Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn 1926, with her personal life in tatters and her writing in crisis, a young Agatha Christie decides to solve a real-life murder.In 1926, with her personal life in tatters and her writing in crisis, a young Agatha Christie decides to solve a real-life murder.In 1926, with her personal life in tatters and her writing in crisis, a young Agatha Christie decides to solve a real-life murder.
- Rosalind
- (as Amelia Rose Dell)
- Franklin
- (as Joshua Silver)
Avis en vedette
The cast is terrific, with Ruth Bradley especially notable in the nuanced range she demonstrates as Agatha - though that's hardly to count out anyone else involved, for they're all just as swell. While the narrative Dalton has whipped up is solid generally, I think it is a tad on the light side, and maybe a bit direct; on the other hand, the resolution of the plot is delightful. Meanwhile, the little details that round out that story are splendid, with strong dialogue and characters above all, and sturdy scene writing. I admire Loane's direction, giving that screenplay form, and the crew also put in fine work - production design, art direction, costume design, Damien Elliott's cinematography.
I mean it as no offense to anyone involved when I say that this feels less like a mystery one can meaningfully sink their teeth into, and more like a flavorful whimsy to enjoy in passing. This is, after all, a TV movie. This is no inherent mark against it however, and it's plentifully enjoyable - that is, it's all it needs to be. Those seeking the most complex and absorbing of titles may find themselves disappointed, while anyone just broadly looking for something entertaining will feel right at home. As if to emphasize the point, I find it difficult to speak at greater length about this film, for there's not an especial amount of depth to it. Suffice to say that 'Agatha and the truth of murder' isn't necessarily a must-see, but if you have the chance to watch, it's a pleasant way to spend 90 minutes.
I confess I was a little unsure about the premise of putting a real person in an obviously fictional situation... but surprisingly it really works if you can suspend your disbelief somewhat. The story nicely combines known facts about her life at the time with an interesting fiction. The mystery she investigates has the feel of one of her stories, perhaps somewhat helped by the way the time period is captured. There are a good number of suspects, each with their own motives, as well as one or two red herrings. The cast are really good; most notably Ruth Bradley as Agatha Christie, Pippa Haywood, as the woman who brought the mystery to her and Tim McInnerny as one of the suspects. As stated before it is necessary to suspends one's disbelief at times; noticeably towards the end when a local policeman recognises our protagonist but does tell the authorities despite it being made clear that there is a nationwide manhunt for her. Overall though this was a fine murder mystery that could easily have come from the pen of the great women herself.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAgatha uses the under cover name of Mary Westmacott in the drama. The real Agatha Christie published 6 novels under this name between 1930 and 1956: The Rose and the Yew Tree, the Burden, Absent in the Spring, Giant's Bread, Unfinished Portrait and a Daughter's Daughter.
- GaffesThe neck-tie (dark with stripes) that Agatha wears as the legal assistant changes several times during a single scene. The knot may or may present a stripe.
- Citations
[Sir Arthur Conan Doyle has told Agatha Christie that he once suffered from writer's block and cured it by designing a golf course, and recommends that Agatha should do the same when she asks his advice because her readers are guessing the identity of the culprits in her books. She consults Sir Hugh Persimmion, an expert on golf course design]
Agatha Christie: I want to design a golf course.
Sir Hugh Persimmion: I see. Really?
Agatha Christie: Yes.
Sir Hugh Persimmion: Well, in that case, I'm afraid my answer's quite short. You can't.
Agatha Christie: Excuse me?
Sir Hugh Persimmion: [patronisingly] There isn't a golf club I know that would commission a design from a woman. I understand there has been a trend of late for ladies to golf. But really, the sheer complexity of a designer's task is beyond the capabilities of a woman. No matter how capable that woman is.
Agatha Christie: [smiling ingratiatingly] I see. I hadn't realised. But thinking about it, how could I have been so stupid? Imagine a woman being able to design the preamble to putting something small in a hole. A woman might just present the hole and have done. And where would be the fun in that? There'd be nothing to groom, for a start.
[she stands up]
Agatha Christie: [still smiling sweetly] Thank you for your time. It's been pointless.
[Sir Hugh looks nonplussed as he realises that Agatha's charming "climbdown" and farewell were actually intended to be highly insulting - and highly suggestive as well]
- Générique farfeluDisclaimer in end credits: "This film has not been endorsed, licensed or authorised by the estate of Agatha Christie or by Agatha Christie Limited."
- ConnexionsFollowed by Agatha and the Curse of Ishtar (2019)
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- 阿嘉莎與謀殺的真相
- Lieux de tournage
- Grey Abbey, Newtownards, Royaume-Uni (RU)(Country House)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 77 542 $ US
Contribuer à cette page
