| Definition | Learns how data is generated by modeling the joint probability distribution of input and output. | Learns the boundary between classes by modeling the conditional probability of the output given the input. |
| Main Goal | To generate or simulate new data similar to what it has learned. | To classify or predict outcomes based on given data. |
| Focus | Understands how the data is formed and tries to replicate it. | Focuses on distinguishing between different classes or outcomes. |
| Mathematical View | Learns ( P(x, y) ) — the joint probability of input and output. | Learns ( P(y |
| Type of Learning | Can be unsupervised, semi-supervised, or self-supervised. | Primarily supervised learning. |
| Output Type | Produces new data samples that resemble the training data (creative generation). | Produces labels, predictions, or probabilities (decision-making). |
| Example Tasks | Text generation, image creation, audio synthesis, data augmentation. | Sentiment analysis, spam detection, object recognition, fraud detection. |
| Examples of Models | GANs (Generative Adversarial Networks), VAEs (Variational Autoencoders), GPT, Naive Bayes. | Logistic Regression, SVM, Decision Tree, Random Forest, standard Neural Networks. |
| Data Understanding | Builds an internal representation of data distribution, enabling creativity. | Focuses only on decision boundaries — not data generation. |
| Complexity | Usually more complex because it needs to model entire data distributions. | Less complex as it only needs to separate classes or predict labels. |
| Generalization | Can generalize better in low-data scenarios because it learns the data structure deeply. | Requires larger labeled datasets to achieve good accuracy. |
| Output Examples | A new paragraph written in the style of Shakespeare, a realistic fake human face. | Predicting if an email is spam or not, classifying a photo as a cat or dog. |
| Training Process | Often involves two models (like in GANs: Generator and Discriminator) or probabilistic modeling. | Involves direct optimization for classification or regression accuracy. |
| Interpretability | Harder to interpret — focuses on data generation patterns. | Easier to interpret — focuses on decision-making logic. |
| Strengths | Great for creative tasks and data simulation; handles missing or limited data well. | Excellent for classification, prediction, and decision-making. |
| Weaknesses | Computationally expensive and harder to train; may generate biased or unrealistic samples. | Limited creativity; can’t generate new data outside training scope. |