Difference Between Fluentd and Logstash
Last Updated :
06 Aug, 2024
To organize the workflow and coordinate teams, management tools are used. With the help of management tools, one can complete any tasks faster, track projects, manage your team, and plan for future tasks. When any device fails, what does a field engineer do? He goes and checks out the log files and with the right application to handle the tasks, it becomes easy to seek out the problem in the device. Both Fluentd and Logstash are log collector software and are tools that are supported by Windows as well as Linux. They are different in various aspects. Let us learn about that in this article.
What is Fluentd?
Fluentd is an open-source data collector. It was developed by Treasure Data in 2011. It is written in programming languages like C and Ruby. After its installation, it runs in the background for collecting, parsing, transforming, analyzing, and storing various types of data. Also, it can be used to collect and aggregate logs in Kubernetes.
- Features
- It has community-driven support.
- It has more than 650 plugins available.
- It requires very little resource system as it is written in C and Ruby language.
- Advantages
- It has quite flexible and extensible parsing options.
- It supports a wide array of input formats.
- It supports the Apache version 2.0 license.
- Disadvantages
- It does not support multithreading.
- It is highly and only recommended to use while running small applications.
- The performance of speed is affected as it is written in C but the plugin framework is written in Ruby.
What is Logstash?
Logstash allows the user to collect data from a variety of sources, transform it and then send the result to the desired location. It was developed in 2016 by Jordan Sissel. It is written in Java and Ruby language. It is one of the ELT tools. It can be used when complex pipelines are handling multiple data formats.
- Features
- It is highly extensible as it can create and configure the pipeline according to the user.
- It has fully secure ingest pipelines.
- It centrally manages deployments with a single User Interface.
- Advantages
- It provides good and clear documentation.
- It is quite flexible because of the presence of several plugins.
- It is a great tool for prototyping.
- Disadvantages
- It is quite slower in terms of performance in comparison with its alternatives.
- It has no support for the enterprise.
Difference between Fluentd vs Logstash
Parameters | Fluentd | Logstash |
---|
Developed | Fluentd is written and developed in CRuby. | Logstash is written and developed in JRuby. |
---|
Language | It is written in CRuby and there is no need for Java runtime dependencies. | It is written in JRuby and does not require Java runtime on the host machine. |
---|
Multithreading | It does not support multithreading. | It supports Multithreading. |
---|
Platform | It became available for windows after 2015. | It runs on Windows and Linux both. |
---|
Enterprise Support | It has the full support of the enterprise. | It has no support from the enterprise. |
---|
Plugins, Parsers, and in-reliability | It has a decentralized repository and does not host all the plugins under one single repository. It is having support for almost 500 plugins with support offered for in-built reliability. | It has a single centralized repository where all the plugins are managed. There are limited plugins available in Logstash with no support for in-built reliability. It has approx 200 plugins. |
---|
Event Routing | It uses Tagging Approach. This approach is quite easy to use than conditional statements. | It uses if-then-else statements. This approach is a little difficult to use. |
---|
Memory Consumption | It is memory efficient. It is highly recommended to use while running small applications. | It consumes more memory than Fluentd. Using a small number of machines will not make much difference in the memory consumption of both the tools but if a large amount of machines is used, then it is clearly visible that Logstash is taking 3 times more memory than Fluentd. |
---|
Conclusion
Fluentd is a good choice if you’re looking for vendor neutrality. One can opt for Fluentd over Logstash because it gives the ability to route, gives more simplified solutions, and has a wide range of plugins available. Both tools have their own features, pros, and cons. Now, it is all up to the choice of the user to choose which tool depending on their requirements.
Similar Reads
Difference between Hue and Pig 1. Pig : Pig is used for the analysis of a large amount of data. It is abstract over MapReduce. Pig is used to perform all kinds of data manipulation operations in Hadoop. It provides the Pig-Latin language to write the code that contains many inbuilt functions like join, filter, etc. The two parts
2 min read
Difference Between Hive and Hue To process and analyze big data, organizations use Hadoop, an open-source framework that handles vast amounts of structured and unstructured data. Within the Hadoop ecosystem, Hive and Hue serve different purposes. Hive is a data warehouse tool that enables users to run SQL-like queries on large dat
5 min read
Difference between MapReduce and Pig MapReduce is a model that works over Hadoop to access big data efficiently stored in HDFS (Hadoop Distributed File System). It is the core component of Hadoop, which divides the big data into small chunks and process them parallelly. Features of MapReduce: It can store and distribute huge data acros
2 min read
Difference between Trafodion and ToroDB 1. Trafodion : It is a Transactional SQL-on-Hadoop DBMS. It is a webscale SQL-on-Hadoop solution enabling transnational or operational workloads on Apache Hadoop. The name âTrafodionâ pronounced as âTra-vod-eee-onâ. It is a relational database management system that runs on Apache Hadoop which provi
2 min read
Difference between CouchDB and Redis 1. CouchDB : Apache CouchDB is an open-source document-oriented NoSQL database that uses multiple formats and protocols to store, transfer, and process its data, it uses JSON to store data, JavaScript as its query language using MapReduce, and HTTP for an API. It was developed by Apache Software Fou
2 min read