Research Reactor Spent Fuel Management: Options and Support to Decision Making
By IAEA
()
About this ebook
Other titles in Research Reactor Spent Fuel Management Series (30)
Communication and Stakeholder Involvement in Radioactive Waste Disposal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Reactor Technology Assessment for Near Term Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Radioactive Lightning Conductors and Their Associated Radioactive Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of National Infrastructure for the Uranium Production Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear–Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCosting Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Disposal Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatus and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Review on the Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Nuclear Power Plant Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperience in the Management of Radioactive Waste After Nuclear Accidents: A Basis for Preplanning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Depleted Uranium Used as Shielding in Disused Radiation Devices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImpact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsData Analysis and Collection for Costing of Research Reactor Decommissioning: Final Report of the DACCORD Collaborative Project Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Factors Engineering Aspects of Instrumentation and Control System Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSystematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel: Processes, Methodology and Practices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVendor and User Requirements and Responsibilities in Nuclear Cogeneration Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Status of Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-irradiation Examination Techniques for Research Reactor Fuels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Life Cycle Risk Management for New Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTraining and Human Resource Considerations for Nuclear Facility Decommissioning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Human Resources in the Field of Nuclear Energy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecommissioning at a Multifacility Site Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Assessing Pipe Failure Rates in Advanced Water Cooled Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Ionization Chamber Smoke Detectors: Approaches and Practical Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInitiating Nuclear Power Programmes: Responsibilities and Capabilities of Owners and Operators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Read more from Iaea
Comprehensive Audits of Radiotherapy Practices: A Tool for Quality Improvement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Expert Group on Nuclear Liability (INLEX): A Collective View on the First Two Decades Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Assessment of Climate, Land, Energy and Water Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuidance On Setting Up a Comprehensive Cancer Centre Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClimate Change and Nuclear Power 2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdapting the Energy Sector to Climate Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Non-Invasive Cardiovascular Imaging: A Guide for the Practitioner Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Research Reactor Spent Fuel Management
Titles in the series (62)
Communication and Stakeholder Involvement in Radioactive Waste Disposal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Reactor Technology Assessment for Near Term Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Radioactive Lightning Conductors and Their Associated Radioactive Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of National Infrastructure for the Uranium Production Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear–Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCosting Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Disposal Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatus and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Review on the Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Nuclear Power Plant Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperience in the Management of Radioactive Waste After Nuclear Accidents: A Basis for Preplanning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Depleted Uranium Used as Shielding in Disused Radiation Devices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImpact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsData Analysis and Collection for Costing of Research Reactor Decommissioning: Final Report of the DACCORD Collaborative Project Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Factors Engineering Aspects of Instrumentation and Control System Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSystematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel: Processes, Methodology and Practices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVendor and User Requirements and Responsibilities in Nuclear Cogeneration Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Status of Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-irradiation Examination Techniques for Research Reactor Fuels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Life Cycle Risk Management for New Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTraining and Human Resource Considerations for Nuclear Facility Decommissioning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Human Resources in the Field of Nuclear Energy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecommissioning at a Multifacility Site Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Assessing Pipe Failure Rates in Advanced Water Cooled Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Ionization Chamber Smoke Detectors: Approaches and Practical Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInitiating Nuclear Power Programmes: Responsibilities and Capabilities of Owners and Operators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Practices for Interim Storage of Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResource Requirements for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatus and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Life Cycle Risk Management for New Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of National Infrastructure for the Uranium Production Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeadership, Management and Culture for Safety in Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign of Fuel Handling and Storage Systems for Nuclear Power Plants: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Status of Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgeing Management for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDetermination of Environmental Remediation End States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnvironmental Protection in New Nuclear Power Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Radioactive Lightning Conductors and Their Associated Radioactive Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSafety of Uranium Fuel Fabrication Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnical Approaches for the Management of Separated Civilian