Open In App

Postman Vs Thunder Client - API Testing Tools

Last Updated : 23 Jul, 2025
Comments
Improve
Suggest changes
2 Likes
Like
Report

When it comes to API testing, Postman and Thunder Client are the first choices for developers. Postman has a powerful set of features that can be used to create, test, and automate APIs, while Thunder Client is a lightweight, VS Code extension focused on simplicity and ease of use for quick API testing.

Postman

Postman has been a leading API testing and development tool for both individual developers and large teams. It has a lot of functionalities and a user-friendly interface, which helps in efficient API development and testing.

Features of Postman

  • Comprehensive Testing Suite: Postman allows for creating complex test scripts using JavaScript for automation of testing processes.
  • Collaboration Tools: Team members can collaborate using shared workspaces, collections, and environments.
  • Collection Runner: You can automate multiple API requests in a sequence with customizable workflows and assertions.
  • Environments and Variables: We can create different environments (e.g., development, staging, production) with variables to manage various API settings.
  • Mock Servers: We can generate mock servers to simulate and test API responses without hitting the live endpoint.
  • API Documentation: It can automatically generate API documentation for the collections.

Thunder Client

Thunder Client is an API client built for Visual Studio Code that offers a fast, lightweight option for API testing. Its simplicity and interactive interface make it a great choice for quick testing without leaving your IDE.

Features of Thunder Client

  • VS Code Integration: Thunder Client can work within the VS Code editor directly.
  • Fast and Lightweight: Thunder Client is built to be light and responsive, focusing on minimal configuration and rapid testing.
  • Environment Variables: Supports creating and using environment variables to make testing flexible.
  • Collections and History: Users can organize requests into collections and easily access past requests with a history feature.
  • JSON Path Assertions: Supports testing responses by validating JSON data directly within the interface.
  • No External Account Required: Unlike Postman, it doesn’t require users to create an account to start testing.

Differences Between Postman and Thunder Client

FeaturePostmanThunder Client
PlatformStandalone ApplicationVS Code Extension
Complex Testing CapabilitiesAdvanced testing with scripts, automationLimited scripting; basic testing
CollaborationShared workspaces and real-time collaborationBasic sharing (via export)
Environment and VariablesAdvanced variable and environment managementBasic variable support
Mock ServersYesNo
User InterfaceStandalone UIEmbedded in VS Code
Speed and LightweightMore features, can be heavierFast, lightweight
Offline ModeCan work offline, sync laterFully offline
API DocumentationAutomatic documentation generationNo built-in documentation feature
CostFree & paid plansFree

Conclusion

Both Postman and Thunder Client are great tools for API testing, but they serves to different needs. Where extensive, collaborative, and complicated API testing is required, Postman is the best option for large teams with complex workflows, whereas Thunder Client is perfect for the developers who look for lightweight and fast API testing within VS Code. Select the one that suits your development needs and workflow to increase your productivity.


Explore