Perceptual Interpretation & Cumulative Perceptual Assimilation in Fundamental/Essential Theory: A Parody of a Medical Text- an Exposition of Informative Comic Relief

PERCEPTUAL

INTERPRETATION &

CUMULATIVE

PERCEPTUAL

ASSIMILATION IN

FUNDAMENTAL/

ESSENTIAL THEORY

A Parody of a Medical Text-

An Exposition of Informative Comic Relief

Johnathan Q. Smythe

Copyright © 2005 by Johnathan Q. Smythe.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any

form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording,

or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing

from the copyright owner.

This book was printed in the United States of America.

To order additional copies of this book, contact:

Xlibris Corporation

1-888-795-4274

www.Xlibris.com

[email protected]

18536

Contents

INTRODUCTION

LEARNING AND PSYCHOLOGY

TECHNOLOGIES OF INSTRUCTION

DEVELOPING COGNITION

THE ‘DESIGN’ OF RESEARCH

QUANTIFYING METHODOLOGIES

SAME SUBJECT, DIFFERENT DAY

VISUAL TONE AND PITCH RESPONSE, PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL PROMPTER EXERCISES, PSYCHO-ANALYSIS SYSTEMS, ALPHA AND BETA

BIBLIOGRAPHY

INTRODUCTION

Saying things wrong is the epitome of a cognitive psychological dilemma, source. A legendary musician once said some thing about finding the right way to go about making people understand their pretensions. This probably means that people know, and believe they know, what they mean, but fewer are introspective enough and conscientious enough to routinely review their understandings with any formality or exceptional training in conceptual matters of just this kind, or at all, for themselves or others, regarding subliminal or, more appropriately, chronically sublimated bias-emotional, conscientious, and neuro-defensive conditional factors that instinctively produce language and language cognition as a cerebral function. Behavioral patterns are lingually deterministic and act as a wall for cerebral intuitive patterns, and this still becomes so automated and peripherally driven as to be invisible even when severely curving perspective, and in all of perceptual limitations otherwise, which incidentally fuel cognitive-instinctive-neuro-defensive bias.

Old school notes, from two decades previously, provoked this issue and particularly one set which began with the sentence, 2000 years ago people thought the earth was the center of the universe. Man was the predominant being. This was typical and still deplorable. A narcissistic notion of this kind taught as deliberately as fact and intended only to pander some professional educator to vein, unaccomplished students. Clowning for students was on the rise at that time and pandering to their egos might even be standardized educational doctrine in many districts today. What was 2000 years ago? The Earth was for all practical, real, and

JOHNATHAN Q. SMYTHE imaginative purposes the center of the universe in such an era. It is still amongst the untreated vain, and had anyone said universe regarding this insidious functional psychological reality? Is there a granite tablet somewhere that specifically says universe in relation to mankind and matter, or even some sorts of matter?

Psychological health is like the best possible integrations of software, and for the size of systems and circumstance and purposes and correlations with other computers. It must be medically unsound to lie to one’s self or set one’s self up deficiently in any circumstance that is knowingly so. People do though. For any variety of reasons that involve vanity, emotional insecurity, abject fear of ‘unbearable’ pain and suffering, or whose mentalities never produced or acquire artificial ontological conceptual notions that coincided with any lingual or impressionistic memory cognitions or ultimately any understanding for them, they do, and which are all medical issues, and all these medical issues are moral issues. These though are definitive matters and are separated by time, complexity, and evolution processes. This is not unlike the term schizophrenia as a singular example, which is perhaps like a software virus, an illogical or disfunctional neuro-avenue that has snagged in a system function so primary and semi-conscious that it is virtually undetectable, even by the greater skills of hypnosis. Such problems are often incurable except to erase the befuddled cognitive function by treating the realm of the brain containing it and this causing guessing at which area of functions and subordinate functions to ‘disable,’ which destroys the chronology that is the strength of the emotional and primal-instinctive integrity, at least partially, thus slowing it’s processes and debilitating it’s will to ‘inspiration’ and emotional appreciation. The integration of the healthier brain functions is damaged or destroyed and has to be repaired or rebuilt conceptually, allowing insecurities to flourish.

