Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
    Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
    Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
    Ebook33 pages30 minutes

    Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963

    By James Constant

    5/5

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Does Civil Rule 12(h)(3) require that a court must decide a question of jurisdiction before it?
    Does patent statute 35 USC 261 bar a court's jurisdiction to void the assignment of United States Patents by operation of California State laws? Does judgement lien statute 28 USC 1962 bar a court's jurisdiction to hear a suit to void the assignment of United States patents by operation of California State laws?

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherJames Constant
    Release dateJul 5, 2013
    ISBN9781301253265
    Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
    Author

    James Constant

    writes on law, government, mathematics and science, as they are and as they should be

    Read more from James Constant

    Related to Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963

    Titles in the series (10)

    View More
    View More

    Related ebooks

    Constitutional Law For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related categories

    Reviews for Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963

    5/5

    2 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963 - James Constant

      Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782

      - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3)

      Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963

      By James Constant

      Smashwords Edition

      Copyright © 1994 by James Constant

      Smashwords Edition, License Notes

      This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

      No. 94-782

      IN THE

      SUPREME COURT OF THE

      UNITED STATES

      October Term, 1994

      ________________________________________________________

      In Re: JAMES CONSTANT,

      Debtor.

      ________________________________________________________

      ARGEREY CONSTANT, JAMES CONSTANT

      Petitioners,

      V.

      DAVID L. RAY, SALTZBURG, RAY & BERGMAN,

      Respondents.

      ________________________________________

      PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

      TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

      FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

      Argerey Constant

      James Constant

      Pro-per Petitioners

      i

      QUESTIONS PRESENTED

      Should this Court resolve direct conflicts between the court of appeal's decision on jurisdiction and decisions on jurisdiction of this Court and other Circuit Courts on the following matters:

      Does Civil Rule 12(h)(3) require that a court must decide a question of jurisdiction before it?

      Does patent statute 35 USC 261 bar a court's jurisdiction to void the assignment of United States Patents by operation of California State laws?

      Does judgement lien statute 28 USC 1962 bar a court's jurisdiction to hear a suit to void the assignment of United States patents by operation of California State laws?

      ii

      TABLE OF CONTENTS

      Page

      OPINIONS BELOW

      JURISDICTION

      STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED

      STATEMENT OF THE CASE

      REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT

      A. Civil Rule 12(h)(3) Requires That A Court Must Decide A Question of Jurisdiction

      Before It

      B. Patent Statute 35

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1