What's The Difference Between git reset --mixed, --soft, and --hard?
Last Updated :
12 Jun, 2024
Git is an important tool for version control in software development. Among its numerous commands, git reset is one of the most powerful but also one of the most complex, especially with its different options: --mixed, --soft, and --hard. This article explains these options, their syntax, features, and uses, and provides practical examples to help you understand their differences and use cases.
Introduction
git reset is a command that undoes changes by moving the HEAD (the current branch reference) to a specified commit. It can affect the staging area (index), the working directory, or both, depending on the option used. The three primary modes of git reset—--mixed, --soft, and --hard—determine how the reset operation impacts these areas.
Overview of git reset
- git reset --mixed: Resets the HEAD and updates the staging area, but leaves the working directory unchanged.
- git reset --soft: Only resets the HEAD, leaving both the staging area and the working directory unchanged.
- git reset --hard: Resets the HEAD, updates the staging area, and resets the working directory to match the specified commit.
Let's dive into each of these modes in more detail.
1. git reset --mixed
Syntax
git reset --mixed <commit>
Uses of git reset --mixed
- Default Mode: If no option is provided, git reset defaults to --mixed.
- Updates Staging Area: Changes the staging area to match the specified commit, effectively un-staging files that were previously staged.
- Preserves Working Directory: Leaves the working directory unchanged, so any modifications remain in your files.
Example
Consider you have a commit history like this:
A -- B -- C (HEAD)
Running the following command:
git reset --mixed B
The result is:
- HEAD points to commit B.
- Staging area matches commit B.
- Working directory contains changes from commit C as un-staged modifications.
Use Case
Use --mixed when you want to keep your working changes but remove them from the staging area. This is useful if you realize the changes should not be staged yet but you still want to continue working on them.
2. git reset --soft
Syntax
git reset --soft <commit>
Uses of git reset --soft
- Updates HEAD Only: Moves HEAD to the specified commit without affecting the staging area or working directory.
- Preserves Staging Area: Keeps changes in the staging area.
- Preserves Working Directory: Leaves the working directory unchanged.
Example
Given a commit history like this:
A -- B -- C (HEAD)
Running the command:
git reset --soft B
The result is:
- HEAD points to commit B.
- Staging area retains changes from commit C.
- Working directory contains changes from commit C.
Use Case
Use --soft when you want to adjust the commit history (e.g., remove the latest commit) but keep all the changes in both the staging area and the working directory, allowing you to commit them again.
3. git reset --hard
Syntax
git reset --hard <commit>
Uses of git reset --hard
- Full Reset: Resets the HEAD, staging area, and working directory to match the specified commit.
- Data Loss: Completely discards all changes in the staging area and working directory, making it impossible to recover them through Git.
- Clean State: Useful for discarding unwanted changes and restoring the repository to a known state.
Example
Given a commit history like this:
A -- B -- C (HEAD)
Running the command:
git reset --hard B
The result is:
- HEAD points to commit B.
- Staging area matches commit B.
- Working directory matches commit B.
Use Case
Use --hard when you want to completely discard any changes in the working directory and staging area and revert to a specific commit. This is often used to undo unwanted changes that are no longer needed.
Difference Between git reset --mixed, --soft, and --hard
Feature
| --mixed
| soft
| --hard
|
|---|
Resets HEAD
| Yes
| Yes
| Yes
|
|---|
Updates Staging Area
| Yes
| No
| Yes
|
|---|
Updates Working Directory
| No
| No
| Yes
|
|---|
Preserves Staged Changes
| No (un-stages changes)
| Yes
| No (discards staged changes)
|
|---|
Preserves Working Directory Changes
| Yes
| Yes
| No (discards working directory changes)
|
|---|
Conclusion
Understanding the differences between git reset --mixed, --soft, and --hard is crucial for effectively managing your Git repository. Each option serves different purposes, from keeping your working changes while un-staging them, to adjusting your commit history without affecting your files, to fully discarding all changes and resetting to a previous commit.
- Use --mixed when you need to un-stage changes but want to keep them in your working directory.
- Use --soft to keep all changes in the staging area and working directory while moving HEAD to a different commit.
- Use --hard to completely discard changes and reset everything to a specific commit.
Similar Reads
Git - Difference Between HEAD, Working Tree and Index Git, a popular version control system, helps developers track changes and collaborate on projects efficiently. To use Git effectively, it's essential to understand its key components: HEAD, the working tree, and the index (also known as the staging area). This article will explain these concepts and
4 min read
Git - Difference Between Git Revert, Checkout and Reset Git offers a range of commands to manage and manipulate your codebase. Among these commands, git revert, git checkout, and git reset are frequently used for different purposes. Understanding the differences between these commands is important for effective version control. In this article, we'll exp
6 min read
Git - Difference Between Merging and Rebasing When working with Git, two common strategies for integrating changes from different branches are merging and rebasing. Both techniques serve the purpose of combining code from multiple branches, but they do so in different ways. This article will help you understand the differences between merging a
3 min read
Difference Between Git HEAD and Main Branch In Git, understanding the roles of the HEAD and the primary branch (commonly master or main) is important for efficient version control and collaboration. These concepts, while related, serve different purposes in the management of repositories. In this article, we will explore what HEAD is and the
3 min read
Difference Between "git commit" and "git push"? Git commit and git push are two essential commands you'll use a lot when working with Git. even their frequent use together, they have different functions. In order to help you understand when and how to use these two commands effectively in your version control workflow, this article will break dow
2 min read
Difference Between Git Push Origin and Git Push Origin Master Understanding the difference between git push origin and git push origin master is important for efficient version control in Git. These commands are used to upload changes from your local repository to a remote repository, but they function differently. This article will explain these differences,
3 min read
Difference Between Git Fetch and Git Pull Understanding the difference between git fetch and git pull is important for effective version control in Git. Git Fetch and Git Pull are two important commands in Git that help in managing remote repositories. While both commands involve retrieving data from remote repositories, they serve distinct
5 min read
Difference between “git add -A†and “git add†When working with Git, the git add command is used to move changes from your working directory to the staging area. However, there are different options and flags that can be used with git add, such as -A, which might lead to some confusion. In this article, we'll explore the differences between git
2 min read
How to Reset a Git Branch to a Remote Repository? Resetting a Git branch to match a remote repository is a common task, particularly when you want to discard local changes and make your branch identical to the remote counterpart. This can be useful in scenarios where your local branch has diverged from the remote, and you want to synchronize it wit
3 min read