Schizophrenics are never born, they are made. They are, as a medical issue, not defined plainly, or accurately though; and often, or socially, hardly at all. They are a magical disorder that comes and goes and where insurance may stop the definition reflects it. It is interesting that this may be so, also, considering such deviance cases as gays and lesbians, which arguably are born, and from lack of corrective ‘dietary’/chemical treatment are finished (or made) as such.

Lunatics, generally, are the issue of environment: nurture, or the lack of it; and all the variant in-betweens that are the essence of a single sociological matter. During new moons and full moons tides are high or low, the moon is in some phase of perigee or apogee, gravity is, in a nutshell, slightly lighter or slightly heavier than even weather extremes otherwise, and people feel, peripherally, stronger, better, and lighter than they had before, or, superficially inexplicably, heavier. Depressed and other morally oppressed people feel, perhaps, unusually better, and for no immediately rational reason. This, throughout history, has led to compulsive euphoria and obsessive giddy hysteria which became known as lunacy. Until the 18th century this pragmatic and medical meaning was apparently common. Then, for social politics sake, it was rejected as non-scientific and meaningless because of its age and commonality amongst social as well as medical understandings. In short, it was not as marketable, academically or otherwise, and because lay people already knew more about it than the evolving professional medical community. Also, it had a heavy load of incidental, peripheral, connotative meanings that were more easily rejected than cleaned.

All of this was being considered in the passing of leisure time as common Astronomy notes were paged through how anyone learns anything at all. There was a notation regarding the relationship between temperature and color. Apparently, around 1666, Isaac Newton discovered that when sunlight passes through a glass prism it separates into different colors, what would come to be realized as wavelengths of fluid ethereal energy. The spectrum of colors range from longest to shortest and lightest to darkest. The shorter wavelengths slow down the most and bend the most. The longest slow and bend the least with violet at the extreme most and red at the extreme least. It might be appropriate and reasonable to speculate that sentient nervous systems perceiving these physical phenomena in all of their various material and environmental aspects suppress themselves or stimulate themselves to constantly adjust and in-tune themselves to environmental or (other) extraneous sources for primal, survival (originally, organically chemical-electrically) reasons. However, anymore there is the reality and complexity and sophistications of artificial light and accelerated and amplified light variations; and informations that use light combinations arbitrarily and crudely and corruptly bombarding the neuro-sensory exteriors. The subliminal effects are unimaginable but more structural and physiological than primarily or initially psychological. It could easily be supposed that artificial light damages the subconscious and semiconscious nervous centers and temporarily disrupts and hampers cognitive and super-conventional neuro-rhythms for indefinite periods of time.

This being nominal and non-sensational to other medical issues makes the phenomenon seem just to be insignificant. In the mind, though, anyone might know that insignificance is a non-reality, as well as ‘being’ non-reality. Something for which whole universes could be devoted, should any repeating stimuli, however incidental and accidental, happen often enough and be seen by the right sets of cognitive processes ungrounded effectively and which might be unnoticed perpetually. A nausea provoking compulsive realization could evolve inexplicably on every occasion related or relatable by the rational or the imaginative-rational consciousness to particular qualities of stimuli. It is then, potentially universally truthfull and majorally consciously unrealized or morally-comprehensively unrealized (conscientiously unrealized), that a perceptual anomaly exists that is elementary and fundamental to modern societies that requires standardized medically regulated, edited, and legally processed reviews of, representations of information from industries and public administrations and by industries and administrations and particularly involving technologies of artificial light. The fundamental extreme of building aesthetics therapeutically enhanced being unsuggested as a public jurisdiction, not a private medical-industrial philanthropy, untouched mediums of electronics whose only moral (medical) regulation has been commercial marketing must be also. It is for the protection of the public trust that elemental regulation of all critical health issues must be, and by precedents of the FDA and the Department of Health as legislated already with better articulations of core principles already existing. That being suggested, the era of colored walls in hospitals and colored pages in children’s text books is only three decades old in nominal effective practice and change takes Time and Pragmatic Articulation, if nothing else.