Plutonium Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Siting Activities for Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConsiderations on Decommissioning in the Design and Operation of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Nuclear Management Academy Master’s Programmes in Nuclear Technology Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection and Radioactive Waste Management in the Design and Operation of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProject Management in Construction of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign of the Reactor Core for Nuclear Power Plants: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCosting Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Disposal Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStorage of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommissioning of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-irradiation Examination Techniques for Research Reactor Fuels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplicability of IAEA Safety Standards to Non-Water Cooled Reactors and Small Modular Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplication of Wireless Technologies in Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecific Considerations and Guidance for the Establishment of Ionizing Radiation Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Power Resources For You
The Homeowner's DIY Guide to Electrical Wiring Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Electronics All-in-One For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5DIY Lithium Battery Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Journeyman Electrician Exam Prep Mastery 2025-2026 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ultimate Solar Power Design Guide Less Theory More Practice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Solar Power Demystified: The Beginners Guide To Solar Power, Energy Independence And Lower Bills Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How Do Electric Motors Work? Physics Books for Kids | Children's Physics Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOff Grid Solar: A handbook for Photovoltaics with Lead-Acid or Lithium-Ion batteries Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Electrical Machines: Lecture Notes for Electrical Machines Course Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnergy: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5OFF-GRID PROJECTS: Essential Guide to Enhance DIY Skills for Self-Reliance Preppers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSolar Electricity Basics: Powering Your Home or Office with Solar Energy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Photovoltaic Design and Installation For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Grid: The Fraying Wires Between Americans and Our Energy Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Way Home: Tales from a life without technology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Renewable Energy Sources - Wind, Solar and Hydro Energy Edition : Environment Books for Kids | Children's Environment Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRenewable Energy Policies for Cities: Buildings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIke's Road Trip: How Eisenhower's 1919 Convoy Paved the Way for the Roads We Travel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Solar Power Your Home For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The New 3D Layout for Oil & Gas Offshore Projects: How to ensure success Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Solar Case Study: 6.4 kW Home Power Generator Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Design of Rotating Electrical Machines Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Energy, Light and Electricity - Introduction to Physics - Physics Book for 12 Year Old | Children's Physics Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmergency Preparedness and Off-Grid Communication Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Solar Power: How to Construct (and Use) the 45W Harbor Freight Solar Kit Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Research Reactor Spent Fuel Management
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Research Reactor Spent Fuel Management - IAEA
RESEARCH REACTOR
SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT:
OPTIONS AND SUPPORT TO
DECISION MAKING
IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES No. NF-T-3.9
RESEARCH REACTOR
SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT:
OPTIONS AND SUPPORT TO
DECISION MAKING
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
VIENNA, 2021
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All IAEA scientific and technical publications are protected by the terms of the Universal Copyright Convention as adopted in 1952 (Berne) and as revised in 1972 (Paris). The copyright has since been extended by the World Intellectual Property Organization (Geneva) to include electronic and virtual intellectual property. Permission to use whole or parts of texts contained in IAEA publications in printed or electronic form must be obtained and is usually subject to royalty agreements. Proposals for non-commercial reproductions and translations are welcomed and considered on a case-by-case basis. Enquiries should be addressed to the IAEA Publishing Section at:
Marketing and Sales Unit, Publishing Section
International Atomic Energy Agency
Vienna International Centre
PO Box 100
1400 Vienna, Austria
fax: +43 1 26007 22529
tel.: +43 1 2600 22417
email: [email protected]
www.iaea.org/publications
© IAEA, 2021
Printed by the IAEA in Austria
December 2021
STI/PUB/1954
IAEA Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Names: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Title: Research reactor spent fuel management : options and support to decision making / International Atomic Energy Agency.
Description: Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency, 2021. | Series: IAEA nuclear energy series, ISSN 1995–7807 ; no. NF-T-3.9 | Includes bibliographical references.
Identifiers: IAEAL 21-01448 | ISBN 978–92–0–120021–1 (paperback : alk. paper) | ISBN 978–92–0–120121–8 (pdf) | ISBN 978–92–0–120221–5 (epub)
Subjects: LCSH: Spent reactor fuels — Management. | Radioactive wastes — Management. | Reactor fuel reprocessing. | Nuclear reactors — Safety measures.
Classification: UDC 621.039.59 | STI/PUB/1954
FOREWORD
The IAEA’s statutory role is to seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world
. Among other functions, the Agency is authorized to foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on peaceful uses of atomic energy
. One way this is achieved is through a range of technical publications including the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series.
The IAEA Nuclear Energy Series comprises publications designed to further the use of nuclear technologies in support of sustainable development, to advance nuclear science and technology, catalyse innovation and build capacity to support the existing and expanded use of nuclear power and nuclear science applications. The publications include information covering all policy, technological and management aspects of the definition and implementation of activities involving the peaceful use of nuclear technology.
The IAEA safety standards establish fundamental principles, requirements and recommendations to ensure nuclear safety and serve as a global reference for protecting people and the environment from harmful effects of ionizing radiation.
