Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 93-1518
    Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 93-1518
    Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 93-1518
    Ebook53 pages43 minutes

    Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 93-1518

    By James Constant

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion – Patent Case 93-1518
    Affirmative Defenses Trump Patent Claims and raise questions of a court's jurisdiction to decide patent claims without violating jurisdictional statutes for the infringement of patents.In this case, petitioner's complaints were dismissed on issues of affirmative defenses. Petitioner filed for bankruptcy and brought the instant case in the bankruptcy court entitled Objections To Creditor's Claims Based On Void Judgments Obtained Through Fraud. The The lower courts rubber stamped the fraud and ordered their decisions not for publication. The Supreme Court denied the petitioner's petition without opinion.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherJames Constant
    Release dateAug 13, 2013
    ISBN9781301666515
    Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 93-1518
    Author

    James Constant

    writes on law, government, mathematics and science, as they are and as they should be

    Read more from James Constant

    Related to Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion

    Titles in the series (10)

    View More
    View More

    Related ebooks

    Law For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • UNLIMITED

      A Unique Military Program Helps Sexual Assault Survivors. But Not All of Them.

      Jul 30, 2019

      The military gives lawyers to victims. But civilians—who make up hundreds of cases a year—are left to fend for themselves.

      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Do Trustees Become The Legal Guardians Of Your Children?

      Jul 24, 2020

      The guardianship of children is governed in terms of section 18 of the Children’s Act, whereas the role of trustees is governed by the common law and the Trust Property Control Act, explains Elmarie Neilson of Neilsons Attorneys. The powers of truste

      1 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Attorneys Accused Of Acting Like ‘Loan Sharks’

      Nov 22, 2020

      TWO seasoned legal practitioners are required to show why they should not be struck off the roll of practising attorneys, considering the allegations of unprofessional and ethical conduct against them. Operating like “loan sharks”, charging exorbitan

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Innocent Until Proven Poor

      Aug 1, 2018

      THREE YEARS AFTER A TEXAS STATE TROOPER RIPPED her out of her car and slammed her to the ground over a traffic violation, Sandra Bland’s name still evokes images of police brutality. Her name also remains on the lips of bail reform activists; her dea

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      What To Consider When A Trust Is Involved In Legal Action

      Oct 17, 2020

      ANY LEGAL action by a trust must be properly brought in the names of the trustees. Since a trust is not a person and cannot act, when litigation is initiated the action must be brought (or defended) by its trustees. Although it is desirable to cite t

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      What’s a DST? The Lowdown for Real Estate Investors

      May 22, 2022

      DSTs are unique real estate investment vehicles that allow a group of individual investors to purchase fractional interests in large commercial real estate assets that typically would be well beyond their financial reach as solo investors. DST invest

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Trustees Are Accountable To The Master Of The High Court

      Jan 16, 2021

      A TRUSTEE of a trust is accountable at all times to the Master of the High Court and to beneficiaries. If trustees’ actions (a single or multiple trustees) contravene either the provisions of the Trust Property Control Act or the trust instrument, th

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Abortion Ruling And The Supreme Court’s Shadow Docket

      Sep 2, 2021

      An abortion decision with no oral arguments or lower court rulings? The Supreme Court is using its shadow docket for cases with potentially far-reaching implications.

      5 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Do Over Trust: Protecting Your Adult Children from Themselves

      Mar 4, 2019

      Wealthy parents and grandparents who have dutifully planned ahead for their children's futures should consider this cautionary tale. It's 1998: You accumulated sizable estate assets and you and your lawyer created an irrevocable dynasty trust for y

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Killer Bride

      May 14, 2020

      Killer Bride
      5 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Beneficiary Designations: 5 Critical Mistakes to Avoid

      Apr 5, 2019

      Many people might not realize that their will does not control who inherits all of their assets when they die. Many assets pass by beneficiary designation — which is the ability to fill out a form with the financial company holding the asset and name

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Mobile-home Residents Unite To Take On Landlords

      Dec 17, 2018

      MARIBETH SHEEDY GOT A LETTER FROM her new landlord the day after Christmas last year. So did many of her neighbors in the Akron Manufactured Home Community in Akron, N.Y. The park’s new owner, Florida-based Sunrise Capital Investors, was proposing a

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      How Do You Prove You’re Innocent If You’re On Death Row?

