Star Height of Regular Expression and Regular Language Last Updated : 11 Jul, 2025 Comments Improve Suggest changes 5 Likes Like Report The star height relates to the field of theoretical computation (TOC). It is used to indicate the structural complexity of regular expressions and regular languages. In this context, complexity refers to the maximum nesting depth of Kleene stars present in a regular expression.A regular language may be represented by multiple equivalent regular expressions, each having different star heights based on their structure. However, the star height of a regular language is a unique number, representing the minimum star height among all possible regular expressions for that language.Generalized Star HeightThe generalized star height defines the minimum nesting depth of Kleene stars required to describe the language using a generalized regular expression.For example, consider the language “aba” over the alphabet set {a,b}: (a + b)^* → Star height = 1 (a^* b^*)^* → Star height = 2Since we consider the least star height, the star height of the regular language “aba” is 1.Formal Definition of Star HeightThe star height of a regular expression is formally defined as: h(\phi) = 0 , where 𝜙 represents the empty set. h(\epsilon) = 0 , where 𝜀 represents the empty string. h(t) = 0 , where t is any terminal symbol of an alphabet set. h(EF) = \max(h(E), h(F)) , where E and F are regular expressions. h(E^*) = h(E) + 1. Examples of Star Height h(a^*(ba^*)^*) = 2 h((a b^*) + ((a^* a b^*)^* b)^*) = 3 h(a) = 0 Advantages of Considering Star Height1. Complexity AnalysisProvides a measure of repetition complexity in regular expressions or languages.Helps in evaluating the efficiency of pattern matching, parsing, and automaton construction.Aids in analyzing algorithm feasibility and implementation efficiency.2. Expressive Power AssessmentHigher star height indicates a greater nesting of repetition.Helps in understanding the expressiveness of a regular expression.Useful in comparing different language structures.3. Design ConsiderationsImpacts the design of algorithms and data structures for regular expressions.Automata with low star height may use finite automata, while higher star heights may require pushdown automata.Disadvantages of Considering Star Height1. Limited to Regular LanguagesOnly applicable to regular expressions and regular languages.Cannot be directly used for context-free or context-sensitive languages.2. Overemphasis on RepetitionFocuses only on repetition complexity, missing nested structures (e.g., balancing rules, context-sensitivity).May provide an incomplete understanding of language complexity.3. Computational LimitationsDetermining star height is undecidable in general.Computational cost can be high for large or complex regular expressions.4. Star Height May Not Correlate with Real-World ApplicationsTheoretical complexity does not always match practical performance.Algorithm optimizations, input data, and domain-specific factors can influence efficiency beyond just star height. Create Quiz Comment S SaagnikAdhikary Follow 5 Improve S SaagnikAdhikary Follow 5 Improve Article Tags : Misc Theory of Computation Explore Automata _ IntroductionIntroduction to Theory of Computation5 min readChomsky Hierarchy in Theory of Computation2 min readApplications of various Automata4 min readRegular Expression and Finite AutomataIntroduction of Finite Automata3 min readArden's Theorem in Theory of Computation6 min readSolving Automata Using Arden's Theorem6 min readL-graphs and what they represent in TOC4 min readHypothesis (language regularity) and algorithm (L-graph to NFA) in TOC7 min readRegular Expressions, Regular Grammar and Regular Languages7 min readHow to identify if a language is regular or not8 min readDesigning Finite Automata from Regular Expression (Set 1)4 min readStar Height of Regular Expression and Regular Language3 min readGenerating regular expression from Finite Automata3 min readCode Implementation of Deterministic Finite Automata (Set 1)8 min readProgram for Deterministic Finite Automata7 min readDFA for Strings not ending with "THE"12 min readDFA of a string with at least two 0âs and at least two 1âs3 min readDFA for accepting the language L = { anbm | n+m =even }14 min readDFA machines accepting odd number of 0âs or/and even number of 1âs3 min readDFA of a string in which 2nd symbol from RHS is 'a'10 min readUnion Process in DFA4 min readConcatenation Process in DFA3 min readDFA in LEX code which accepts even number of zeros and even number of ones6 min readConversion from NFA to DFA5 min readMinimization of DFA7 min readReversing Deterministic Finite Automata4 min readComplementation process in DFA2 min readKleene's Theorem in TOC | Part-13 min readMealy and Moore Machines in TOC3 min readDifference Between Mealy Machine and Moore Machine4 min readCFGRelationship between grammar and language in Theory of Computation4 min readSimplifying Context Free Grammars6 min readClosure Properties of Context Free Languages11 min readUnion and Intersection of Regular languages with CFL3 min readConverting Context Free Grammar to Chomsky Normal Form5 min readConverting Context Free Grammar to Greibach Normal Form6 min readPumping Lemma in Theory of Computation4 min readCheck if the language is Context Free or Not4 min readAmbiguity in Context free Grammar and Languages3 min readOperator grammar and precedence parser in TOC6 min readContext-sensitive Grammar (CSG) and Language (CSL)2 min readPDA (Pushdown Automata)Introduction of Pushdown Automata5 min readPushdown Automata Acceptance by Final State4 min readConstruct Pushdown Automata for given languages4 min readConstruct Pushdown Automata for all length palindrome6 min readDetailed Study of PushDown Automata3 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {anbm cn | m,n>=1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {an bn cm | m,n>=1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {anbn | n>=1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {amb2m| m>=1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {am bn cp dq | m+n=p+q ; m,n,p,q>=1}2 min readConstruct Pushdown automata for L = {0n1m2m3n | m,n ⥠0}3 min readConstruct Pushdown automata for L = {0n1m2n+m | m, n ⥠0}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {ambncm+n | m,n ⥠1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {amb(m+n)cn| m,n ⥠1}3 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {a2mb3m|m>=1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {amb2m+1 | m ⥠1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {aibjckdl | i==k or j==l,i>=1,j>=1}3 min readConstruct Pushdown automata for L = {a2mc4ndnbm | m,n ⥠0}3 min readNPDA for L = {0i1j2k | i==j or j==k ; i , j , k >= 1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {anb2n| n>=1} U {anbn| n>=1}2 min readNPDA for the language L ={wÐ{a,b}* | w contains equal no. of a's and b's}3 min readTuring MachineTuring Machine in TOC7 min readTuring Machine for addition3 min readTuring machine for subtraction | Set 12 min readTuring machine for multiplication2 min readTuring machine for copying data2 min readConstruct a Turing Machine for language L = {0n1n2n | nâ¥1}3 min readConstruct a Turing Machine for language L = {wwr | w ∈ {0, 1}}5 min readConstruct a Turing Machine for language L = {ww | w ∈ {0,1}}7 min readConstruct Turing machine for L = {an bm a(n+m) | n,mâ¥1}3 min readConstruct a Turing machine for L = {aibjck | i*j = k; i, j, k ⥠1}2 min readTuring machine for 1's and 2âs complement3 min readRecursive and Recursive Enumerable Languages in TOC6 min readTuring Machine for subtraction | Set 22 min readHalting Problem in Theory of Computation4 min readTuring Machine as Comparator3 min readDecidabilityDecidable and Undecidable Problems in Theory of Computation6 min readUndecidability and Reducibility in TOC5 min readComputable and non-computable problems in TOC6 min readTOC Interview preparationLast Minute Notes - Theory of Computation13 min readTOC Quiz and PYQ's in TOCTheory of Computation - GATE CSE Previous Year Questions2 min read Like