As notes were considered, information and misinformation began to blurr and even as awareness and conscientious introspection were fully aware of a sort of problem, though pictured over a greater amount of time and realized by the persistence of the conscientious eye, the misinformation was still just as real as the information, but occasionally a clarity brought forth from vigilant extra efforts would renew the greater more likely real conceptual connections. The print was just as bold. The sentences were just as matter of fact, and still many blatant irrational connotations were offered in the same rich tones as the rest and in a clearly clashing modern and personal key. Worsely, the matter was not matter. The matter easily and inevitably just did not matter. The only difference in this particular case circumstance was that a lot of better sources of information had been acquired and absorbed since the formulation of the older memorizations, the older notes. There were now checks and balances. There was now a scale for affecting and effecting emotional and rational equilibriums as the comprehension’s successes seemed instinctively and deeply tied to the will (to survive), and it’s emotional driver and overflow electrically and behaviorally reactively.

There was now a living, functioning cerebral, neurological dialectic and personal dialect and dialog. Not to have at least this much analytical and fundamental emotional-intellectual protection, and of any sort of valid contextual and ontological quality, is an amazing and dangerous frailty of the neurological condition. It is no wonder people lose faith in the desolate, endless, and often meaningless varieties of the world (other people or themselves comparatively to other people). It is no wonder they find emotional solace in conformity. It is odd that they could ever consider being different except as a rhetorical grievance against disfunctional individuals for a particular kind of group.

While looking at some notes from an undergraduate geology class, fundamental notions which had once so focused imagination, it was as though abstract art were now viewable once again. Metamorphic rocks are formed from all other rock types and various heats and pressures under the surface of the earth. Metasomatism is the process of transportation of new minerals by chemical activities micro-circumstantial and macro-circumstantial. Ions from outside sources energize rock matter and gradually, or not so gradually, metamorphose it.

Foliation is the asymmetry of rock structures and is caused by physical pressures and chemical activities and agitations. The perpetual assimilations of impressions that are the natural issues of the human mind and new technologies are gaining in the attempt to understand the nervous system’s tendency to react chemically as well as and in congruence of involuntarily physically to constrain the body from harm and in so doing, often damaging or even killing the system in the process. That which static electrical evolution provided to protect the system is by comprehensive vantages so crude and ignorant that it can damage and destroy the system increasingly frequently in ‘man-made’ environments. Evolution is not an intelligent process. It is a geo-physical one and, eventually, a bio-physical one, as cases may be. Humanity evolved from rocks. Rocks and particularly mineral composites are where all organisms come from, and as the greater acid significant composites elaborated and sophisticated over time and expanded, they (moved) far enough away from comparable base composites to achieve relative balance, slight ionic variance and orbits, and reconstructive cooperation micro-systems, such that they were introduced to the already collecting greater extremes of static ionic elemental particles (gases) such as hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen known to human evolution. Theories of evolution, like any other mortality entertainments, are just that, entertainments. They remind personalities that they are geo-physically related to other biophysical phenomena. They play upon diverse micro and macro processes which produce infinite insignificant variations and by natural proportion to their absolute physical diversity, occasional qualitative exceptions, reconstitutions, and new integers of being. That mankind came from apes was never proven, for the same reasons that he or she came from the sea and amphibeans, will never be. They came from physical material systems that have limited ranges of magnetic equation and universal organic properties such as saline and water, which does not mean that all organisms came from the same sub-system, or even a directly related one, and it is more than vanity to divine-divide-or define the word of higher realization or learning so.

Such disputations are universally racism or its reactionary fatalisms when they evolve to emotional epitomes and particularly politically and socially politically.

Racism being the single most significant sociological issue of the industrial era, the Civil War, the Spanish American War, World War I, World War II, the Korean Conflict, Vietnam, Afganistan, Eastern Europe, Middle Eastern terrorism, the IRA war against Britain, etc. are all racially originated, moved, and ultimately intended. None are righteous disputes, if this means objectively, and conscientiously subjectively defined (divined) efforts and the cost to the world, human progress, and artificial wealth in its better and universally beneficial and meaningfull extremes. It is all instinctively driven, reactionary defined, and poorly cultivated cognitively definitively sociologically otherwise. In a real sense it is the demonic (manically defined), ‘babylon’ cliches of biblical legend in a real and vast and complicated context.