      Nov 13, 2019

      Rodney Reed faces execution in Texas despite mounting evidence of innocence and bipartisan support.

      5 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      When Kamala Was a Top Cop

      Aug 25, 2019

      When Kamala Was a Top Cop
      9 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      What To Consider When A Trust Is Involved In Legal Action

      Oct 17, 2020

      ANY LEGAL action by a trust must be properly brought in the names of the trustees. Since a trust is not a person and cannot act, when litigation is initiated the action must be brought (or defended) by its trustees. Although it is desirable to cite t

      3 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion - James Constant

      Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion – Patent Case 93-1518

      Affirmative Defenses Trump Patent Claims

      By James Constant

      Smashwords Edition

      Copyright © 2001 by James Constant

      Smashwords Edition, License Notes

      This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

      No. 93-1518

      In The SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

      October Term, 1993

      In Re: JAMES CONSTANT, Debtor, Appeal Court Nos 92-55465,92-56220, 92-56475

      JAMES CONSTANT, Petitioner,

      v.

      ADVANCED MICRO-DEVICES, INC.; KRISTIN M. CANO; KANE, DALSLMER, SULLIVAN, KURUCZ, LEVY, EISELE & RICHARD; AT&T PARADYNE; JONATHAN R. ELLOWITZ; ANTHONY DE ALCUAZ; SKJERVEN, MORRILL, MACPHERSON, FRANKLIN & FRIEL; MORRISON & FOERSTER; LIMBACH & SUTTON; FUJITSU, LTD; FUJITSU MICROELECTRONICS; PAUL MALINGAGIO; SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON; BAKER MILLS & GLAST; ACKER, UNDERWOOD & SMITH; FPS, INC; FULLBRIGHT & JAWORSKI; AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH; SPENSLEY, HORN, JUBAS & LUBITZ; HITACHI AMERICA, INC.; PRETTY SCHROE- DER, BRUEGGEMAN & CLARK; HOPGOODE, CALIMAFDE, KALIL, BLAUSTEIN & JUDLOWE; ANALOG DEVICES, INC.;NEC ELECTRONICS, INC.; BLAKELY, SOKO- LOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN; BROWN & BAIN; MARCEL HOFF; INTEL CORP.; ROMNEY, GOLANT, MARTEN & ASHEN; AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.; GOULD, INC.; TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC.; GROSSMAN, GRAVEN, PERRY & BLOCK; DIGITAL SWITCH, INC.; GRANGERASSOCIATES, INC.; MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON; ARNOLD; ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.; TRW, INC.; WHITE & DURKEE; DAVID L. RAY, Trustee; SALTZBURG, RAY & BERGMAN, Respondents

      PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI.TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

      James Constant, Pro-per Petitioner

      i

      QUESTIONS PRESENTED

      Should this Court resolve direct conflicts between the court of appeal's decisions and decisions of this Court and other Circuit Courts on the following matters:

      1. Whether affirmative defenses of patent invalidity and of res judicata are claims for purposes of final Judgments under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).

      2. Whether affirmative defenses of patent invalidity and of res judicata are claims for purposes of jurisdiction under 28 USC 1338,1331,1343,1334 and 28 USC 157(b)(2) (B) and (C).

      3. Whether affirmative defenses of patent invalidity and res judicata offend due process when they deprive petitioner's right to be heard on claims of his complaints.

      4. Whether the appeal court can make its decision without an inquiry into the question of subject matter jurisdiction raised by petitioner in the action.

      5. Whether Judgments in earlier cases may be subsequently attacked for lack of subject matter jurisdiction when it appears that the earlier judgments were manifest abuses of authority or have seriously impaired the public interest by deciding complaints on the basis of affirmative defenses of patent invalidity and res judicata or have infringed due process of a party's right to be heard on claims of a complaint.

      ii

      6. Whether sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure can be considered on issues of defense in papers not signed by petitioner.

      7. Whether a creditor's judgment is a lien against United States Patents under 28 USC 1962.

      8. Whether courts have jurisdiction of subject matter to order the assignment of United States Patents by operation of California State laws.

      iii

      TABLE OF CONTENTS

      OPINIONS BELOW

      JURISDICTION

      CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED

      STATEMENT OF THE CASE

      REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT

      A. Judgments In Earlier Cases And In Instant Case Are Not Final

      B. Judgments In Earlier Cases And

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1