Electromass: The Same Principles at Every Scale

Copyright © 2010 by Justin Sandburg

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or by any information storage retrieval system without the written permission of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews.

iUniverse books may be ordered through booksellers or by contacting:

iUniverse

1663 Liberty Drive

Bloomington, IN 47403

www.iuniverse.com

1-800-Authors (1-800-288-4677)

Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any Web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.

ISBN: 978-1-4401-9379-8 (sc)

ISBN: 978-1-4401-9380-4 (ebook)

Printed in the United States of America

iUniverse rev. date: 9/2/2010

ELECTROMASS

The same principles at Every Scale

By Justin Sandburg

Cover photos taken from The Space Shuttle Endeavour, August 2007

Revised: 4 July 2010

Contents

A Curious Observer:

Principles:

The Basics:

Hand Rules:

A New look:

Beyond The Table:

Electromass:

Plasma:

Cosmology:

Lifecycle of a Star:

Emission:

Terms:

References:

Electromass and the Economy:

A Curious Observer:

Even the most distant pictures I see, it looks like electrical behavior repeating itself. What is the astronomy take on electricity?

The standard astronomical model follows the expanding universe decision paramount with Hubble (1929) and Tolman (1930). That same model follows the mathematics of Einstein (1905) and combines it with the required supermassiveness of black holes to date The Universe. The model also follows the mathematics of Shrodinger et al (Quantum Mechanics), and Feynman et al (Quantum Electrodynamics), which explains the atom’s behavior from an observational standpoint only. This becomes immediately cumbersome when complex protein chains start FOLDING several different ways, beginning your personalized archetype. Everyone is looking for a model that explains the why, because fundamentally these different sets of mathematics do not agree with each other; none are reasonably explained; and all require the introduction of new and unconfirmed fundamentals. Despite the general importance of plasma in astrophysics, the standard model continues to delineate that electromagnetic forces are not important at large cosmological distances. The reason for this is generally believed that unlike the other three forces which are attractive only, electromagnetism is both attractive and repulsive and over large cosmological distances, electromagnetic forces are believed to cancel each other. -Wikipedia

Most astronomers are interested in the majestic shapes and awesomeness of the array. They labor continually on the arduous task to make precise observations, which coincide with provided mathematics. However, math doesn’t prove concept. Math translates data. The scientific method demands that an order be placed so conclusions cannot be validated by hypotheses, and so mathematical tools cannot validate impossible ideas. First the concept; then the mathematics become evident; then and only once all attempts to disprove it are exhausted, does a concept become theory. It still requires years before a theory deserves a capital letter, and even longer before it becomes Law. Each field of science makes assumptions—putting limits of scope or validity. Such logic and limited data received demands the option for something new. Since we have certain data received, conclusions can now be drawn for the first time.

The scientific method is slightly different than what is observed in things like traffic law or the endless array of taxes, fees, rules and regulations. I’m more pro-government than most, but I tend to question the Laws of Physics (like a limit on the speed of light), alongside other laws like speed enforcement vs. lane enforcement. I don’t condone speeding in school zones but I also don’t condone slow driving in the left lanes because it’s as unnatural as a slower flow in the center of a river.

Although it’s heart demands answers to many philosophical implications, this book focuses on the strongpoints of Physics—attempting to refrain from expressing feelings one may have when hit with this concept—feelings, says my long favorite Pink Floyd’s The Trial, "of an almost