The Sramanas of ancient India cultivated a critical notion amongst religious cultural histories. They were too moderate, or physiologically constrained by their extreme environment, to resist the inevitable influx of other ‘major’ political interests and particularly the historic Aryan invasions. Brahmin ideology was a perfect contrast to the passivism prevalent in the lndus valley before major invasions (before 1500 B.C.). Sramanas were like tribesmen anywhere, where the humidity and temperature could bedazzle the senses and fatigue the system furthering natural hallucinogenic properties incidentally, to the ‘human’ evolution of the region. Like New Orleans is called the land of dreams in the West, or the

Sahara, the land of 1001 nights and the focal point of the nation of Islam, are naturally hallucinogenic places. Like southerners are slow of drawl and early to work and known for shade tree passtimes in the afternoons, they were adaptive to their surroundings and the accidental virtues they patterned were of the pantheon of classic ‘religious’ virtues anywhere the harsher extremes of the world forced their evolution, more or less. Particularly this is true of these where light, sunlight, played a crucial role in notions of clarity, sight, and illumination at exceptional levels. The Sramanas were so concerned for the difficulties of their environment and their inevitable socialization to cultivated family and class and regional units that they even developed a pragmatic mandate to detach themselves from their wives and children in order to maintain a greater peace from their frivolities and tedium, and avoid the cultivation of negative attitudes which might become political and institutional and digress their social progress, literally and insidiously unavoidably. Also, they knew their women were better suited to the emotional trials of teething and all of its psychological connotations to immediate family harmony. This was remarkably sophisticated in it’s way and in this unlikely era of the world. The region demanded such sublime practicalities, and they were evolved. Only Plato had suggested anything similar, at least on a family level, or regarding families, not just the separation of the pragmatic social archetypes professionally or the State as it would eventually be evolved to be.

The separation of priests and soldiers and politicians was becoming necessary throughout the socializing world by 1000 B.C. and with empirical exceptions as far back as possibly 5000 B.C. in the ‘utopian’ mediterranean coastal regions and particularly ancient Egypt to a contradictory but still ‘neurologically’ accidentally sophisticated extent.

The Kesins of ancient India developed the disciplines of Yoga which were critical recognitions of coordination, cardio-vascular emancipation and optimum circulation, and involuntary neurological-muscular integrations, strengths, and flexibility, and also for perceptual and cognitive emancipation. This had an elementary and fundamental effect on personality, intellect, and behavior (psychology and morality). To breathe ideally is to be able to think and act ideally. One must not artificially practise thinking and acting, one must practise breathing. One must practice thinking and action anyway and optimizing limited energies and limited emotional strengths in any ‘affordable’ way is only right.

To breathe better one must cleanse one’s neurology through the circulatory advantages of artificial or particularly prescriptive actions, as with all matters, ultimately, but to begin with fundamentally, to orchestrate and exercise the physiological system which distributes neurological enzymes conducive of the more focused stretching and shaping of the system and purging alcohol enzymes, cortisol, neuro-peptides, glucose and sodium enzymes, and alkalines and acids otherwise. The mind does not burn up the physiology with pointless or resolvable worries and phobias and the body breathes easier, naturally and yet conditionally and still self-determinedly. This three part equation of archetypical factors is the beginning of a key, a moral (clinical-medical, emotionally idiosyncratic) key. In fact, the ideas of liberation which had begun along with these religious (re-living through relative comprehensions and hindsight) disciplines are more directly related to emotional balance than is often stated, which is an other key, that visible complexity is only a percentage of Actual Complexity and things are far worse and things are far better depending on what is already accomplished comprehensively and physiologically and what is maintained and progressed ritualistically and religiously. Ritual and religion are most puritanically the practises of personal improvement and health maintenance and health progress for purposes of survival, at all, and within the loftier contexts of better ideals of what acceptable lives and deaths should be. That is also to say that achieving Nirvana or a void (of all mortal pain not a place necessarily) of some ethereal kind could have no definite ‘perfectly’ static meaning formally and only common-law priest descendants of common-law priests were to say what such things mean, and their religious policy has been consistently that it must be achieved in order to be understood and as in all fields of human endeavor this pragmatic holistic concept pervades rhetoric and history. That inklings of light are crucial in the darkness, but with light there must be a greatest possible proportion of sensation and participation to register meaning or associate or remember comparatively significantly meaningfully.