When IAEA Nuclear Energy Series publications address safety, it is ensured that the IAEA safety standards are referred to as the current boundary conditions for the application of nuclear technology.
Research reactors are operated in more than 50 countries around the world and play an important role in science, industry and medicine. Each country is responsible for the radioactive waste derived from its research reactor operations, including research reactor spent nuclear fuel (RRSNF). An effective RRSNF management plan comprises the management of the RRSNF from its removal from the research reactor core until its final disposal, and may include interim stages such as storage, conditioning and reprocessing, either domestically or abroad.
To help Member States address their RRSNF responsibilities, the IAEA organized a three year coordinated research project entitled Options and Technologies for Managing the Back End of the Research Reactor Nuclear Fuel Cycle. The goal of the project and of this resulting publication was to provide a comprehensive set of RRSNF management strategies and to assist in the decision making process for selecting the preferred option for each Member State’s situation. A set of decision support tools was developed to consider not only the costs of the possible RRSNF management strategies but also the non-economic factors that might influence their selection. These tools and the tutorials on their use are available for download as supplementary files on the publication’s individual web page at www.iaea.org/publications.
The IAEA wishes to thank all of those who participated in the CRP and helped in the drafting and preparation of this publication. The IAEA officers responsible for this publication were F. Marshall and S. Geupel of the Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology.
EDITORAL NOTE
This publication has been edited by the editorial staff of the IAEA to the extent considered necessary for the reader’s assistance. It does not address questions of responsibility, legal or otherwise, for acts or omissions on the part of any person.
Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this publication, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use.
Guidance provided here, describing good practices, represents expert opinion but does not constitute recommendations made on the basis of a consensus of Member States.
The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries.
The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA.
The IAEA has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third party Internet web sites referred to in this book and does not guarantee that any content on such web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
The authoritative version of this publication is the hard copy issued at the same time and available as pdf on www.iaea.org/publications. To create this version for e-readers, certain changes have been made, including a the movement of some figures and tables.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
1.2. Scope
1.3. Objectives
1.4. Structure
2. TECHNOLOGIES FOR RRSNF MANAGEMENT
2.1. Storage
2.2. Conditioning
2.3. Reprocessing
2.4. Transportation
2.5. Management of damaged RRSNF
2.6. Geological disposal
2.7. Fuel return programmes
3. SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND SCENARIOS
4. FACTORS FOR EVALUATING RRSNF OPTIONS
4.1. Legal and regulatory considerations
4.2. Industrial and technical considerations
4.3. Political support
4.4. Public acceptance
4.5. Human resources
4.6. Environmental impact
4.7. Regional and international partnerships
5. DECISION-SUPPORT FRAMEWORK TOOLS
5.1. Overview and use of the models
5.2. BRIDE
5.3. FERREX
6. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REFERENCES
Annex I: CURRENT RRSNF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN PARTICIPATING MEMBER STATES
Annex II: COUNTRY CASE STUDIES
GLOSSARY
INTRODUCTION TO THE SUPPLEMENTARY FILES
ABBREVIATIONS
CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW
STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES
1. INTRODUCTION
This IAEA publication summarizes the results of the Coordinated Research Project (CRP) T33001 on Options and Technologies for Managing the Back End of the Research Reactor Nuclear Fuel Cycle, which took place from 2015 to 2018 with the participation of 16 institutions from 15 Member States.
1.1. Background
Research reactors (RRs) are used worldwide for activities such as the education of nuclear scientists and engineers, for general and refresher training of the nuclear power workforce, to produce medical and industrial radioisotopes, for silicon doping, to perform advanced fuel and material testing to support life extension of operating nuclear power plants (NPPs), to validate safety analysis design methods for new power plants, to qualify new fuels, and to validate modelling and calculation tools. RRs are also key tools in building and maintaining national nuclear capacity and achieving public acceptance of nuclear technologies [1]. As of March 2019, there are 227 RRs operating around the world, with another 23 planned or in construction [2]. An additional 136 RRs are in extended or permanent shutdown, or under decommissioning.
There is a clear and unequivocal understanding that each country is ethically and legally responsible for its own spent fuel and nuclear waste, as stated by both the IAEA, via the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management [3], and by the international nuclear waste disposal concepts [4] summarized by the World Nuclear Association (WNA). Member States operating or having previously operated a RR (research reactor) are responsible for the safe, secure and sustainable management of associated radioactive waste, including RR spent nuclear fuel (RRSNF). This includes the storage and ultimate disposal of conditioned RRSNF, or the corresponding equivalent waste generated and returned following reprocessing of the spent fuel.
