How to Know my Future

Table of Contents

How to know | my future | Alexander Rosacruz | Editorial Anuket

Chapter 1 | The history | to predict the future

Chapter 2 | Scientific discoveries

Chapter 3 | rules for | predict the future

Chapter 4 | How to predict the future

Chapter 5 | Numerology

Chapter 6 | divination with cards

Chapter 7 | Other divinatory arts

How to know

my future

––––––––

Alexander Rosacruz

Editorial Anuket

––––––––

Index:

Chap.1 The story of predicting the future

Chap.2 Scientific discoveries

Chap.3 Rules for predicting the future

Chap.4 How to predict the future

Chap.5 Numerology

Chap.6 Divination with cards

Chap.7 Other divinatory arts

Chapter 1

The history

to predict the future

––––––––

Humanity has been trying to predict what will happen in the future for centuries. However, even the most advanced technologies cannot solve the fundamental problems of this forecasting process. So what is the solution?

Predicting what will happen in the future, knowing what will happen to me in the future, and taking a position accordingly have been some of the greatest passions of people throughout history. While the source of these predictions in ancient times were seers and fortune tellers who were believed to have psychic powers, today we are trying to predict the future with much more advanced methods using supercomputers and artificial intelligence, and we can get more accurate results. But according to the historian of science Amanda Rees of the University of York, predictions made with these advanced technologies will be no more useful than prophecies based on ancient methods in terms of their contribution to humanity.

According to this scientist The future has a past. The good thing is that we can learn from this past. The downside is that we rarely take that class. Because, in fact, the past of the future clearly shows that knowing the future is not necessarily beneficial. But that still doesn't stop us from trying.

All over the world, from Mesopotamia to Manhattan, leaders sought to predict the future to gain strategic advantage. However, they often misunderstood what was said or misunderstood the speaker's political motives or lack of foresight. They also often chose to ignore predictions that forced them to face facts they didn't like. Even the technological innovations of the 21st century have not been able to solve these fundamental problems, because the accuracy of the results obtained with computer programs is ultimately proportional to the accuracy of the data entered.

It is assumed that the more scientific the method used in this matter, the more accurate the predictions will be. However, this assumption creates more problems than it solves, as it often ignores or fails to take into account the diversity of human experiences. Against this background, it is hard to believe that artificial intelligence will play an increasingly important role and that predictions based on more accurate and intelligent technologies will be more beneficial than other examples in human history.

––––––––

Math vs prophecy

People have tried to understand what the future will be like since the earliest civilizations. The methods used to predict and interpret the future have shown serious differences according to time and space. The most important difference lies in whether the prediction is made by someone with innate prophetic ability or by systems that make calculations within certain rules. For example, one of the ancient ways was based on the ability of seers and shamans to communicate with other dimensions of being. However, divination methods such as astrology, palmistry, numerology, and the Tarot depend on the ability of the practitioner to learn and interpret a system based on complex (and sometimes very mathematical) theoretical rules and adapt it to specific situations. It is possible to place methods such as dream interpretation or invocation based on experience, in part, somewhere between these two extreme examples. There are many examples of the use of both strategies to predict the future, both in the past and in the present.

On the other hand, some analysts have resorted to strategies based on collaborative forecasts instead of technological developments in their future forecasts. For example, polling public and personal opinion are based on a very simple principle: ask people what they think they should do or what will happen. The responses then need to be carefully interpreted, either quantitatively, such as voter orientation surveys, or through qualitative analysis, such as the Delphi technique. The Delphi strategy is based on exploiting the mind of a very specific audience. The main idea here is that discussion of a particular topic by a group of experts will produce more accurate results than individual estimates.

––––––––

Future predictions based on patterns and variables

As these strategies continue to evolve, two very different philosophies have emerged to predict the future of