Ancient India and Hinduism generally believe that each act must be accounted for by the universe, and men of discerning natures, or what might be interpreted as, could see ‘absorbed’ as accounted for and ‘absorbed healthily’ as discerning natures depending on one’s class, karma, and narrow margins of personal integrity in the nature cycle otherwise to provide for opportunity and moral conceptual fertility of course though. Humanity must absorb it’s acts, how well is the undetermined question. The rest is decided by the static electrical coil which is the range of comparative electrical equilibriums where the human condition and the physical universe, as it can realize it, is. Some acts cannot be absorbed . . . or can they though? This is a semantic of microcosms and interwoven macrocosms that is impossible to master statically.

That depends on how one ‘splits hairs" definitively as to what is meant by the ethic and what is meant by the matter. To absorb like a wood surface absorbing a stain, then neurologies would be improved more effectively to think so. This would be potentially true even if neurologies did not reach this integral reality singularly and incidentally and were taught (told) so and as often as the conceptual might need to be highlighted or italicized or underlined in order to begin to be registered in stimuli contexts as they evolve. The quality of definitions saves the pain and anguish of misconceptions, emotional dissipation, and conscientious hardening and atrophy and stagnation. This is more important to life and learning than has been underscored effectively or at all. Processes which can be too terrifying literally in their immediate and short term extremes of consequence, eclipse long term extremes of consequence and blindly gambling perceptual natures with unarmed personal conditioning, that have no depth of experience or even ethereal cognition (rhetorical or book learning) to guide and moderate or suppress the sublimely reactionary Natural instincts. Nerves seem to burn themselves and each other to stimulate primal defenses and pattern strengths naturally according to frequency of practical, as it happened, needs. They both strengthen and weaken as they act. If this complexity is not moderated and guarded it is a physical complexity and incidentality that can be inperceptibly dangerous to life in any common perceptual sense. People can be taken from the world senselessly easily and the world, which has no rhetorical mediums directly, is often and easily the convenient object to blame, which then fuels the pleasure principles to disengage the center brain counsels from depth building the neurology of the system. Nerves do not care if one is thinking hypothetically entirely or if a situation is more graphic than not. Instincts are evolved for speed of response and little or nothing to regulate response is inevitable if that is the learning level of the particular system and when all extraneous moderations are taxed or missing, however so, there is nothing to govern many neuro-systems and yet others keep some or other directions or focus. This is elementary and should be treated so and still mortally seriously. This reality of cognitive arming, building, or orchestrated learning is a moral discipline medically and legally and definitively and must be recognized as such without fear or concern for political definitions corruptively and connotatively by any means otherwise possible and necessary. This has been understated by psychology and sociology and even significant portions of theology professionally. It is understated and over-glamorized amongst behavioral issues entirely in any other terms.

In many cases socially there is no mercy for crimes of morality (acts of recklessly illogical behaviors that result in harm to others or harm to wealth which results in harm to others). There is no mercy for society. Punitive assessments are often uninsightfull, misconstrued, and lacking in comprehensively substantial and complex matrices of effective contextual and historical moral-legal definition equations. Accountability religiously has been the practical and inevitable but still not widely used resolve, and it is considered an unfortunate, if that is ever a deterrent matter. It does not speak convincingly in current scientific and medical ‘dialects.’ It does not speak in current poetic ‘dialects’ commonly or exceptionally to any large extent. It is a dead psychological language to any common and pedestrian vantage. Those who still study it or were conditioned to practice it actively, rhetorically and behaviorally, know that it is not. They cannot give it a context though, and they cannot make others see what even the poorer uses of some of the metaphors has helped the rhetorical and conditional practisers see, even if poorly, even if uncommunicatively as Faulkner may have been trying to sympathize with in Benjy in his, The Sound and the Fury. Punishment can work, it just does not sometimes for these sorts of reasons, and victims remain victims and society increasingly is made up of them and victim psychologies evolve, Conditioning never ended in this scenario, it stopped being watched, it stopped being recognized, it stopped being respected, it stopped being moderated (except by increasingly extreme criminal default), and it stopped being used except for commercial marketing. The rigidity of class principles and ‘holding’ pain, as a composite medical concept, or conditioning physiologically and ultimately emotionally and cognitively, Functional Psychology, was rejected for the dangers of excess Conditioning, much