Postman Vs Thunder Client - API Testing Tools
Last Updated :
23 Jul, 2025
When it comes to API testing, Postman and Thunder Client are the first choices for developers. Postman has a powerful set of features that can be used to create, test, and automate APIs, while Thunder Client is a lightweight, VS Code extension focused on simplicity and ease of use for quick API testing.
Postman
Postman has been a leading API testing and development tool for both individual developers and large teams. It has a lot of functionalities and a user-friendly interface, which helps in efficient API development and testing.
Features of Postman
- Comprehensive Testing Suite: Postman allows for creating complex test scripts using JavaScript for automation of testing processes.
- Collaboration Tools: Team members can collaborate using shared workspaces, collections, and environments.
- Collection Runner: You can automate multiple API requests in a sequence with customizable workflows and assertions.
- Environments and Variables: We can create different environments (e.g., development, staging, production) with variables to manage various API settings.
- Mock Servers: We can generate mock servers to simulate and test API responses without hitting the live endpoint.
- API Documentation: It can automatically generate API documentation for the collections.
Thunder Client
Thunder Client is an API client built for Visual Studio Code that offers a fast, lightweight option for API testing. Its simplicity and interactive interface make it a great choice for quick testing without leaving your IDE.
Features of Thunder Client
- VS Code Integration: Thunder Client can work within the VS Code editor directly.
- Fast and Lightweight: Thunder Client is built to be light and responsive, focusing on minimal configuration and rapid testing.
- Environment Variables: Supports creating and using environment variables to make testing flexible.
- Collections and History: Users can organize requests into collections and easily access past requests with a history feature.
- JSON Path Assertions: Supports testing responses by validating JSON data directly within the interface.
- No External Account Required: Unlike Postman, it doesn’t require users to create an account to start testing.
Differences Between Postman and Thunder Client
| Feature | Postman | Thunder Client |
|---|
| Platform | Standalone Application | VS Code Extension |
| Complex Testing Capabilities | Advanced testing with scripts, automation | Limited scripting; basic testing |
| Collaboration | Shared workspaces and real-time collaboration | Basic sharing (via export) |
| Environment and Variables | Advanced variable and environment management | Basic variable support |
| Mock Servers | Yes | No |
| User Interface | Standalone UI | Embedded in VS Code |
| Speed and Lightweight | More features, can be heavier | Fast, lightweight |
| Offline Mode | Can work offline, sync later | Fully offline |
| API Documentation | Automatic documentation generation | No built-in documentation feature |
| Cost | Free & paid plans | Free |
Conclusion
Both Postman and Thunder Client are great tools for API testing, but they serves to different needs. Where extensive, collaborative, and complicated API testing is required, Postman is the best option for large teams with complex workflows, whereas Thunder Client is perfect for the developers who look for lightweight and fast API testing within VS Code. Select the one that suits your development needs and workflow to increase your productivity.
Explore
Node.js Tutorial
3 min read
Introduction & Installation
Node.js Modules , Buffer & Streams
Node.js Asynchronous Programming
Node.js NPM
Node.js Deployments & Communication
Resources & Tools