Open In App

Multimodal Embedding

Last Updated : 13 Jun, 2025
Comments
Improve
Suggest changes
Like Article
Like
Report

Multimodal embedding combines different types of data models into a shared embedding space. It is a powerful approach in machine learning that aims to combine and represent information from different modalities in a shared latent space. By embedding multiple modalities together machines can better understand complex concepts that are difficult to capture from a single modality alone.

Multimodal-Embedding
Multimodal embedding

Techniques to implement Multimodal embedding

1. Joint Embedding Models

  • These models embed different types of data into a shared vector space which makes it possible to directly compare them.
  • Use separate encoders for each modality and train the model so that related pairs are closer in the embedding space than unrelated ones.
  • For example: CLIP (by OpenAI)

2. Cross modal transformers

  • Cross modal transformers is a transformer based model that uses cross attention to learn relationships between modalities.
  • Each modality has its own encoder which allows one modality to attend to another learning rich interactions.
  • For example: ViLBERT, LXMERT, VisualBERT.

3. Multimodal Auto encoders

  • Auto encoders that take inputs from multiple modalities and learn a shared latent representation that can reconstruct one or both modalities.
  • A shared encoder processes inputs from different modalities into a single embedding and reconstruct the inputs and teaching the model to capture shared meaning.
  • For example: Multimodal Variational Auto encoders (MVAE)

4. Graph Neural Networks (GNN)

  • It uses a graph structure to model multimodal relationships where each node might represent text, image region and edges model how they relate.
  • Creates a graph where each node is a modality element and GNN layers update node embeddings based on neighbors and helping model complex interactions across modalities.
  • For example: Used in social media analysis, medical diagnosis (text + scan).

For example

CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining) is trained to connect images and their textual descriptions by mapping both into a shared embedding space where semantically similar text and images lie close together.

multimodal_embeddings
Multimodal embedding using CLIP

1. Inputs: An image and a text.

2. Two Encoders: An image encoder (like a CNN or Vision Transformer) turns the image into a vector and a text encoder (like a Transformer) turns the sentence into a vector.

3. Joint Embedding Space: Both vectors are projected into the same high dimensional space. During training the model is optimized so that:

  • Matching image text pairs have high similarity.
  • Non matching pairs have low similarity.

Advantages

  1. Better understanding and Richer representations: Combining multiple modalities help to capture more complete information than a single modality.
  2. Improved performance on tasks: Multimodal embeddings improve results in tasks like: Visual question answering and image captioning because the model leverages complementary signals from each modality.
  3. Robustness and flexibility: Models can handle missing or noisy data better by relying on other modalities. For example: if audio is unclear text can still provide clues.
  4. Enables complex AI applications: Supports models that can understand, generate or relate multiple data types like Conversational AI with images and speech and Multimodal recommendation systems.

Disadvantages

  1. Complexity of model design: Combining multiple modalities requires designing different encoders and fusion mechanisms. The architecture can become quite complex making training and tuning harder.
  2. Data Requirements: Multimodal models often need large datasets with aligned data and such paired multimodal datasets are scarce and expensive to collect.
  3. Modality Imbalance: Sometimes one modality dominates or is more informative than others. If one modality is missing or noisy it can hurt performance if not handled properly.
  4. Computational cost: Processing multiple modalities increases memory and computation requirements. Training and inference become slower and require more resources.

Next Article

Similar Reads