Open In App

Git - Difference Between Merging and Rebasing

Last Updated : 30 Jun, 2024
Comments
Improve
Suggest changes
Like Article
Like
Report

When working with Git, two common strategies for integrating changes from different branches are merging and rebasing. Both techniques serve the purpose of combining code from multiple branches, but they do so in different ways. This article will help you understand the differences between merging and rebasing, and guide you on when to use each strategy.

Git merge

Merging is a way to combine the changes from one branch into another. When you merge a branch, Git creates a new commit called a merge commit that has two parent commits: one from the current branch and one from the branch being merged.

git checkout feature
git merge main

Or, you can write

git merge feature main

How does it work?

It basically, creates a new "feature commit", safeguarding the history of both the branches and giving it a structure like this:-

Features of Merging

  • Integrating feature branches into the main development branch.
  • Resolving conflicts between branches.
  • Preserving the commit history of both branches.

Advantages of Merging

  • Preserves History: Merging preserves the complete history of changes, making it easy to trace back through the commit history.
  • Contextual Clarity: The merge commit provides a clear indication that branches have been combined, offering context for future reference.

Git Rebase

Rebasing is a process of moving or combining a sequence of commits to a new base commit. It allows you to take the changes from one branch and reapply them on top of another branch.

git rebase main

How does it work?

Git rebase actually rebases the feature branch and merges it with the main branch. In simple words, it moves the entire feature branch to the tip of the main branch. The pictorial representation looks a bit like this:-

Features

  • Maintaining a cleaner and more linear commit history.
  • Facilitating easier code review and debugging.
  • Avoiding unnecessary merge commits.

Advantages of Rebasing

  • Cleaner History: Rebasing creates a linear history, which can make the commit history easier to read and understand.
  • Bisecting Simplicity: A linear history simplifies the use of tools like git bisect for debugging.

Difference Between Merging and Rebasing

Git Merge

Git Rebase

Git Merge merges two branches to create a "feature" branch.Git Rebase rebases the feature branch to add the feature branch to the main branch.
Git Merge is comparatively easy. Git Rebase is comparatively harder.
Git Merge safeguards history.Git Rabse doesn't safeguard history.
Git Merge is more suitable for projects with the less active main branch.Git Rebase is suitable for projects with frequently active main branches.
Git Merge forms a chain-like structure.Git Rebase forms a linear structure.
Git Merge is preferable for large no. of people working on a project.Git Rebase is preferable for small groups of people.

Single line command is:

git merge feature main

Single line command is:

git rebase main


Next Article

Similar Reads