapbox and whine and cry about it. I get it if you love the book but not the show (Ive felt that way about many Stephen King adaptations) but, come on.
The thing about dan browns books is the pacing . This attempt to do something with Dan Browns world of mysteries and symbolism in a 1 hour show gives us a cheap feeling unrealistic bore .
I would watch this if you like MacGyver , or Relic Hunter et al.
Think of when you popular premium clothing brands end up being sold at walmart . Get my drift.
I would watch this if you like MacGyver , or Relic Hunter et al.
Think of when you popular premium clothing brands end up being sold at walmart . Get my drift.
You haven't read the book then it's fine for what it is. If you like mystery and a bit of adventure then you should watch it. The acting is fine, the story is good and overall it's entertaining.
But if you have read the books, going by other reviews I guess, you shouldn't watch it. Or maybe you should and make up your own mind.
But if you have read the books, going by other reviews I guess, you shouldn't watch it. Or maybe you should and make up your own mind.
I love Dan Brown books & I really wanted to like The Lost Symbol. I have been anxiously waiting for it to come out. It turned out to be a disappointment. I tried - I watched every painful episode. The casting was terrible. No one was meant to play the roles they did. Tom Hanks was a bad Robert Langdon and Zuckerman was worse. Landon is written as this middle-aged, James Bond, good-looking, smooth-talking, smart, sexy ladies man that turns a nerdy profession into something cool. They keep casting these boring, average-looking guys to play him and give them none of that appeal. The acting was bad - from everyone - because the writing was bad. The script was drawn out in places it should have been sped up and rushed in places it should have gone slower. The ending was so rushed it didn't make sense - after drawing out 9 previous episodes. It wasn't terrible, but it wasn't good either. Certainly not worth 10 hours of my time.
It's almost offensive how bad the acting is. These actors are giving us the least amount of effort possible. I feel like I'm watching a high school play where I suppose we should just be amazed they memorized the lines. Zero chemistry between actors. Zero suspense. Scenes are shot like absolutely no attempt was made to elicit an emotional response from viewers. Bland. Formulaic. Predictable. Saved By The Bell demonstrated more gripping storylines. If you enjoy this show, good, I'm glad you get something out of it. But I'm terribly sorry that you need your mysteries spoon fed to you by a D-Grade cast and crew who are completely out of their depth.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाBased on 'The Lost Symbol', Dan Brown's third book in his Robert Langdon series. Sony planned to adapt the book as the third movie in the movie franchise early in the 2010s, following The Da Vinci Code (2006) and Angels & Demons (2009). However, production of that adaptation became too complicated as Ron Howard preferred to only produce it rather than directing, and Tom Hanks would not be returning as Professor Robert Langdon. In the end, the production took so long that the novel 'Inferno' was released in 2013, and Sony decided to skip 'The Lost Symbol' and make Inferno (2016) instead, for which most of the crew of the previous films returned, including Howard as director and Hanks as the main character. Because the series is a prequel to the movies, Hanks was replaced as the younger Langdon with Ashley Zukerman, but Brown, Howard and franchise producer Brian Grazer have remained on board as executive producers.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does The Lost Symbol have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Dan Brown's the Lost Symbol
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