The main objective in managing and disposing of radioactive waste is to protect people, including future generations, and the environment. Regional or national laws and directives provide a regulatory framework for the management of spent fuel. The IAEA provides Member States with safety standards, guidelines and good practice examples to enable them to establish and maintain a responsible waste management programme.
Selection and implementation of the most appropriate nuclear waste management programme can be very challenging considering the numerous elements and factors that must be addressed, such as technological feasibility, economics, social acceptance and environmental impact. The aim of this publication is to support RR operating organizations and Member States in developing a spent fuel management programme, including final disposal, that is sustainable, is secure [5], and complies with international and national regulations.
One key challenge when developing general recommendations for RRSNF management options lies in the diversity of spent fuel types, locations and national or regional circumstances, rather than mass or volume alone, particularly since typical RRSNF inventories are relatively small. Presently, many countries lack an effective long term policy for managing RRSNF. A methodical review and compilation of technology options for RRSNF management is therefore needed.
1.1.1. IAEA initiatives related to RRSNF issues
The importance of the RRSNF management challenge has been highlighted in past IAEA publications and workshops. One of the first reports, IAEA-TECDOC-1508, Spent Fuel Management Options for Research Reactors in Latin America [6], originated from a regional Technical Cooperation project. Reference [6] summarizes the results of this project in identifying and assessing a number of viable alternatives for RRSNF management from five participating countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Peru). The basic conditions for a regional strategy for managing spent fuel, the options for operational and interim storage, spent fuel conditioning and final disposal were considered.
Based on requests from Member States, the IAEA has continued to address elements of RRSNF management. Other IAEA publications about RRSNF storage are Management and Storage of Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel: Proceedings of a Technical Meeting held in Thurso, United Kingdom, 19–22 October 2009 [7], IAEA-TECDOC-1637, Corrosion of Research Reactor Aluminium Clad Spent Fuel in Water [8], IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NP-T-5.2, Good Practices for Water Quality Management in Research Reactors and Spent Fuel Storage Facilities [9], and IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-1.11, Available Reprocessing and Recycling Services for Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel [10].
Starting in the 1990s, along with the efforts of RR operating organizations to eliminate the use of highly enriched uranium (HEU), several countries have taken advantage of the so-called ‘take back’ programmes supported by the IAEA, the Russian Federation and the United States of America. These initiatives include the United States of America’s Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel (FRRSNF) acceptance programme and the Russian Research Reactor Fuel Return (RRRFR) programme.
In 2006, the IAEA organized a Technical Meeting on National Experiences on Return of Research Reactor Spent Fuel to the Country of Origin, which mainly dealt with the requirements for technical and administrative preparations for the shipment of RRSNF to the United States of America under the FRRSNF acceptance programme. It included national experiences of shipping back fuel to the United States of America as the country of origin, and resulted in IAEA-TECDOC-1593, Return of Research Reactor Spent Fuel to the Country of Origin: Requirements for Technical and Administrative Preparations and National Experiences, published in 2008 [11]. The IAEA has assisted both fuel return programmes, providing logistical support to Member States for the fuel shipments. More detail on these return programmes is provided in Section 2 of this publication.
To help address Member States’ responsibilities mentioned above, the IAEA organized a CRP on Options and Technologies for Managing the Back End of the Research Reactor Nuclear Fuel Cycle (2015‒2018), to address the issues faced by owners of RRs with regard to the management and disposal of RRSNF. This CRP, the results of which are reported in this publication, emphasized concerns specific to countries that do not possess the infrastructure for a large commercial nuclear power programme.
The goal of the CRP was to develop a comprehensive set of technology options for RRSNF management. This includes storage, transport, processing and ultimate disposal. In addition, the CRP developed a set of tools to assist Member States in developing an RRSNF management strategy. First, a decision-support tool, Back end Research Reactor Integrated Decision making Evaluation (BRIDE), was designed to analyse scenarios comprising these options with a focus on their economic and non-economic aspects, taking into consideration technology development, and human and economic resource requirements. The options analysis helps to inform decision makers about the advantages and disadvantages of each option, assisting new and existing RR operating organizations in taking decisions on future disposal strategies. Additionally, a bottom-up detailed cost estimating tool, Fuel Cycle Cost Estimation for